What does the party platform say on the topic?Newsflash,.. There are Republicans who support the right to abortion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does the party platform say on the topic?Newsflash,.. There are Republicans who support the right to abortion.
Don't see too many voting that off the "platform" these days...What does the party platform say on the topic?
Just as presidential/congressional elections have nothing to do w/ this vote. Glad to see you're catching on.Those have nothing to do with a "landslide" vote.
Just as presidential/congressional elections have nothing to do w/ this vote.
A very small minority is in favor of "no restrictions" abortions up to 35 weeks gestation.Put no restrictions abortion on a ballot and it too will fail.
You seem incapable of differentiating b/w a vote on an amendment and a vote on a candidate.You don't seem to want to recognize what a "landslide" vote is.
No, I made no claim as such.You seem incapable of differentiating b/w a vote on an amendment and a vote on a candidate.
Yet you keep comparing the results to presidential and congressional elections.... just acknowledge you understand they are not comparable.No, I made no claim as such.
Simply that a 58+% victory is not "a close call"
They ARE comparable.Yet you keep comparing the results to presidential and congressional elections.... just acknowledge you understand they are not comparable.
Why don't the R's representatives represent them, then?
What does the party platform say on the topic?
Ugh. No, they're not. Voting on a single issue is NOT comparable to voting for any sort of representative person.They ARE comparable.
ANY election or vote being won by >58% is a "landslide". Why you cannot acknowledge this is utterly baffling.
More often than notDo your supposed political representatives always correctly represent you?
Not my point.Voting on a single issue is NOT comparable to voting for any sort of representative person.
The result was incredibly predictable and very much in line with all polling data. Comparing it to congressional and presidential elections, as you have done, is irrelevant and pointless.Not my point.
the RESULT is my point.
No, it was not.The result was incredibly predictable
Lol…a woman’s right to bodily autonomy is extreme. That’s the problem. That kind of thinking.Put no restrictions abortion on a ballot and it too will fail. People don't want the extreme ends on this issue. The voting will follow the belief of moderation on when one can be performed regardless of what the crazy people on each end of the spectrum try and push.
This underlines more than anything so far that the supreme court was right to turn the issue back to the states where it belongs. There will be federal legislation at some point but it isn't here yet
Remember the political parties raise too much money off this issue to want it resolved in a reasonable manner that most Americans can agree is the best option
Trump won KS by 15 points.44% of registered voters in KS are republican...so, no, not really overwhelming.
Yes, it was. I dont care what silver said. The results were EXACTLY in line w/ polling data.No, it was not.
Nate Silver's site had indicated it was a "tossup" before the primary.
No, the polling data of registered voters was "too close to call"Yes, it was. I dont care what silver said.
I read it. What does the percentage of registered Republicans have to do with the political leanings of the state? The registered voters of that state overwhelmingly backed Trump regardless of their registration. Thanks to their overreach they got LOTS of new women voters who rejected them. That's significant.🤦♂️
Read the thread...
What does the political affiliations of residents of the state have to do w/ political leanings of the state? Everything.I read it. What does the percentage of registered Republicans have to do with the political leanings of the state? The registered voters of that state overwhelmingly backed Trump regardless of their registration. Thanks to their overreach they got LOTS of new women voters who rejected them. That's significant.
Polling data on abortion...please try to keep up or stop posting.No, the polling data of registered voters was "too close to call"
Problem is, LOTS more people registered to vote and came out to vote than usual.
Not the same as a primary election ballot.Polling data on abortion
lol...everything? You have to be kidding? Did Trump only get 44% of the vote in Kansas?What does the political affiliations of residents of the state have to do w/ political leanings of the state? Everything.
What does the political affiliations of residents of the state have to do w/ political leanings of the state? Everything.
Id agree if we were talking about a binary choice, but in this instance we have 4 different groups, of which, one is fairly nebulous.Disagree,.. Neither party is as homogeneous as we pretend them to be.
Are you still thinking this was a presidential or congressional vote? Because it wasnt - it was a single issue vote that is absolutely in line with polling data. (apparently you did not read the thread because this thought process has already been walked through. Its a false equivalency)lol...everything? You have to be kidding? Did Trump only get 44% of the vote in Kansas?
I guess this discussion is going over your head. I was hopeful but not surprised discussing this with someone who tries to rationalize texting and driving.Not the same as a primary election ballot.
Remember: pollsters take into account "public opinion" vs "likely voters".
I fully understand it.I guess this discussion is going over your head.
Good come back. Full of data and logic. Gunna break out "I'm rubber and you're glue" next?I fully understand it.
You, apparently, cannot.
You can visit Nate Silver's site for the info, if you like.Good come back. Full of data and logic
Where are the "facts and raw data"? You're a fraud. Always have been.Still prioritizing disagreement over facts and raw data I see. Not surprised.
(Cue laughing emoji and juvenile insults)
Holy shit you actually did the laughing emoji and the juvenile insult. Out of pride alone I would've thought you would've refrained on this one at least. Again, i give you too much credit.Where are the "facts and raw data"? You're a fraud. Always have been.
Why would I care what someone, who was evidently wrong, have to say on the subject?You can visit Nate Silver's site for the info, if you like.
Nope. You gave partial information and tried to pass it off as complete. You're a fraud, as everyone knows. You've been savaged in this thread and others for your foolishness. It would be wise for you to stop, but you can't because you are weak. You continue to demonstrate ignorance but carry on with your tirades - it's comical.Holy shit you actually did the laughing emoji and the juvenile insult. Out of pride alone I would've thought you would've refrained on this one at least. Again, i give you too much credit.
You've already been given the facts and raw data (voter registration breakdown) - you're just too hellbent on disagreeing at all costs and reading what isn't written, you can't comprehend what is written.
What is 851,882 divided by 1,929,972?Nope. You gave partial information and tried to pass it off as complete. You're a fraud, as everyone knows. You've been savaged in this thread and others for your foolishness. It would be wise for you to stop, but you can't because you are weak. You continue to demonstrate ignorance but carry on with your tirades - it's comical.
BWAAAAHAHAHAHA - you think this is relevant at this point in the thread. BWAAAAAHAHAHAHA.What is 851,882 divided by 1,929,972?