What would you say is ISU's biggest signature bowl win?
Its gotta be the 2009 Insight bowl, a 14-13 pillow fight against Minnesota.
That game moved ISU into a tie with Rick Stanzi for number of bowl victories.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What would you say is ISU's biggest signature bowl win?
And that is relevant How? Nobody cares because we are still talking about small market. There was talk on Sirius about Netflix, Hulu, etc. Making a play for a conference of 30 blue bloods for content, and it was bad news for both Iowa and ISU. The state of Iowa and alums in other states are not enough for to help either program. There just isn't enough interest in either regardless of the standard denials from the fake i.d. fan base.
And that is relevant How? Nobody cares because we are still talking about small market. There was talk on Sirius about Netflix, Hulu, etc. Making a play for a conference of 30 blue bloods for content, and it was bad news for both Iowa and ISU. The state of Iowa and alums in other states are not enough for to help either program. There just isn't enough interest in either regardless of the standard denials from the fake i.d. fan base.
Not relevant because not enough of the public cares. The market is just too small.We turn in a top-10 finish about every five years on average since 2000. That's relevant. Not to mention ours is the #22 richest program in the country which you seem to be casually ignoring. Money and success. That's what we bring. Foreign concepts to you, I get it.
And that is relevant How? Nobody cares because we are still talking about small market. There was talk on Sirius about Netflix, Hulu, etc. Making a play for a conference of 30 blue bloods for content, and it was bad news for both Iowa and ISU. The state of Iowa and alums in other states are not enough for to help either program. There just isn't enough interest in either regardless of the standard denials from the fake i.d. fan base.
Not relevant because not enough of the public cares. The market is just too small.
Well you got the BLAH, BLAH, BLAH part right anyway....
Not relevant because not enough of the public cares. The market is just too small.
Now you just seem bitter. Is it because Lazard has turned out to be such a bust? He has a year to turn it around, you never know.
When did Lazard become a bust? He will hold most of the receiving records at ISU before he is done.Now you just seem bitter. Is it because Lazard has turned out to be such a bust? He has a year to turn it around, you never know.
True enough, but that didn't stop Delaney from welcoming Nebraska....
Good. Talking about the matchup instead of doom and gloom that is facing both Iowa and ISUStep one is having the ability to out run Iowa linebackers. He couldn't do it in last years game. I am sure that the NFL is way impressed.
LOL!!Nebraska was closer to B1G rankings in research and academics. They also were geographically contiguous, and, being the 12th school, allowed the addition of a conference title game.
OU is remote, with worse academics. If the scenario is to add OU/OkSU, I don't really think that happens. If the scenario is to add OU/UT, B1G will swallow the poison pill and take them both.
When did Lazard become a bust? He will hold most of the receiving records at ISU before he is done.
Texas hasn't been good ever since Greg Davis left there.
Good. Talking about the matchup instead of doom and gloom that is facing both Iowa and ISU
Iowa will not win in Ames this year, btw. You don't have a competent QB yet.
Good. Talking about the matchup instead of doom and gloom that is facing both Iowa and ISU
Iowa will not win in Ames this year, btw. You don't have a competent QB yet.
You won't be running it down anyone's throat if you can't throw at all. ISU is better at every single skill position.Probably won't need one. We'll just run it down your throat. lol, Iowa is not facing doom and gloom. You're trying way too hard. You've lost this argument. It was based on facts given to you, your arguments are all emotional and not base in reality.
Iowa is top 25 in revenue, no problem there. You are worried about a 30 team super conference, as an ISU fan, you should be. As and Iowa fan, I'm not. I'd be willing to bet Iowa is in that group of thirty for a number of reasons, a lot of those reason have already been used to dismiss your arguments.
You won't be running it down anyone's throat if you can't throw at all. ISU is better at every single skill position.
He's 100% correct. Your persistence in portraying Iowa and ISU in the same light is stupid at best and disingenuous at worst. Give it up. You are wrong here.Blah...Blah...Blah....the world is flat and Iowa is a large market team
You won't be running it down anyone's throat if you can't throw at all. ISU is better at every single skill position.
Qb-Iowa state because he has starts doesn't mean he is better..You won't be running it down anyone's throat if you can't throw at all. ISU is better at every single skill position.
Not relevant because not enough of the public cares. The market is just too small.
What difference does the size of Iowa's market make? Absolutely NONE! Why? Because it's only important if you A) don't have a conference and are in need of one or B) The conference you are currently in is collapsing.And that is relevant How? Nobody cares because we are still talking about small market. There was talk on Sirius about Netflix, Hulu, etc. Making a play for a conference of 30 blue bloods for content, and it was bad news for both Iowa and ISU. The state of Iowa and alums in other states are not enough for to help either program. There just isn't enough interest in either regardless of the standard denials from the fake i.d. fan base.
Good. Talking about the matchup instead of doom and gloom that is facing both Iowa and ISU
Iowa will not win in Ames this year, btw. You don't have a competent QB yet.
I'm still waiting for his rationale on how any of ISU's RBs are better than Wadley. That's sure to be gold.
Didn't your QB just throw an interception to the QB he backed up last year who's now playing MLB? Yikes.
Better question is outside of isu, will Lanning be able to know the plays before the snap of the ball in order to always be in the right spot?Not only that, I think he is the starting MLB. How freaking scary is that? A QB in January now starting MLB in April. How freaking horrible must ISU LB'ers be?
Better question is outside of isu, will Lanning be able to know the plays before the snap of the ball in order to always be in the right spot?
The B1G doesn't need to worry. The B12 might.
Mike Warren was a freshman All American 2 years ago and he lost his starting job to David Montgomery last year. Together, they will have a better running game than Iowa's backs. ISU will be serviceable in the trenches and much better than Iowa on the back end of the defense. There will be no learning curve this year when the teams play.I'm still waiting for his rationale on how any of ISU's RBs are better than Wadley. That's sure to be gold.
And Iowa has had really good receivers when? Are you going back to Tim Dwight?Yeah but that's like bragging about winning the 50-yard dash in a race full of fat kids.
It's like talking to a wall Scout. It's should be painfully obvious to him by now, but he can't back away from 5 pages of lunacy.What difference does the size of Iowa's market make? Absolutely NONE! Why? Because it's only important if you A) don't have a conference and are in need of one or B) The conference you are currently in is collapsing.
Iowa has neither of those issues and they never will. The BIG is a conference founded on R E S E A R C H first and sports affiliation second. Iowa is one of the earliest members. They aren't being kicked out and the BIG conference isn't going anywhere! They aren't disbanding because they want some blue blood super conference because the CIC controls the purse strings. Not the sports programs.
Mike Warren was a freshman All American 2 years ago and he lost his starting job to David Montgomery last year. Together, they will have a better running game than Iowa's backs. ISU will be serviceable in the trenches and much better than Iowa on the back end of the defense. There will be no learning curve this year when the teams play.
And Iowa has had really good receivers when? Are you going back to Tim Dwight?
And Iowa has had really good receivers when? Are you going back to Tim Dwight?
Brand new staff with new scheme has a learning curve. We will be much better this time around. Iowa has.a new QB & Offensive coordinator. I like our chances in Ames.Your freshman all american gained 9 yards on 3 rushes against us that year, and 28 yards on 7 rushes last year. Montgomery rushed 3 times for 7 yards against us last year. Our third string guy coming into this year averaged more yards per carry last year against ISU than Montgomery did. Seriously. I know you pop a half chub because when Warren isn't fumbling games away against KSU he's racking up nice numbers against pathetic Big 12 rush defenses, but it's pretty funny. Wadley gained more yards on 9 carries against ISU last year than Warren/Montgomery have gained against Iowa the past two years.