I never said McC's first 5 years were a gimme. His first 2 were not going to be good but he has battled pretty well after that with .500 or better B1G seasons except for 2017-2018.
And ow many coaches making more than McC have gone further in the NCAA Tournament with their B10 teams?
Izzo is Izzo.
Hoiberg hasn't done squat yet at NE. As usual, he has a lot of turnover every year he coaches so using turnover as an is just an excuse.
Underwood has only made it to the round of 32 at IL with arguably better talent
Archie is gone, but while at IN, he never even made it to the NCAAs, even with arguably better talent
Holtmann has only made it to the round of 32 at OH State with arguably better talent
Turgeon took MD to the Sweet 16, but with arguably better talent.
Chris Collins has only made it to the round of 32 at Northwestern and only finished above 5th once in the B1G
Painter has done very well. He had the luxury of following a legend but he built on that and has done very well.
Other than Izzo, Turgeon and Painter, the other 5 coaches have not achieved more than McC even though they are much better situated for recruiting and have had better classes. I would say that means they had worse results based on expectations.
And who cares that Archie Miler beat Iowa twice this year? Iowa swept Izzo, Hoiberg, Turgeon, Painter, and Collins this year. Means nothing.
I have to laugh at your examples of 2 newer head coaches - Gard walked into a great situation at WI which appears to be falling apart now that his recruits are coming in/leaving. And Howard will not be making less than McC for long unless he has a HUGE nosedive or gets caught cheating somehow. In any case, Howard is an exception. He's making less than a lot of coaches with lessor results.
"And ow [sic] many coaches making more than McC have gone further in the NCAA Tournament with their B10 teams?
Izzo is Izzo."
I have to laugh at your limitation of "accomplish" to NCAA tourney wins. Just stop your clownery.
And why limit it to "coaches making more" than Fran. That makes no sense. Gard makes LESS than Fran and has has taken Wisconsin farther AND won a Big Ten regular season title. So has Turgeon. So has Painter, so has first year coach, Howard, lol etc. etc.....
"Hoiberg hasn't done squat yet at NE. As usual, he has a lot of turnover every year he coaches so using turnover as an is just an excuse."
lol Hoiberg has coached for 2 seasons at Nebraska -- 1 which included any tournaments. Fran has coached for ELEVEN YEARS at iowa. It makes no sense to expect anything from Hoiberg at this point (although he has beaten Fran).
"Underwood has only made it to the round of 32 at IL with arguably better talent"
I have to laugh at your limitation of "accomplish" to NCAA tourney wins. In his third try, Underwood has won a Big Ten Tournament title. Fran has yet to do that in 10 tries.
Fran's Big Ten Tournament record is .333. LO F'ing L! Underwood has finished in second place twice in his first four years in the league. Fran has yet to do that even one time in ELEVEN SEASONS. Underwood has accomplished more in four seasons at Illinois than Fran has in ELEVEN SEASONS at iowa.
As for "with arguably better talent" .... I hate to break it to you, pal, but acquiring talent is part of being a good coach.
"Archie is gone, but while at IN, he never even made it to the NCAAs, even with arguably better talent"
Archie has a better record at Indiana that Fran has at iowa (.603 vs. .587), and Archie was fired after 4 seasons because he didn't win anything and couldn't beat Purdue. He beat iowa though and Fran is still here after ELEVEN SEASONS. Funny how some programs fire coaches who don't win anything in less than ELEVEN SEASONS. Those programs are crazy and always end up hiring Todd Lickliter.
"Holtmann has only made it to the round of 32 at OH State with arguably better talent"
In four seasons, Holtman has qualified for the NCAA tournament is every single season. in ELEVEN SEASONS, Fran has never had a four year stretch where he accomplished that. Holtman coached his team to a Big Ten Tournament Final in his first four seasons. Fran has yet to do that in ELEVEN SEASONS. To add insult to injury, Holtmann makes less than Fran.
Again, the "arguably better talent" point is nonsensical. Part of being a winning coach is getting better talent than your competitors. lol
"Turgeon took MD to the Sweet 16, but with arguably better talent."
In seven seasons in the Big Ten, Turgeon has finished second twice and won a Big Ten Regular season Championship. He has a better overall record and a better league record than Fran and he makes LESS money than Fran. In ELEVEN SEASONS at iowa, Fran has never won any kind of title or finished second in the league.
"Chris Collins has only made it to the round of 32 at Northwestern and only finished above 5th once in the B1G"
Indeed. Fran has a better overall record and big ten record than the head coach of Northwestern. Hug your pillow tonight and smile. Hey!, did Fran accomplish all of this greatness "with arguably better talent?" lol
"Painter has done very well."
No shit. lol
"And who cares that Archie Miler beat Iowa twice this year? Iowa swept Izzo, Hoiberg, Turgeon, Painter, and Collins this year. Means nothing."
It means a coach who got his ass booted swept a higher ranked Fran McCaffery coached team. That's what it means.
"I have to laugh at your examples of 2 newer head coaches - Gard walked into a great situation at WI which appears to be falling apart now that his recruits are coming in/leaving."
Laugh all you want. In seven seasons, Gard has been to two Sweet Sixteens, finished second once, and won a Big Ten regular season title. In ELEVEN SEASONS, Fran has been unable to accomplish any of those things even once. As for it "falling apart" lol How much $ will you bet that Iowa finishes above Wisconsin next season?
"And Howard will not be making less than McC for long unless he has a HUGE nosedive or gets caught cheating somehow. In any case, Howard is an exception. He's making less than a lot of coaches with lessor results."
Howard is no exception. He, like all of the coaches discussed above, has accomplished considerably more than Fran has in considerably less time.
I will give Fran one thing, though. There is no better coach in the nation at finding playing time for his own sons. Could that be one of the reasons that almost every coach you discussed above had "arguably better talent?" lol
nah.... couldn't be....
You are not good at this.