ADVERTISEMENT

Platte River and the backups

Vroom_C14

HB Heisman
Mar 3, 2014
6,959
2,076
113
Seems that the employees were even concerned...

In the letter, Johnson quotes from emails sent by and to employees at Platte River Networks, which indicate there was discussion about how the duration of data backups could be reduced, apparently at the direction of the Clinton Executive Service Corp.

Then this past August, a Platte River Networks employee wrote to a coworker that he was, "Starting to think this whole thing really is covering up some shaddy (sic) s**t."

"I just think if we have it in writing that they told us to cut the backups, and that we can go public with our statement saying we have backups since day one, then we were told to trim to 30days (sic), it would make us look a WHOLE LOT better," the unnamed employee continued.

The email was sent shortly after news emerged that the FBI was looking into the security of the server, and several months after it was revealed that Clinton exclusively used the private account to conduct State Department business.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/07/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-platte-river-networks/index.html
 
Seems that the employees were even concerned...

In the letter, Johnson quotes from emails sent by and to employees at Platte River Networks, which indicate there was discussion about how the duration of data backups could be reduced, apparently at the direction of the Clinton Executive Service Corp.

Then this past August, a Platte River Networks employee wrote to a coworker that he was, "Starting to think this whole thing really is covering up some shaddy (sic) s**t."

"I just think if we have it in writing that they told us to cut the backups, and that we can go public with our statement saying we have backups since day one, then we were told to trim to 30days (sic), it would make us look a WHOLE LOT better," the unnamed employee continued.

The email was sent shortly after news emerged that the FBI was looking into the security of the server, and several months after it was revealed that Clinton exclusively used the private account to conduct State Department business.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/07/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-platte-river-networks/index.html
Try doing what Hillary did at a major finance company, and you will easily go to Jail.
 
Only in your fevered wingnut delusional dreams.

Your right, there's nothing to see here, except some independent employees contracted by Hillary to maintain her server concerned about Hillary covering up some "shaddy shit." Oh wait...... These guys will probably catch the dead soon and then you can continue with your blissful ignorance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vroom_C14
If ever
Your right, there's nothing to see here, except some independent employees contracted by Hillary to maintain her server concerned about Hillary covering up some "shaddy shit." Oh wait...... These guys will probably catch the dead soon and then you can continue with your blissful ignorance.

First and foremost. It's you're not your and it's shady not shaddy.

That said, if I thought something/someone was up to some "shady s***" every time someone changed a retention level on a backup image I'd get nothing done. This is just another dead end and Republicans will come out once again with egg on their face. Hillary may be slimy but she's like OiT. You're never going to paint her into a corner. She's far to political savvy for something like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
So my 4 years as Aegon was all a dream. You have no freaking clue as to what you're talking about.

aegon_the_conqueror_wofiaf_4585.jpg
 
She's far to political savvy for something like that.

You're confusing political savvy for woeful ignorance by her followers. I'll give you a pass on not knowing the difference since you're part of the woefully ignorant posse.
 
Hillary's emails are in the 'cloud'. And she didn't even know about it. Savvy indeed.


WASHINGTON


A Connecticut company, which backed up Hillary Clinton‘s emails at the request of a Colorado firm, apparently surprised her aides by storing the emails on a “cloud” storage system designed to optimize data recovery.

The firm, Datto Inc., said Wednesday that it turned over the contents of its storage to the FBI on Tuesday.

A Republican Senate committee chairman, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, also has asked the firm to provide the committee copies of any data from Clinton’s account still in its possession.

There were conflicting accounts as to whether the developments could lead to retrieval of any of Clinton’s more than 31,000 personal emails, which she said she deleted from her private server upon turning over her work-related emails to the State Department, at its request, in December 2014.


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article37968711.html#storylink=cpy
 
The FBI took 4 DEPT of State Servers Today!

LOL Hillary is dead in the Water only Cig would say Nothing to See Here Move on lol!!!

Cig = Kevin Bacon in Animals House lol!!!!!!!!!!
 
So my 4 years at Aegon was all a dream. You have no freaking clue as to what you're talking about.


So, in your four years at Aegon did you have access to data controlled by Sarbanes Oxley laws? Did you have access to data controlled by HIPAA? Did you have access to data controlled by NPI laws?

If you did to some or all, you absolutely were trained on the proper handling and control of that data. If you had access to any of that data and took personal possession of that data, in an manner that was not consistent with your company com-pliancy controls, you would be in violation of your company policy and the law that they wrote the policy to comply with.

Clone, please help, these laws have been in place for a while and should be easy to understand.
 
So, in your four years at Aegon did you have access to data controlled by Sarbanes Oxley laws? Did you have access to data controlled by HIPAA? Did you have access to data controlled by NPI laws?

If you did to some or all, you absolutely were trained on the proper handling and control of that data. If you had access to any of that data and took personal possession of that data, in an manner that was not consistent with your company com-pliancy controls, you would be in violation of your company policy and the law that they wrote the policy to comply with.

Clone, please help, these laws have been in place for a while and should be easy to understand.

Sounds like obstruction of justice.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT