This is the second poll in a series about the outcome of the Iowa-PSU Dual.
Part I was posted in October. The HR had 107 (62%) votes for Iowa winning the dual, with by far the most common margin-of-victory prediction being 1-4 pts (66% of Iowa votes). Responses suggested Iowa was more likely to have team points deducted.
What we now know with more confidence:
• Iowa's intended 133 will be DeSanto and not Teasdale
• Iowa's intended 141 is most likely
Murin, and not DeSanto
• PSU's intended 184 is Brooks and not Rasheed
• PSU's intended 197 is most likely Rasheed and notCassar Conel
New uncertainties:
• PSU's 285
• KMF's assertion that Spencer Lee will not compete in NCAA wrestling the remainder of the season, now that he is qualified for OTT.
As we head into Midlands, what are folks predicting for the dual outcome, now?
[Note: Two votes are allowed -- one is intended for team winner, the other for who is more likely to lose team points.]
Part I was posted in October. The HR had 107 (62%) votes for Iowa winning the dual, with by far the most common margin-of-victory prediction being 1-4 pts (66% of Iowa votes). Responses suggested Iowa was more likely to have team points deducted.
What we now know with more confidence:
• Iowa's intended 133 will be DeSanto and not Teasdale
• Iowa's intended 141 is most likely
Murin, and not DeSanto
• PSU's intended 184 is Brooks and not Rasheed
• PSU's intended 197 is most likely Rasheed and not
New uncertainties:
• PSU's 285
• KMF's assertion that Spencer Lee will not compete in NCAA wrestling the remainder of the season, now that he is qualified for OTT.
As we head into Midlands, what are folks predicting for the dual outcome, now?
[Note: Two votes are allowed -- one is intended for team winner, the other for who is more likely to lose team points.]
Last edited: