ADVERTISEMENT

POLL: What does the QB change do for you as a fan?

Aegon_Targaryen

HR All-American
Gold Member
Apr 19, 2014
4,113
416
83
Let's see if we can get a consensus view of what us Iowa fans/alum think about this change.
 
Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:

Let's see if we can get a consensus view of what us Iowa fans/alum think about this change.
I'm looking for the "glad it happened but pissed it took so long for this coaching staff to see what everyone else could clearly see" option.
 
since JR has not ben officially been announced as leaving, I feel he will end up the starter, just because CJ is named the starter FOR THE SPRING PRACTICE, DOES NOT mean he will be the starter this fall, the spring 2 deeps change all the time.

also Coaches at every school does this to use as MOTIVATION to make players work harder to get better, if not throwing the dep ball was a mental thing with JR now is the time to work on that, if it is a ARM STRENGTH maybe its time to hit the weight room harder with Doyle,

who knows it might have been a confidence thing in/with his receivers. remember GD and Kennedy started giving the Receivers more lee way in how they can run their routes. when you are QB that is taught to throw from point A to point B that can shake up things for a QB , when a WR can change their routes on the fly. now the QB as to adjust as well,

it is one thing to say do it, but it is something different when it comes to doing it,

and as so many keep saying MW was a FB playing RB when IA had no other healthy RB available to use. the 2015 season right now has 5 RB's to choose from and 1 coming in in June and 4 of them have the biggest thing that has been missing and that is BREAK AWAY SPEED.

Canzeri was 4.4 but is down to about 4.5
Parker 4.4 40
Wadley 4.4 40
Graham 4.4 40

that is a lot faster than MW 5.65 40
This post was edited on 3/11 12:45 PM by Hawkeye2222
 
2014 Statistics

RudockCJ.jpg

bilde
 
Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:

Let's see if we can get a consensus view of what us Iowa fans/alum think about this change.
Since less than a half percent of Iowa fans/alum ever look at this site, let alone your stupid poll, you are not getting a 'consensus' of what they think.
You'll get a few votes from the other idiots that actually read anything you post
AEGON_I.jpg

This is really how you see yourself, isn't it? You are probably dressed up as we speak, lol
You are important and my hero,
happy0030.r191677.gif



This post was edited on 3/11 12:47 PM by MattFoleyHawk
 
Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:

since JR has not ben officially been announced as leaving, I feel he will end up the starter, just because CJ is named the starter FOR THE SPRING PRACTICE, DOES NOT mean he will be the starter this fall, the spring 2 deeps change all the time.

also Coaches at every school does this to use as MOTIVATION to make players work harder to get better, if not throwing the dep ball was a mental thing with JR now is the time to work on that, if it is a ARM STRENGTH maybe its time to hit the weight room harder with Doyle,

who knows it might have been a confidence thing in/with his receivers. remember GD and Kennedy started giving the Receivers more lee way in how they can run their routes. when you are QB that is taught to throw from point A to point B that can shake up things for a QB , when a WR can change their routes on the fly. now the QB as to adjust as well,

it is one thing to say do it, but it is something different when it comes to doing it,

and as so many keep saying MW was a FB playing RB when IA had no other healthy RB available to use. the 2015 season right now has 5 RB's to choose from and 1 coming in in June and 4 of them have the biggest thing that has been missing and that is BREAK AWAY SPEED.

Canzeri was 4.4 but is down to about 4.5
Parker 4.4 40
Wadley 4.4 40
Graham 4.4 40

that is a lot faster than MW 5.65 40
This post was edited on 3/11 12:45 PM by Hawkeye2222
2222 here is a bet for you. If CJ is starter this fall you will never post here (sadly we know you still would under another name) and if Rudock starts vice versa here. How about it since you are so confident and in denial about him leaving.
 
Thread about QB change at Iowa, here's what 2222 bring to the table:

Canzeri was 4.4 but is down to about 4.5
Parker 4.4 40
Wadley 4.4 40
Graham 4.4 40

that is a lot faster than MW 5.65 40
You forgot the stars dumbass.

WTF!!
 
Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:

since JR has not ben officially been announced as leaving, I feel he will end up the starter, just because CJ is named the starter FOR THE SPRING PRACTICE, DOES NOT mean he will be the starter this fall, the spring 2 deeps change all the time.

also Coaches at every school does this to use as MOTIVATION to make players work harder to get better, if not throwing the dep ball was a mental thing with JR now is the time to work on that, if it is a ARM STRENGTH maybe its time to hit the weight room harder with Doyle,

who knows it might have been a confidence thing in/with his receivers. remember GD and Kennedy started giving the Receivers more lee way in how they can run their routes. when you are QB that is taught to throw from point A to point B that can shake up things for a QB , when a WR can change their routes on the fly. now the QB as to adjust as well,

it is one thing to say do it, but it is something different when it comes to doing it,

and as so many keep saying MW was a FB playing RB when IA had no other healthy RB available to use. the 2015 season right now has 5 RB's to choose from and 1 coming in in June and 4 of them have the biggest thing that has been missing and that is BREAK AWAY SPEED.

Canzeri was 4.4 but is down to about 4.5
Parker 4.4 40
Wadley 4.4 40
Graham 4.4 40

that is a lot faster than MW 5.65 40
This post was edited on 3/11 12:45 PM by Hawkeye2222
Just heard Murph and Andy on KXNO say that both fox sports and Sports Illustrated are reporting that Jake is transferring from Iowa and will be visiting Michigan next week.
 
Originally posted by TankHawk:

Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:

since JR has not ben officially been announced as leaving, I feel he will end up the starter, just because CJ is named the starter FOR THE SPRING PRACTICE, DOES NOT mean he will be the starter this fall, the spring 2 deeps change all the time.

also Coaches at every school does this to use as MOTIVATION to make players work harder to get better, if not throwing the dep ball was a mental thing with JR now is the time to work on that, if it is a ARM STRENGTH maybe its time to hit the weight room harder with Doyle,

who knows it might have been a confidence thing in/with his receivers. remember GD and Kennedy started giving the Receivers more lee way in how they can run their routes. when you are QB that is taught to throw from point A to point B that can shake up things for a QB , when a WR can change their routes on the fly. now the QB as to adjust as well,

it is one thing to say do it, but it is something different when it comes to doing it,

and as so many keep saying MW was a FB playing RB when IA had no other healthy RB available to use. the 2015 season right now has 5 RB's to choose from and 1 coming in in June and 4 of them have the biggest thing that has been missing and that is BREAK AWAY SPEED.

Canzeri was 4.4 but is down to about 4.5
Parker 4.4 40
Wadley 4.4 40
Graham 4.4 40

that is a lot faster than MW 5.65 40

This post was edited on 3/11 12:45 PM by Hawkeye2222
Just heard Murph and Andy on KXNO say that both fox sports and Sports Illustrated are reporting that Jake is transferring from Iowa and will be visiting Michigan next week.
I asked Blair when an official statement will come out from the University and he said nothing will likely happen until March 25th, which is the date of the spring presser.
 
Im happy for both because both are quality QB's capable of playing at a high level. CJB obviously has more physical talent. Jake has more experience and makes smarter decisions (according to the coaching staff -- bottom line, both QB's are told what to do, and Jake is the one that is able to make the right decisions more often).

I'm mainly happy because now we won't have to go through another season of fighting amongst Iowa fans about who the better QB is.
 
I'm betting more than 1 Iowa QB will play significant snaps next year. CJ's style will get himself killed playing a full season.
 
QB change?

Operative word is "fan", specifically do for you as a fan. I have always been and will always be "fan", a HAWKEYE FAN.

For me, the question, as asked, it is not really that difficult or mind bending.
 
My first thought is I'm very happy that CJ will get to be our starter next year. My second thought is just how bad of a recruiter Brady H. must have been if he couldn't bring in a QB that wouldn't be able to beat out Jake. After all this is Michigan with every edge with 4 and 5 star recruits. I just can't imagine that the Jake I've watched the last two years can go in and guide Michigan to very much success.
 
Need an option, "excited for both opportunities for these young men." Beathard's release excites me(best I have seen at Iowa). Ruddock was a damn good college QB and will be enjoying the best of both worlds, 1.) an outstanding postgraduate medical program 2.) being a starting QB a Michigan.
 
I personally wish they both would leave. Both of them want to run from competition and piss and moan, so both can leave and we can roll with Wiegers. But that's just my opinion
 
Originally posted by redman21:
I personally wish they both would leave. Both of them want to run from competition and piss and moan, so both can leave and we can roll with Wiegers. But that's just my opinion
That's an interesting thing to say. I probably should have used that option also. I'm very interested to see how Wiegers eventually figures into the mix.
 
Originally posted by iahawkeyes17:


Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:

since JR has not ben officially been announced as leaving, I feel he will end up the starter, just because CJ is named the starter FOR THE SPRING PRACTICE, DOES NOT mean he will be the starter this fall, the spring 2 deeps change all the time.

also Coaches at every school does this to use as MOTIVATION to make players work harder to get better, if not throwing the dep ball was a mental thing with JR now is the time to work on that, if it is a ARM STRENGTH maybe its time to hit the weight room harder with Doyle,

who knows it might have been a confidence thing in/with his receivers. remember GD and Kennedy started giving the Receivers more lee way in how they can run their routes. when you are QB that is taught to throw from point A to point B that can shake up things for a QB , when a WR can change their routes on the fly. now the QB as to adjust as well,

it is one thing to say do it, but it is something different when it comes to doing it,

and as so many keep saying MW was a FB playing RB when IA had no other healthy RB available to use. the 2015 season right now has 5 RB's to choose from and 1 coming in in June and 4 of them have the biggest thing that has been missing and that is BREAK AWAY SPEED.

Canzeri was 4.4 but is down to about 4.5
Parker 4.4 40
Wadley 4.4 40
Graham 4.4 40

that is a lot faster than MW 5.65 40

This post was edited on 3/11 12:45 PM by Hawkeye2222
2222 here is a bet for you. If CJ is starter this fall you will never post here (sadly we know you still would under another name) and if Rudock starts vice versa here. How about it since you are so confident and in denial about him leaving.
We're all waiting for your answer Kilroy. Time to put up or shut up !
 
Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:

since JR has not ben officially been announced as leaving, I feel he will end up the starter, just because CJ is named the starter FOR THE SPRING PRACTICE, DOES NOT mean he will be the starter this fall, the spring 2 deeps change all the time.

also Coaches at every school does this to use as MOTIVATION to make players work harder to get better, if not throwing the dep ball was a mental thing with JR now is the time to work on that, if it is a ARM STRENGTH maybe its time to hit the weight room harder with Doyle,

who knows it might have been a confidence thing in/with his receivers. remember GD and Kennedy started giving the Receivers more lee way in how they can run their routes. when you are QB that is taught to throw from point A to point B that can shake up things for a QB , when a WR can change their routes on the fly. now the QB as to adjust as well,

it is one thing to say do it, but it is something different when it comes to doing it,

and as so many keep saying MW was a FB playing RB when IA had no other healthy RB available to use. the 2015 season right now has 5 RB's to choose from and 1 coming in in June and 4 of them have the biggest thing that has been missing and that is BREAK AWAY SPEED.

Canzeri was 4.4 but is down to about 4.5
Parker 4.4 40
Wadley 4.4 40
Graham 4.4 40


that is a lot faster than MW 5.65 40
This post was edited on 3/11 12:45 PM by Hawkeye2222
jMpt3.gif
 
How in the hell with all those options was there not one titled something like:

Reading the posts from all the Idiots calling for Tyler Weiggers.
 
Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:

Originally posted by redman21:
I personally wish they both would leave. Both of them want to run from competition and piss and moan, so both can leave and we can roll with Wiegers. But that's just my opinion
That's an interesting thing to say. I probably should have used that option also. I'm very interested to see how Wiegers eventually figures into the mix.
By the end of September at the latest, "knowledgeable" fans will be demanding that he be the starter.
 
Originally posted by Chewback:

Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:

Originally posted by redman21:
I personally wish they both would leave. Both of them want to run from competition and piss and moan, so both can leave and we can roll with Wiegers. But that's just my opinion
That's an interesting thing to say. I probably should have used that option also. I'm very interested to see how Wiegers eventually figures into the mix.
By the end of September at the latest, "knowledgeable" fans will be demanding that he be the starter.
Oh,... you mean those same "knowledgeable" fans that called for CJB last year? Who was right on that one?
 
Need to vote twice for: CJ Show and Fire Kirk.

Have been ready for the CJ show since the 2nd half heroic comeback against Pitt. Kirk needs fired sooner than later. His loyalty and costing the team potential wins is obvious. No coach would keep Jake in half those games he struggled. We as fans have been dealing with his stubbornness for years. So ready for his tenure to come to an end right along with Barta. CJ may buy Kirk a few more years though how ironic would that be!

Wish Jake the best at the big house! Could be a good fit for him. Think this move will help everyone involved unless CJ goes down then there could be trouble in IA City. Nothing we aren't used too....
 
It gets me a little excited because I think cj has a little renegade in him which at some point may show through in the play. (Example. Coach calls for a knee with 30 sec left, cj throws a bomb) I dont know this to be true but I love to hope that it is. I also think there is a certain amount of who cares if the badge is a lincoln or mercury its still a ford...... meaning its still a qb in kf's system.
 
