Overturned Pass
- Thread starter IowaHawkeyeFBnBB4Life
- Start date
You have to go with the call on the field. There was not near enough evidence to overturn it
Bullshit. He juggled the ball and didn't control it until he was OOB. Another atrocious pass from Stanley.
The ball moved between his hands when it hit the ground. It was easier to overturn than the TJ Moe catch in the 2010 Insight Bowl.
Ok, I did not see that.
I have no other conclusion to draw but YOU ARENT A HAWKEYE FAN.
I wanted the play to stand, but this is correct.
Let’s say the call stood. I would still have 0% confidence Stanley could get it in the end zone.
A
anon_i8nzeu2gbf0ba
Guest
Bullshit. He caught the ball, and there was NO "indisputable video evidence" that shows otherwise. The call of a catch should have stood. But that Iowa can continually lose games the way they do IS indisputable. There goes the season . . . again . . .
They're going with the home team in that situation. But the game was not lost on that play. We needed 6 points and that wasnt going to make it happen
This. Even if it touched the ground while he controlled it, there wasn’t a camera angle that should have overruled the call on the field.
It is an official pick, which is exactly why the ruling on the field should stand, always. With that said, no chance Stanley wins this game. He was completely inept today. Just awful.
It has nothing to do with the ground. He didn’t have any feet in bounds after he let lose and collected it again. Had he not bobbled it it would have been a catch.
Bad throw, fine call.
Bad throw, fine call.
Raise your hand if you knew they were going to overturn it the minute a review was coming.
Love the hawks, but the video official got that one right. There was definitely indisputable video evidence. Also, Brian Greise sucks - we can all agree on that at least, right? 
You probably won't appreciate my perspective, but you asked for it.
I didn't think it was a catch. But I also didn't think there was sufficient evidence to warrant overturning the call, once it had been called a catch.
Unfortunately, the review process was quickly transformed into something it was not supposed to be: Second guessing. The idea wasn't to look at a call from several angles in slow motion and decide what happened. The idea was to avoid egregious, correctable errors.
Wasn't pissed about being ruled no catch. Iowa gave me alot more things to be pissed about that game.
Great perspective LC. Once I saw the close up I could see how it was overturned. We can talk about all things about these games, but the fact is they made fewer mistakes and more big plays. Yesterday PSU was better than us. A good team will learn and rebound . We’ll see.
Iowa still got close enough to chuck it into the endzone twice with 15 seconds left. That gives you like a 3% chance to win. What does Stanley do? 10 yrd pass incomplete, and then laterals to a lineman. And then the lineman tries to run instead of chuck it himself. Those decisions give you almost 0% chance to win.
These players don't seem well coached in some regards.
These players don't seem well coached in some regards.
As a PSU fan, I thought he dragged that right toe in-bounds just after he got control, and thought that the refs would rule it a catch. One of the toughest calls to make, and I may have missed the timing of his right foot and complete control of the ball.
The ball moved against the ground, showing not quite control, as he hit ground. Specifically, it moved differentially from his hands. If hands move with ball that shows control. That’s not what happened. It was actually fairly obvious
Last edited:
He tapped his foot with control, then lost control of the ball without another body part ever touching inbounds again. No catch.
You think? Then it should have stood. The play cannot be reversed unless you know.
This. He gained control as his thigh had already hit the out of bounds boundary. Incomplete pass.
