Y
Do you seriously need to even ask that?
Who am I kidding. You simply like to start shit and argue. Pathetic.
Iowa is a football school and the Hawkeyes have been "the shit" in Iowa for decades. Support, both financial and fan base. NFL resume. Facilities.
Those other 2 have had very little success and have a pitance of support.
But tell us your opinion
Yes, seriously, what sets up Iowa better?
My guess is that you thought Iowa was set up better than Minnesota 5 years ago too, right?
Illinois alumni base is, what, double, Iowa's? You say their support it "pitance" compared to Iowas, based on what? Them playing poorly the last however many years? When Illinois has won, their fans have traveled, they just don't do much winning. Illinois has more than enough money to throw around. Beckman was paid $2M, Groce gets paid $1.7M. They are in a state with 4x as many residents.
To simply write them, or Indiana, off because Iowa has better support is ignorant and short-sighted. Its comments like this that show the cluelessness of fan-bases. There is very little that makes Iowa intrinsically better than any other school in the Big Ten, to pretend that Iowa has some predilection towards success compared to them is f****** stupid.
Iowa is not a "football" school more than it ever was a basketball school, if anything it is a wrestling school. Sure, football exceeded basketball in basketball's absolute darkest days, but one can't simply ignore the support it received in the 70s-2000s compared to football.