Originally posted by icantfindausernamethatisntused:

Im happy for both because both are quality QB's capable of playing at a high level. CJB obviously has more physical talent. Jake has more experience and makes smarter decisions (according to the coaching staff -- bottom line, both QB's are told what to do, and Jake is the one that is able to make the right decisions more often).

I'm mainly happy because now we won't have to go through another season of fighting amongst Iowa fans about who the better QB is.
Yep.
 
Originally posted by eddie4star:
It doesn't matter who the qb is when you have an incompetent fool in charge.
Say it to his face, gutless punk!

Another anonymous message board genius.. And you guys wonder what I keep talking about?


It's no different here than what this columnist is talking about:











Columnist Leonard Pitts writes:
http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/.a/6a00d83451b4ba69e20133ec628340970b-pi Far from validating some high-minded ideal of public debate, (newspaper) message boards -- particularly those inadequately policed by their newspapers and/or dealing with highly emotional matters --have become havens for a level of crudity, bigotry, meanness and plain nastiness that shocks the tattered remnants of our propriety.

For every person who offers some trenchant observation on the point at hand, there are a dozen who are so far off point they couldn't find their way back with a compass and road map. For every person who brings up some telling fact, there are a dozen whose ``facts'' are fantasies freshly made up to suit the exigencies of arguments they otherwise cannot win.

Why have message boards failed to live up to the noble expectations?

The answer in a word is, anonymity.
 
Originally posted by MattFoleyHawk:
Originally posted by eddie4star:
It doesn't matter who the qb is when you have an incompetent fool in charge.
Say it to his face, gutless punk!

Another anonymous message board genius.. And you guys wonder what I keep talking about?


It's no different here than what this columnist is talking about:











Columnist Leonard Pitts writes:
http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/.a/6a00d83451b4ba69e20133ec628340970b-pi Far from validating some high-minded ideal of public debate, (newspaper) message boards -- particularly those inadequately policed by their newspapers and/or dealing with highly emotional matters --have become havens for a level of crudity, bigotry, meanness and plain nastiness that shocks the tattered remnants of our propriety.

For every person who offers some trenchant observation on the point at hand, there are a dozen who are so far off point they couldn't find their way back with a compass and road map. For every person who brings up some telling fact, there are a dozen whose ``facts'' are fantasies freshly made up to suit the exigencies of arguments they otherwise cannot win.

Why have message boards failed to live up to the noble expectations?

The answer in a word is, anonymity.
Set up a time and place dummy. He is a clueless fool.
 
Not knowing JR, his stats last yr was pretty impressive. I've heard he can't go deep, weak arm? What is the probs he had at Iowa. 60%, 16 vs 5 incepts, sounds really good to me. Iowa fans are obv happy he's history, just wondering why.
 
Originally posted by candid:
Not knowing JR, his stats last yr was pretty impressive. I've heard he can't go deep, weak arm? What is the probs he had at Iowa. 60%, 16 vs 5 incepts, sounds really good to me. Iowa fans are obv happy he's history, just wondering why.
Weaknesses:

Seems to be quick to check down. His arm is an issue and many of his deep throws were floaters that were easy to pick off. At times he would get rattled and couldn't seem to shake out of it. Noticed on more than a few occasions that he would completely not see a wide open receiver.(There were a couple games this year, where the announcers pointed this out. Also, he got injured quite a bit here and there. Nothing too serious, but he was always getting banged up, and missed a few games in both his starting seasons because of it.

Academic schedule made it difficult for him to stay on the teams schedule, and the team had to adjust to his at times. Nothing wrong with it, but it does probably cause problems.

Whether his faults were all him, or a combination of his lack of arm and coaching is up for debate. If he goes to Michigan and gets a chance to start, we will find out. Harbaugh likes a more aggressive approach to the passing game, powered with a strong running game.

Strengths: Could be very accurate at times, and seemed to make quick decisions. Could get yards with his feet when needed. Did in fact seem to thrive in desperation at times.......just not often enough. Smart, will learn a playbook quick.

Seems to thrive IMO when he's allowed to just play and attack. The coaching strategy though is very conservative at times, and GD's pass calling often calls for short routes, despite where the 1st down marker is.

He's good.
 
Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:


Originally posted by candid:
Not knowing JR, his stats last yr was pretty impressive. I've heard he can't go deep, weak arm? What is the probs he had at Iowa. 60%, 16 vs 5 incepts, sounds really good to me. Iowa fans are obv happy he's history, just wondering why.
Weaknesses:

Seems to be quick to check down. His arm is an issue and many of his deep throws were floaters that were easy to pick off. At times he would get rattled and couldn't seem to shake out of it. Noticed on more than a few occasions that he would completely not see a wide open receiver.(There were a couple games this year, where the announcers pointed this out. Also, he got injured quite a bit here and there. Nothing too serious, but he was always getting banged up, and missed a few games in both his starting seasons because of it.

Academic schedule made it difficult for him to stay on the teams schedule, and the team had to adjust to his at times. Nothing wrong with it, but it does probably cause problems.

Whether his faults were all him, or a combination of his lack of arm and coaching is up for debate. If he goes to Michigan and gets a chance to start, we will find out. Harbaugh likes a moreaggressive approach to the passing game, powered with a strong running game.

Strengths: Could be very accurate at times, and seemed to make quick decisions. Could get yards with his feet when needed. Did in fact seem to thrive in desperation at times.......just not often enough. Smart, will learn a playbook quick.

Seems to thrive IMO when he's allowed to just play and attack. The coaching strategy though is very conservative at times, and GD's pass calling often calls for short routes, despite where the 1st down marker is.

He's good.
Seriously, why do you come on here and act like some expert analyst, when you clearly have no idea what you are talking about except for what you heard a couple anouncers say. What was his arm 'issue'? Evidence? (everyone knows that, right, lol)
He didn't 'float' his deep balls and MANY (as you say) were not picked off. Fact. He only threw 5 int's and I can't think of one of them that was a 'deep' ball except Pitt (longer than 24 yds.).. If the were so many deep balls easy to pick off, why weren't they? I'm not going to go on, but do you really think anyone takes your analysis seriously? Why do you act like you know what you're talking about? You really need attention that bad?
That's what Harbaugh likes? lmao. "Duh, He like to pass and run"! lmao. Really? You just described every coach. Is there such a thing as wanting a 'passive' passing attack and a 'weak' running game. You really don't have any idea how complicated big time football is, do you? You speak about it like 7th graders. If I started talking schemes and X's and O's to you, I would lose you in about 40 seconds and Greg Davis would lose you after his introduction. Quit embarrasing yourself and just watch the games with your buddies, if you have any, Good grief......
This post was edited on 3/20 5:10 AM by MattFoleyHawk
 
I've been calling for the change since the 2014 Iowa State game. Rudock contracted the offense with his arm strength. That will not be an issue with Beathard as he has a lightning quick release and a laser arm. CJ will be able to get Tevaun and the TEs involved downfield, and hopefully Scheel will be ready to go. Recruiting really needs to improve at WR, but I'm optimistic.
 
Originally posted by MattFoleyHawk:


Seriously, why do you come on here and act like some expert analyst, when you clearly have no idea what you are talking about except for what you heard a couple anouncers say. What was his arm 'issue'? Evidence? (everyone knows that, right, lol)
He didn't 'float' his deep balls and MANY (as you say) were not picked off. Fact. He only threw 5 int's and I can't think of one of them that was a 'deep' ball except Pitt (longer than 24 yds.).. If the were so many deep balls easy to pick off, why weren't they? I'm not going to go on, but do you really think anyone takes your analysis seriously? Why do you act like you know what you're talking about? You really need attention that bad?
That's what Harbaugh likes? lmao. "Duh, He like to pass and run"! lmao. Really? You just described every coach. Is there such a thing as wanting a 'passive' passing attack and a 'weak' running game. You really don't have any idea how complicated big time football is, do you? You speak about it like 7th graders. If I started talking schemes and X's and O's to you, I would lose you in about 40 seconds and Greg Davis would lose you after his introduction. Quit embarrasing yourself and just watch the games with your buddies, if you have any, Good grief......

This post was edited on 3/20 5:10 AM by MattFoleyHawk(Matty needs to get laid)


There's nothing I typed that was incorrect Matty. This analysis, isn't just mine, but the the analysis of many. Matty, there are an unusual number of Fuskers on this board. Go get them. You supposedly hate 'wanna-be experts', so they should be right down your alley.

Go get banned on their board, if you really want to be one of us.BTW, if you DO want to talk X's and O's, by all means let's do it.

I keep it down when talking on here, for the sake of being understandable. Also, go get laid and relax a little bit. Squeeze one off if you have to.

