ADVERTISEMENT

Quad Cities bridge to finish at $74.5 million over bid

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,386
58,801
113
The new twin spans of the Interstate 74 bridge are being delivered more than a year late and $74 million over bid.

A “public celebration” is planned for Dec. 1, giving the community walk-on access to the new Illinois-bound span. It will open to traffic in the days following the event, Iowa Department of Transportation officials said early this week.

Wisconsin-based Lunda Construction was the low bidder for the bridge portion of the Interstate 74 expansions in 2017, beating out four other contractors with a low bid of $322 million.

The Iowa DOT has authorized up to $74.5 million in contract modifications for the bridges, officials said, pushing the cost to $396 million.

Three of the other four bids were at least $20 million under current costs.

George Ryan, I-74 Corridor manager, said most of the increases in cost are “related to meeting our goals of opening the Iowa-bound bridge by the end of 2020 and the Illinois-bound bridge by the end of 2021.”

Much of the delay occurred during the spring and summer of 2019, when Lunda and the DOT disagreed over the “constructibility” of the arches as they were designed. For many months, little or no arch work was performed.

In a statement in fall 2019, Lunda acknowledged it “has encountered issues with the design; specifically the geometry of the arch and tolerances utilized in the design.”

Tolerances refer to the allowable variations from the arch specifications, which the DOT argued were proper.

Mark Lowe was director of the Iowa DOT in fall 2019, and he visited Bettendorf during the dispute.

“We feel strongly we had a good plan,” Lowe said of the bridge design. “Our good-faith dispute with them (is that) it's their responsibility. The means, method and sequence (of building it) is up to the contractor.”

While Lunda said the arches were “not constructible,” the DOT continued to stand by the design. Asked in 2019 to define “not constructible,” Lowe said no one was claiming the bridge couldn't be built.

Rather, he said, it was Lunda's position that “it’s not buildable at this price. It's a dispute over compensation.”

Lowe was asked whether the contractor had used delays as “leverage” to get the state to pay more, given the company was aware of the specifications when the job was bid.

“I wouldn't say it that way,” he responded. “I wouldn't term that extortion. At the same time, we must resolve (conflicts), and work must continue.”

He said at the time that Lunda had sought some contract modifications the DOT refused to permit.

This week, Ryan reiterated that the state keeps close tabs on all requests for bid extensions.

“Iowa DOT extensively reviews all contract modification requests and all payments are contingent upon contractor performance and agreed-upon requirements,” he wrote in an email Tuesday.

The DOT’s initial estimate for building the twin spans was $386 million. In 2019, Lowe said he expected any overages to remain within the original estimate, which now is exceeded by about $10 million.

Asked whether disputes over the bridge build are typical or atypical of a large state construction contract, Lowe warned his response could “sound weasely.” He said the project has been both routine and out-of-the-routine, because the project is especially complex.

Asked whether the DOT regrets having chosen Lunda to build the bridge, Lowe replied: “I wouldn't say that. I don't think that would be a fair way for us to look at it. We don't know what could've happened with another contractor.”

 
  • Like
Reactions: BGHAWK
Another example of building a bridge with construction problems because of the design in my opinion.

Not the states, but Davenport spent $8 million bucks several years ago to build a bridge across River Drive so people could walk out on it and I guess look at the vehicles driving below them on River Drive, and then of course so they could see the Mississippi River from above. Maybe they wanted a bridge to nowhere like Alaska built. If it's open today, I expect one or two people will enjoy it. lol
 
In a country that is broke do we really need architectural marvels? How about a nice solid bridge that gets the job done at the best dollar amount? If you want to get all fancy I suggest fundraising.

maybe University of Iowa should have gotten involved and suggest the bridge be round with curved glass accents.
 
In a country that is broke do we really need architectural marvels? How about a nice solid bridge that gets the job done at the best dollar amount? If you want to get all fancy I suggest fundraising.

maybe University of Iowa should have gotten involved and suggest the bridge be round with curved glass accents.
In America…great people build great things that both function and inspire. We are not a country where utility defines our cityscapes, but rather one that strives for the best and always looks for opportunities to show what we are capable of.

This takes extra time and extra money. There will be setbacks and misteps…risks, mistakes, and lessons learned.

But when they say that in the good old days that they made things that were built to last they don’t just means things that last a long time…they mean things that are worth keeping around. Things that people will take time to preserve because of not just what is does but what it means.

So please…continue to build your architectural marvels and plan on keeping them forever. Understand that they will bring addition prosperity and revenue to your community. Don’t build a stage…build an amphitheater…a concert hall. Don’t build a park…build an aboretum. Put steeples and spires on your churches. And make your bridges soar.
 
Another example of building a bridge with construction problems because of the design in my opinion.

Not the states, but Davenport spent $8 million bucks several years ago to build a bridge across River Drive so people could walk out on it and I guess look at the vehicles driving below them on River Drive, and then of course so they could see the Mississippi River from above. Maybe they wanted a bridge to nowhere like Alaska built. If it's open today, I expect one or two people will enjoy it. lol
Alaska never built a bridge to nowhere. The people of Ketchikan have too much money in ferries and did not want it. Palin wanted it, she spent 25million on a highway that goes nowhere because the bridge project got squashed after she secured that money and decided to build the highway just in case she got that bridge she wanted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
In America…great people build great things that both function and inspire. We are not a country where utility defines our cityscapes, but rather one that strives for the best and always looks for opportunities to show what we are capable of.

This takes extra time and extra money. There will be setbacks and misteps…risks, mistakes, and lessons learned.

But when they say that in the good old days that they made things that were built to last they don’t just means things that last a long time…they mean things that are worth keeping around. Things that people will take time to preserve because of not just what is does but what it means.

So please…continue to build your architectural marvels and plan on keeping them forever. Understand that they will bring addition prosperity and revenue to your community. Don’t build a stage…build an amphitheater…a concert hall. Don’t build a park…build an aboretum. Put steeples and spires on your churches. And make your bridges soar.

Connecting the armpit of America to traffic meth doesn’t warrant some kind of inspiring architectural marvel
 
Not the states, but Davenport spent $8 million bucks several years ago to build a bridge across River Drive so people could walk out on it and I guess look at the vehicles driving below them on River Drive, and then of course so they could see the Mississippi River from above.
Wasn’t the main reason for that bridge so that people could safely get to the boat casino? Also to connect to the River Experience thing?

I’ve been on that bridge and it is nice and interesting.

Not saying it was worth $8M (casino boat gone now?) but let’s not spin the main reason for it.
 
“The bridge to nowhere” was to connect Ketchikan to its island-based airport. May or may not have been needed, but not “nowhere”.
 
Wasn’t the main reason for that bridge so that people could safely get to the boat casino? Also to connect to the River Experience thing?

I’ve been on that bridge and it is nice and interesting.

Not saying it was worth $8M (casino boat gone now?) but let’s not spin the main reason for it.
I believe you're right on that, but I don't recall anyone being run over crossing River Drive prior to the bridge. I was being sarcastic, but 8 million was an absolute waste of money then, and now it makes it even worse with the boat gone.
 
Now realize how little of the shit on that 1 trillion dollar infrastructure list is going to get completed.


Dumbfvcks.
We need to fix the infrastructure of this country. It’s the backbone of everything. If you want to live like it is 1000 bc move the Australian outback and have a good time for yourself. If you want to live in modern society, realize we will have to pay for maintenance.
 
We need to fix the infrastructure of this country. It’s the backbone of everything. If you want to live like it is 1000 bc move the Australian outback and have a good time for yourself. If you want to live in modern society, realize we will have to pay for maintenance.
That's fair. I just prefer to get a dollars worth of service out of my dollar spent. We will see how many items get axed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChiDoc
Johnson county rebuilt the Sutliff bridge after the 08 flood so the locals had a place to drink beer. The old box girder bridge had been replaced a generation ago but the locals wanted the old bridge back anyway. Only about a million taxpayer dollars for a drinking deck…
 
The company is notorious for underbidding contracts then holding state hostage for more money. They tried their hardest this time around by blaming the structure but luckily public perception over who was to blame quickly shifted to the GC.

75 mil is actually surprisingly low.. either way, it'll be tied up in court for years to come just like many other projects by this company still are
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChiDoc and torbee
Couple million over? ok. 5 million over? well...ok.
74 million over?!

There had better be room for buffalo on that bridge...
 
  • Like
Reactions: GOHOX69
Wasn’t the main reason for that bridge so that people could safely get to the boat casino? Also to connect to the River Experience thing?

I’ve been on that bridge and it is nice and interesting.

Not saying it was worth $8M (casino boat gone now?) but let’s not spin the main reason for it.
People that call the pedestrian bridge a "bridge to nowhere" are morons.

It safely takes pedestrians from the heart of downtown, over a four-lane state highway and a set of railroad tracks to the region's most important recreation/tourism/economic feature - the Mississippi River.

It also won several architectural and design awards.
 
The company is notorious for underbidding contracts then holding state hostage for more money. They tried their hardest this time around by blaming the structure but luckily public perception over who was to blame quickly shifted to the GC.

75 mil is actually surprisingly low.. either way, it'll be tied up in court for years to come just like many other projects by this company still are
Cheaper than the screw up with the windows on the UI Children's Hospital :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: onlyTheObvious
The Quad Cities gets screwed over all the time by both Iowa and Illinois. Both states havent spent a dime on infrastructure for years. The QC region is comparable in size to Des Moines metro but because of it spans two states never gets to take advantage of those demographics. QC infrastructure is literally built for a city 1/2 its size because neither Illinois or Iowa account for the additional population across the river that still utilize the areas infrastructure. Anyway this bridge kicks ass and once the Bison bridge is built the Quad Cities will be moving bison, people and goods back and forth across the river in style and comfort, while the other river chumps in both Iowa and Illinois have to trundle across the river in their makeshift rafts.

Another QC beauty, The Centennial Bridge


The new Billion Dollar Cadillac of the River


The future Bison Bridge
 
If only people could actually ride the buffalo back and forth across the bridge while pulling wagons of goods, then we'd really be on the cutting edge of the future.
 
If only people could actually ride the buffalo back and forth across the bridge while pulling wagons of goods, then we'd really be on the cutting edge of the future.

Covered wagons.

And every year, we can have a LARPer event of Native Americans that attack and kill the wagon trains, along with a few bison. Event pays for itself with grass-fed bison meat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: torbee
Johnson county rebuilt the Sutliff bridge after the 08 flood so the locals had a place to drink beer. The old box girder bridge had been replaced a generation ago but the locals wanted the old bridge back anyway. Only about a million taxpayer dollars for a drinking deck…

I have had the misfortune of using contractors in Iowa for several million plus contracts.

Like one in particular who changed names to get away from their miserable reputation. This one does a lot of work in E. Iowa.

With Iowa contractors you can count on delays and change orders and poor quality often.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT