ADVERTISEMENT

Report: Top Steele Dossier Source Is Suspected Russian Spy

Whew!!!

Good thing the Senate Intel Committee Reports relied on LOADS of other evidence outside of Steele's work, then!!!!
:cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Does it really surprise anyone that a source for information coming out of Russia may have Russian ties? Of course these sources would. The source should have been well vetted. This smells of Barr releasing half truths to try and make Trump look good.
 
giphy.gif
 
Actually the Steele Dossier started as oppo research by Republicans...

Close. It was started by a private citizen that is a republican and hated trump.

After firing off a quick e-mail to a big conservative donor they knew who disliked Trump, they were hired. They don’t identify that donor but note, helpfully, that he arranged for them to contract their opposition-research assignment through the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative Web site known to be funded by Paul Singer, a New York hedge-fund magnate. Once Trump secured the nomination, however, the G.O.P. donor fled.

At that point, Fusion switched clients and political parties, pitching its services to Marc Elias, the lawyer for the D.N.C. and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign
 
  • Like
Reactions: haw-key
Hillary Clinton and the DNC: ZERO INDICTMENTS
Clinton Foundation: ZERO INDICTMENTS

That must hurt, bro....

Not at all. It is an indicator of the corruption within the system.

There are plenty on the right that should also be indicted for things other than process crimes.
 
And THAT is the truth.

Not really. It was started by one guy with a lot of money that is a republican and hated trump. When he left the DNC and Hillary picked up the bill going forward. They paid for it once trump received the nomination
 
The dossier was never expected to be 100% accurate anyway -- have you read about the work guys like Steele do? I believe a 70% accuracy rate is considered good stuff.

They're in the business of drumming up leads and possibilities -- not conclusively proving anything. Steele was well respected in his community at doing this and had a good track-record of delivery leads that went somewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: damayason
Not really. It was started by one guy with a lot of money that is a republican and hated trump. When he left the DNC and Hillary picked up the bill going forward. They paid for it once trump received the nomination

So, what you are trying hard to both deny and promote is that it was birthed by Republicans, but they wern't really Republicans?
 
So, what you are trying hard to both deny and promote is that it was birthed by Republicans, but they wern't really Republicans?

1) easy to forget how many Republicans were doing their utmost to derail Trump in early 2016
2) amazing how many RINOs there are/were in the Republican Party - I wonder if that should tell us something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
1) easy to forget how many Republicans were doing their utmost to derail Trump in early 2016
2) amazing how many RINOs there are/were in the Republican Party - I wonder if that should tell us something?
Rhino is a blue dog Democrat. They are becoming extinct as both parties no longer work in the middle
 
The dossier was never expected to be 100% accurate anyway -- have you read about the work guys like Steele do? I believe a 70% accuracy rate is considered good stuff.

They're in the business of drumming up leads and possibilities -- not conclusively proving anything. Steele was well respected in his community at doing this and had a good track-record of delivery leads that went somewhere.
Delete your account.
 
Good thing we spent so much time and money to overthrow an elected president
Um, no.

That's not at all what the Senate Intel Committee's goal was.

It was to shed light and provide public disclosure on Russian interference in our elections. And it does that. In Spades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Um, no.

That's not at all what the Senate Intel Committee's goal was.

It was to shed light and provide public disclosure on Russian interference in our elections. And it does that. In Spades.
You always forget this part...

Volume 5 exhaustively reviews the counterintelligence threats and vulnerabilities to the 2016 election, but never explicitly states the critical fact: the Committee found no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government in its efforts to meddle in the election.

Always.
 
You always forget this part...

Volume 5 exhaustively reviews the counterintelligence threats and vulnerabilities to the 2016 election, but never explicitly states the critical fact: the Committee found no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government in its efforts to meddle in the election.

You always point out the nonsense placed in the Appendix by Trump sycophants, which is completely at odds with the rest of the document.
 
Good thing we spent so much time and money to overthrow an elected president because you libs didn’t like the outcome. Talk about not accepting results.
Kind of like McConnell saying they wouldn't work with Obama in order to make him a one term president. You like to paint Trump as this poor bully victim. It isn't about the election results. It's about this idiot president being a traitor to the country right in front of us. You just don't care. You're no patriot, that much I know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
Um, no.

That's not at all what the Senate Intel Committee's goal was.

It was to shed light and provide public disclosure on Russian interference in our elections. And it does that. In Spades.
Went from Russia interfering to liberals, but hey “what matter does it make”
 
Close. It was started by a private citizen that is a republican and hated trump.

After firing off a quick e-mail to a big conservative donor they knew who disliked Trump, they were hired. They don’t identify that donor but note, helpfully, that he arranged for them to contract their opposition-research assignment through the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative Web site known to be funded by Paul Singer, a New York hedge-fund magnate. Once Trump secured the nomination, however, the G.O.P. donor fled.

At that point, Fusion switched clients and political parties, pitching its services to Marc Elias, the lawyer for the D.N.C. and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign
Now that was a beat down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkedoff
Kind of like McConnell saying they wouldn't work with Obama in order to make him a one term president. You like to paint Trump as this poor bully victim. It isn't about the election results. It's about this idiot president being a traitor to the country right in front of us. You just don't care. You're no patriot, that much I know.
Obama will go down as the biggest traitor in US history. He orchestrated a coup against an incoming President in order to solidify a Marxist/socialism government
 
Obama will go down as the biggest traitor in US history. He orchestrated a coup against an incoming President in order to solidify a Marxist/socialism government
Lol...fake news. Like actual fake news. It's Trump...they guy in bed with our enemy. Our dictator wannabe. It's right in front of your face.
 
Obama will go down as the biggest traitor in US history. He orchestrated a coup against an incoming President in order to solidify a Marxist/socialism government

I don’t think you understand the difference between a “coup” and an investigation.

And neither does Dear Leader.

Exactly how many indictments have stemmed from this “coup” again?

 
ADVERTISEMENT