Also, speak when spoken to Matty, that's what good little girls do.
This post was edited on 3/20 8:25 AM by Aegon_Targaryen
 
Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:

Originally posted by MattFoleyHawk:


Seriously, why do you come on here and act like some expert analyst, when you clearly have no idea what you are talking about except for what you heard a couple anouncers say. What was his arm 'issue'? Evidence? (everyone knows that, right, lol)
He didn't 'float' his deep balls and MANY (as you say) were not picked off. Fact. He only threw 5 int's and I can't think of one of them that was a 'deep' ball except Pitt (longer than 24 yds.).. If the were so many deep balls easy to pick off, why weren't they? I'm not going to go on, but do you really think anyone takes your analysis seriously? Why do you act like you know what you're talking about? You really need attention that bad?
That's what Harbaugh likes? lmao. "Duh, He like to pass and run"! lmao. Really? You just described every coach. Is there such a thing as wanting a 'passive' passing attack and a 'weak' running game. You really don't have any idea how complicated big time football is, do you? You speak about it like 7th graders. If I started talking schemes and X's and O's to you, I would lose you in about 40 seconds and Greg Davis would lose you after his introduction. Quit embarrasing yourself and just watch the games with your buddies, if you have any, Good grief......

This post was edited on 3/20 5:10 AM by MattFoleyHawk(Matty needs to get laid)

There's nothing I typed that was incorrect Matty. This analysis, isn't just mine, but the the analysis of many. Matty, there are an unusual number of Fuskers on this board. Go get them. You supposedly hate 'wanna-be experts', so they should be right down your alley.

Go get banned on their board, if you really want to be one of us.BTW, if you DO want to talk X's and O's, by all means let's do it.

I keep it down when talking on here, for the sake of being understandable. Also, go get laid and relax a little bit. Squeeze one off if you have to.

Also, speak when spoken to Matty, that's what good little girls do.

This post was edited on 3/20 8:25 AM by Aegon_Targaryen
What you said about interceptions is totally inaccurate, as I have already demonstrated. It's irrefutable. If you are going to state that it's the analysis of many, you need to cite them and they must be credible, not other 'message board hero's'.

Ok, let's talk Hawkeye X's and O's! Iowa is on defense. The opposing team comes out in one back, trips right with a single reciever to the left. The mike gives a strong right call. Where does 1tech line up? What is his responsibilty? Does he play a 1 gap or 2 gap technique? Where does the leo line up? When would he use a 'fold' technique? What is his coverage responsiblity? The FS gives quarters coverage call. What is quarters coverage? Don't look it up, you should know this! Where does the SS line up? What is his responsiblilty? Who are the 'force' players depending on flow? List the allignment, technique, and responsiblities for the entire defense. Hurry, Hurry, Mr. I want to talk X's and O's, lol. You have no idea what I'm even talking about, lol....
Should we move to the offense? lol. A '22' call is given from the sideline, what does it mean? The offense is in a balanced formation, the QB 'checks' the direction of the play. Why? What is he looking at? What is a 'read' route? What determines the route adjustment? When and why is a 'tag' call made? Come on, hurry up! How long have you been coaching? What is your training and education?
Just watch the games son, you have no idea...
You keep it down NOW since I put you in your place. You apparently forgot already how you used to post and things you've said?
You have no idea who I actually am and I guaranty you don't ever want to meet me:)
 
Originally posted by the foolish and sexually frustrated MattFoleyHawk:

What you said about interceptions is totally inaccurate, as I have already demonstrated. It's irrefutable. If you are going to state that it's the analysis of many, you need to cite them and they must be credible, not other 'message board hero's'.

Ok, let's talk Hawkeye X's and O's! Iowa is on defense. The opposing team comes out in one back, trips right with a single reciever to the left. The mike gives a strong right call. Where does 1tech line up? What is his responsibilty? Does he play a 1 gap or 2 gap technique? Where does the leo line up? When would he use a 'fold' technique? What is his coverage responsiblity? The FS gives quarters coverage call. What is quarters coverage? Don't look it up, you should know this! Where does the SS line up? What is his responsiblilty? Who are the 'force' players depending on flow? List the allignment, technique, and responsiblities for the entire defense. Hurry, Hurry, Mr. I want to talk X's and O's, lol. You have no idea what I'm even talking about, lol....
Should we move to the offense? lol. A '22' call is given from the sideline, what does it mean? The offense is in a balanced formation, the QB 'checks' the direction of the play. Why? What is he looking at? What is a 'read' route? What determines the route adjustment? When and why is a 'tag' call made? Come on, hurry up! How long have you been coaching? What is your training and education?
Just watch the games son, you have no idea...
You keep it down NOW since I put you in your place. You apparently forgot already how you used to post and things you've said?
You have no idea who I actually am and I guaranty you don't ever want to meet me:)




Listen girly, I allowed you to speak, and now that you have you may quiet down. What you typed here, which is okay, I guess, has one glaring issue, before I can answer any of this.

I could easily disseminate this, hell, any 12 year old with google could do that. But why, Matty, is there an issue with what you are requesting here. Answer that question, and you will receive your education. Make it quick because I don't have all day.

Also, you can't put anyone in their place from the corner Matty. You are already in yours.

Now please don't try and play internet tough guy here Matty. You're not strong enough mentally, to make me think you're any sort of threat physically. Now be a good little girl and answer uncle Aegons request. I have other work for you by the way, so be ready to put time in. This isn't a request.
This post was edited on 3/20 11:02 AM by Aegon_Targaryen
 
Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:


Originally posted by the foolish and sexually frustrated MattFoleyHawk:


What you said about interceptions is totally inaccurate, as I have already demonstrated. It's irrefutable. If you are going to state that it's the analysis of many, you need to cite them and they must be credible, not other 'message board hero's'.

Ok, let's talk Hawkeye X's and O's! Iowa is on defense. The opposing team comes out in one back, trips right with a single reciever to the left. The mike gives a strong right call. Where does 1tech line up? What is his responsibilty? Does he play a 1 gap or 2 gap technique? Where does the leo line up? When would he use a 'fold' technique? What is his coverage responsiblity? The FS gives quarters coverage call. What is quarters coverage? Don't look it up, you should know this! Where does the SS line up? What is his responsiblilty? Who are the 'force' players depending on flow? List the allignment, technique, and responsiblities for the entire defense. Hurry, Hurry, Mr. I want to talk X's and O's, lol. You have no idea what I'm even talking about, lol....
Should we move to the offense? lol. A '22' call is given from the sideline, what does it mean? The offense is in a balanced formation, the QB 'checks' the direction of the play. Why? What is he looking at? What is a 'read' route? What determines the route adjustment? When and why is a 'tag' call made? Come on, hurry up! How long have you been coaching? What is your training and education?
Just watch the games son, you have no idea...
You keep it down NOW since I put you in your place. You apparently forgot already how you used to post and things you've said?
You have no idea who I actually am and I guaranty you don't ever want to meet me:)






Listen girly, I allowed you to speak, and now that you have you may quiet down. What you typed here, which is okay, I guess, has one glaring issue, before I can answer any of this.

I could easily disseminate this, hell, any 12 year old with google could do that. But why, Matty, is there an issue with what you are requesting here. Answer that question, and you will receive your education. Make it quick because I don't have all day.

Also, you can't put anyone in their place from the corner Matty. You are already in yours.

Now please don't try and play internet tough guy here Matty. You're not strong enough mentally, to make me think you're any sort of threat physically. Now be a good little girl and answer uncle Aegons request. I have other work for you by the way, so be ready to put time in. This isn't a request.


This post was edited on 3/20 11:02 AM by Aegon_Targaryen
You said you wanted to TALK X's and O's, not have your 12 yr. old google everything I asked. I didnt' LOOK anything up, don't have to. To TALK X's and O's, you have to be able to reel it off the top of your head. I don't need the internet to TALK any of this, as I have learned it over the years coaching and through numerous camps and clinics, especially the Hawkeye clinics. That is why I can reel it off in seconds, and am QUALIFIED TO TELL YOU IDIOTS YOU DON'T HAVE A CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. You won't find most of this on the internet since terminology is different from coach to coach, team to team. You're an idiot, like all these other 'geniuses' on this site, and have no idea about 'technique' or what anybody is supposed to do on any given play, thus making it impossible for you to evaluate anything. YOU SAID YOU WANTED TO TALK X'S AND O'S, you shouldn't have to look up anything. When coaches talk x's and o's they don't sit there with a smartphone looking up what each other are saying. lmao!
Nice try. You don't have any idea what I even said and without practicle application, it wouldn't mean anything even if you could find anything about it on the net.
Hang it up junior, and stick with dressing up and playing 'thrones' with your other loser friends.
You started this 'tough guy' thing months ago, threatening me on numerous occasions and continue to take personal shots at me, with my point being, I assure you, you wouldn't if you met me!
This post was edited on 3/20 12:30 PM by MattFoleyHawk
 
P.S.- All my questions pertain to the Hawkeyes schemes and terminology, as other teams may play quarters coverage differently, etc... I'm surprised you didn't at least try to answer on question of the top of your head, so that everyone wouldn't think you might not know what your talking about. Lol. Be honest with everyone, You didn't know the answer to one question. It's okay, they all already know you're full of sh*t, and there probably isn't one or two posters on this site that could reel off the answers (maybe none).You want to talk about the Hawkeyes, bring it....lol
This post was edited on 3/20 12:28 PM by MattFoleyHawk
 
Originally posted by MattFoleyHawk:
P.S.- All my questions pertain to the Hawkeyes schemes and terminology, as other teams may play quarters coverage differently, etc... I'm surprised you didn't at least try to answer on question of the top of your head, so that everyone wouldn't think you might not know what your talking about. Lol. Be honest with everyone, You didn't know the answer to one question. It's okay, they all already know you're full of sh*t, and there probably isn't one or two posters on this site that could reel off the answers (maybe none).You want to talk about the Hawkeyes, bring it....lol

This post was edited on 3/20 12:28 PM by MattFoleyHawk
Oh I must definitely would speak to you just like I normally do, whether face to face or not. Listen my favorite little niece, you are being a bad girl on here. It's time we speak about this on serious terms. I want you to be honest with everyone and tell them who you really are.

You tried pulling the fast one with people when you tried convincing them that you were Stanley from Wilmington. Then, and ONLY WHEN you were called out for it, did you play the "I was just joking act". You're silly billy self didn't even make sure that Wilmington existed. You dolt. How dumb can you be Matty?

The question, you asked me, all had one problem. A big one that makes answering them all impossible. What is that problem Matty?

I assigned you a task and you have yet to complete it. I'm not pleased, not at all. I suggest you find a way to correct that. Uncle Aegon is getting irritated. Don't make me tell your mom and dad you're being bad again Matty.

My request is the only one that counts. You are in my position to make demands. Get to work. Now.
 
Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:

Originally posted by MattFoleyHawk:
P.S.- All my questions pertain to the Hawkeyes schemes and terminology, as other teams may play quarters coverage differently, etc... I'm surprised you didn't at least try to answer on question of the top of your head, so that everyone wouldn't think you might not know what your talking about. Lol. Be honest with everyone, You didn't know the answer to one question. It's okay, they all already know you're full of sh*t, and there probably isn't one or two posters on this site that could reel off the answers (maybe none).You want to talk about the Hawkeyes, bring it....lol


This post was edited on 3/20 12:28 PM by MattFoleyHawk
Oh I must definitely would speak to you just like I normally do, whether face to face or not. Listen my favorite little niece, you are being a bad girl on here. It's time we speak about this on serious terms. I want you to be honest with everyone and tell them who you really are.

You tried pulling the fast one with people when you tried convincing them that you were Stanley from Wilmington. Then, and ONLY WHEN you were called out for it, did you play the "I was just joking act". You're silly billy self didn't even make sure that Wilmington existed. You dolt. How dumb can you be Matty?

The question, you asked me, all had one problem. A big one that makes answering them all impossible. What is that problem Matty?

I assigned you a task and you have yet to complete it. I'm not pleased, not at all. I suggest you find a way to correct that. Uncle Aegon is getting irritated. Don't make me tell your mom and dad you're being bad again Matty.

My request is the only one that counts. You are in my position to make demands. Get to work. Now.
The only problem is that you don't know the answers. You are a pretender, but you're a tencacious little wannabe. I told you months ago that I really lived in Winchestertonfieldville, IA and I am related to Babe Bennett. Please try to keep up!.
I laughed the whole time I typed in Stanley fom Wilmington, you fvcking idiot (I don't even remember what last name I gave). I've explained this numerous time, Please try to keep up. I wanted to see how many people would actually look it up and it was hilarious reading the posts about 'how they couldn't find it', and 3 people said to use google maps, etc. I was sitting at my local watering hole and a couple friends helped me come up with the name and town and laughed at how easily duped you cretins are. But when it comes to coaching football, I'm all business....
Games over, thanks for playing. You lose.....
P.S. - Don't forget to get signed up for the Game of Thrones convention in Ohio, May 15-17!!! You can actually get dressed up and play amongst your own, instead of sitting in the basement, playing with yourself:)
 
Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:

Let's see if we can get a consensus view of what us Iowa fans/alum think about this change
Who am I really? I'll give you a hint. A lot of people on this site probably know me or at least have heard of me. Hmmm.....
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT