ADVERTISEMENT

Record-crushing October keeps Earth on track for hottest year in 2015

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,364
62,379
113

October 2015 global temperature departures from average (NASA)

It was Earth’s warmest October ever recorded and it wasn’t even close. The record-shattering month was right in step with most of the preceding months in 2015 — which is positioned to easily rank as the warmest year on record.

New data from the Japan Meteorological Agency and NASA show that the planet obliterated October records established just last year. October 2015 out-baked October 2014 by 0.34 degrees (0.19 Celsius) and 0.32 degrees (0.18 Celsius) in JMA and NASA’s analyses, respectively.

imrs.php

Time series of the global average October temperature (Japanese Meteorological Agency)
And these records are breaking records.

The planet’s temperature departure from the long-term average of 1.04 Celsius in October is the greatest of any month ever recorded by NASA. It marked the first time a monthly temperature anomaly exceeded 1 degrees Celsius in records dating back to 1880. The previous largest anomaly was 0.97 Celsius from January, 2007.

woah.png

Monthly global temperature departure from average in degrees Celsius (divide by 100 for specific departure).
The toasty October put another exclamation mark on a year that has essentially locked up the title of warmest on record.

In August, the Earth’s average temperature was running so far ahead of 2014, the previous warmest year, that NOAA said there was 97 percent chance 2015 would surpass it.

Then, the planet recorded its warmest September ever recorded by an unprecedented margin.

[After record-shattering September, 2015 in commanding lead for Earth’s hottest year on record]

Earlier this month, Britain’s weather service, the Met Office, and NASA both stated that the Earth’s average temperature is likely to rise 1 degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels for the first time by the end of this year. This milestone is significant since it marks the halfway point to two degrees Celsius, the internationally accepted limit for avoiding the worst consequences of climate change.

[The world is off course to prevent two degrees C of warming, says energy agency]


Temperatures have trended upward over the last several decades, spurred by increasing and unrelenting emissions of heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide. Meanwhile, since the spring, a strengthening El Niño event, which is now near record levels, has bumped this year’s temperatures to all-time highs.

[By one measure, this wicked El Niño is the strongest ever recorded: What it means]

El Niño events release vast amounts of heat from the tropical Pacific into the atmosphere. This year’s event is near its peak and may begin to weaken soon, but is expected to remain strong into the winter, likely keeping global average temperatures above or at least very near previous record levels.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...top-stories_cwg-october-1210pm:homepage/story
 
Probably the most disturbing aspect to this, is that although we are in an El Nino winter/year, we are 'pre-El Nino' as far as average annual temperatures vs. the 1998 El Nino year.

An apples-apples comparison would be 1997 to 2015 at this point (you can see the Oct 1997 spike in the graph posted, because that was when the last big El Nino was in full force). But, 1997 was an overall relatively 'normal' year along the plot for annual average temperatures. It was 1998 that had the huge jump in annual temperatures, after the El Nino.

Following the pattern of previous events, we should see a similar El Nino spike in global temperatures for 2016, and yet we're already blowing the annual average temperature (year to date) record away in 2015.

Of course, this is just more 'federally funded scientists making up the data'; we should have Congress investigate the Japanese Meteorological Agency, and cut their funding....o_O
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
On OP map, why variance from 1951-1980? Why not before 1951 and after 1980? I understand some believe global warming started after 1980 so they want to remove those outliers, but why not before 1951? They can go back to late 1800's.
 
On OP map, why variance from 1951-1980? Why not before 1951 and after 1980? I understand some believe global warming started after 1980 so they want to remove those outliers, but why not before 1951? They can go back to late 1800's.

You have to use SOME segment of the record as a 'reference' period; you are seeing deviation from the reference period, not absolute temperatures.

During the 50s thru the 70s, we had a predominance of ENSO Neutral or La Nina periods; temperatures during those decades were fairly flat, due to this and a number of other factors.

The reference period you choose really isn't all that important. If we did choose 'back to the 1880s', the graph above is going to look mostly the same, but the scaling factors for the colors would be different (about 0.2 or 0.3 greater). It's not going to change the overall pattern.

Here is what GISTEMP records show over the whole period:
(using a stacked decadal smoothing filter)

mean:51


Here is the HADCRUT4 data:

mean:51


And FWIW....'warming DID NOT START' in 1980. There is evidence that human influences have been at work for the past several thousand years. However, we have seen significant upticks in the past century or so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT