ADVERTISEMENT

POLL: How Many Green Party Positions Do You Share?

Nov 28, 2010
84,128
37,945
113
Maryland
The Ten Key Values of the Green Party
Originally ratified at the Green Party Convention in Denver, Colorado, June 2000

1. GRASSROOTS DEMOCRACY
Every human being deserves a say in the decisions that affect their lives and not be subject to the will of another. Therefore, we will work to increase public participation at every level of government and to ensure that our public representatives are fully accountable to the people who elect them. We will also work to create new types of political organizations which expand the process of participatory democracy by directly including citizens in the decision-making process.

2. SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
All persons should have the rights and opportunity to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment. We must consciously confront in ourselves, our organizations, and society at large, barriers such as racism and class oppression, sexism and homophobia, ageism and disability, which act to deny fair treatment and equal justice under the law.

3. ECOLOGICAL WISDOM
Human societies must operate with the understanding that we are part of nature, not separate from nature. We must maintain an ecological balance and live within the ecological and resource limits of our communities and our planet. We support a sustainable society which utilizes resources in such a way that future generations will benefit and not suffer from the practices of our generation. To this end we must practice agriculture which replenishes the soil; move to an energy efficient economy; and live in ways that respect the integrity of natural systems.

4. NON-VIOLENCE
It is essential that we develop effective alternatives to society's current patterns of violence. We will work to demilitarize, and eliminate weapons of mass destruction, without being naive about the intentions of other governments. We recognize the need for self-defense and the defense of others who are in helpless situations. We promote non-violent methods to oppose practices and policies with which we disagree, and will guide our actions toward lasting personal, community and global peace.

5. DECENTRALIZATION
Centralization of wealth and power contributes to social and economic injustice, environmental destruction, and militarization. Therefore, we support a restructuring of social, political and economic institutions away from a system which is controlled by and mostly benefits the powerful few, to a democratic, less bureaucratic system. Decision-making should, as much as possible, remain at the individual and local level, while assuring that civil rights are protected for all citizens.

6. COMMUNITY-BASED ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE
We recognize it is essential to create a vibrant and sustainable economic system, one that can create jobs and provide a decent standard of living for all people while maintaining a healthy ecological balance. A successful economic system will offer meaningful work with dignity, while paying a "living wage" which reflects the real value of a person's work.

Local communities must look to economic development that assures protection of the environment and workers' rights; broad citizen participation in planning; and enhancement of our "quality of life." We support independently owned and operated companies which are socially responsible, as well as co-operatives and public enterprises that distribute resources and control to more people through democratic participation.

7. FEMINISM AND GENDER EQUITY
We have inherited a social system based on male domination of politics and economics. We call for the replacement of the cultural ethics of domination and control with more cooperative ways of interacting that respect differences of opinion and gender. Human values such as equity between the sexes, interpersonal responsibility, and honesty must be developed with moral conscience. We should remember that the process that determines our decisions and actions is just as important as achieving the outcome we want.

8. RESPECT FOR DIVERSITY
We believe it is important to value cultural, ethnic, racial, sexual, religious and spiritual diversity, and to promote the development of respectful relationships across these lines.

We believe that the many diverse elements of society should be reflected in our organizations and decision-making bodies, and we support the leadership of people who have been traditionally closed out of leadership roles. We acknowledge and encourage respect for other life forms than our own and the preservation of biodiversity.

9. PERSONAL AND GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY
We encourage individuals to act to improve their personal well-being and, at the same time, to enhance ecological balance and social harmony. We seek to join with people and organizations around the world to foster peace, economic justice, and the health of the planet.

10. FUTURE FOCUS AND SUSTAINABILITY
Our actions and policies should be motivated by long-term goals. We seek to protect valuable natural resources, safely disposing of or "unmaking" all waste we create, while developing a sustainable economics that does not depend on continual expansion for survival. We must counterbalance the drive for short-term profits by assuring that economic development, new technologies, and fiscal policies are responsible to future generations who will inherit the results of our actions.
 
Most of these are so vaguely written that I have no idea if I agree or not.

1) This sounds fine on its face, but it seems purposely worded to avoid supporting the idea of constitutionally protected minority rights. There are times we all want people to be subject to the will of another.

2) What is that first sentence trying to say? It reads to me like its calling for some sort of georgian or socialist economic system. But contextually that seems out of place with the 2nd part calling for non-discrimination.

3) Sounds fine until you figure food production would plummet. What is the solution for the problems this platform causes?

4) I agree.

5) There are a few things to quibble with here. I agree that centralization of wealth leads to economic injustice. I'm not sure the link to environmental or military injustice is intrinsic however and thus decentralizing may not address either. They then go on to say that what ever they want to do about the issue should be done by the individual. To me that reads like they don't want to actually do anything about decentralization other then encourage people to voluntarily give their money and power away.

6) This is another one that generally sounds nice, but what changes are they going to make to allow all this economic growth and prosperity? To achieve the conditions they want, their system must make more than our current one, right? So how are they planning to do that?

7) What does this mean? Are they going to make lying illegal? Are we going to get rid of our adversarial form of criminal justice? I don't think I want my government working to develop my moral conscience.

8) This reads like a call for more affirmative action. I'm not a big fan of animal rights. In fact this whole platform seems to want to put permafrost, puppies and Peruvians on equal footing with the concerns of American voters.

9) Another plank with zero impact except to point out to bagdropper that liberals also believe in personal responsibility with the same banality.

10) We get a clue into their new economic system if we are going to "unmake" everything we make that should boost jobs. For that to be profitable they must be planning to tax the crap out of fresh raw resources.

So many questions. So much of this just seems like trite platitudes with no real plan to get anything done. I don't think I'm a green.
 
Originally posted by naturalmwa:
Most of these are so vaguely written that I have no idea if I agree or not.

1) This sounds fine on its face, but it seems purposely worded to avoid supporting the idea of constitutionally protected minority rights. There are times we all want people to be subject to the will of another.

2) What is that first sentence trying to say? It reads to me like its calling for some sort of georgian or socialist economic system. But contextually that seems out of place with the 2nd part calling for non-discrimination.

3) Sounds fine until you figure food production would plummet. What is the solution for the problems this platform causes?

4) I agree.

5) There are a few things to quibble with here. I agree that centralization of wealth leads to economic injustice. I'm not sure the link to environmental or military injustice is intrinsic however and thus decentralizing may not address either. They then go on to say that what ever they want to do about the issue should be done by the individual. To me that reads like they don't want to actually do anything about decentralization other then encourage people to voluntarily give their money and power away.

6) This is another one that generally sounds nice, but what changes are they going to make to allow all this economic growth and prosperity? To achieve the conditions they want, their system must make more than our current one, right? So how are they planning to do that?

7) What does this mean? Are they going to make lying illegal? Are we going to get rid of our adversarial form of criminal justice? I don't think I want my government working to develop my moral conscience.

8) This reads like a call for more affirmative action. I'm not a big fan of animal rights. In fact this whole platform seems to want to put permafrost, puppies and Peruvians on equal footing with the concerns of American voters.

9) Another plank with zero impact except to point out to bagdropper that liberals also believe in personal responsibility with the same banality.

10) We get a clue into their new economic system if we are going to "unmake" everything we make that should boost jobs. For that to be profitable they must be planning to tax the crap out of fresh raw resources.

So many questions. So much of this just seems like trite platitudes with no real plan to get anything done. I don't think I'm a green.
Actually, you sound more like a cross between Habah and Lone Clone. Ignoring the obvious intent and pointing out word meanings to quibble over as bases for rejecting the obvious thrust of many points. I'm rather surprised. Are you spending too much time on HROT?
 
Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:

Actually, you sound more like a cross between Habah and Lone Clone. Ignoring the obvious intent and pointing out word meanings to quibble over as bases for rejecting the obvious thrust of many points. I'm rather surprised. Are you spending too much time on HROT?
You're not an Iowa fan so I will try to be patient. That's what is known as a lob pass which was a staple in Dr. Tom's offense. Not only did you manage to let the pass go out of bounds, you also managed to foul out. I was giving you a platform to explain these ideas which obviously mean a good deal to you, but rather than seize on the opportunity to debate them you chose to let your thread die.
 
Originally posted by naturalmwa:

Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:

Actually, you sound more like a cross between Habah and Lone Clone. Ignoring the obvious intent and pointing out word meanings to quibble over as bases for rejecting the obvious thrust of many points. I'm rather surprised. Are you spending too much time on HROT?
You're not an Iowa fan so I will try to be patient. That's what is known as a lob pass which was a staple in Dr. Tom's offense. Not only did you manage to let the pass go out of bounds, you also managed to foul out. I was giving you a platform to explain these ideas which obviously mean a good deal to you, but rather than seize on the opportunity to debate them you chose to let your thread die.
Aw gee, I thought I was playing defense.

As for explaining the positions, I don't really think I need to explain them to you and it wouldn't do any good to explain them to our cons.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT