Imagine that, you're wrong again. LOL
Asif I'm the only one to observe what a monumental dumb **** you are. GTFO.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Imagine that, you're wrong again. LOL
Asif I'm the only one to observe what a monumental dumb **** you are. GTFO.
No. It’s not about tax cheats. It’s about weaponizing the IRS to go after people they don’t like. And make no mistake, it already happens, they just want the resources to do it a whole lot more.The Radical Right wants to make this an issue because they tie this into the talking point that the Dems will raise taxes. Even though Joe Manchin specifically explained on Fox Opinion Network that Mericans earning <$400k will not pay more.
It's another example of fear mongering that the cons are so prolific at.
If you don't cheat on your taxes, you have nothing to worry about.
This is crazy.No. It’s not about tax cheats. It’s about weaponizing the IRS to go after people they don’t like. And make no mistake, it already happens, they just want the resources to do it a whole lot more.
Imagine that, you're wrong again. LOL
Asif I'm the only one to observe what a monumental dumb **** you are. GTFO.
No. It’s not about tax cheats. It’s about weaponizing the IRS to go after people they don’t like. And make no mistake, it already happens, they just want the resources to do it a whole lot more.
You need funding PERIOD. If Congress doesn't provide enough $$ to fund those positions they go unfilled - as they have for years.That’s not true…they’re funding positions. You don’t need special funding additions to hire replacements. You need new funding for additional positions
The funds still need to be provided in the budget, which hasn't been happening. They could decide to fill these positions in October but would have to RIF sometime in the following year when they run out of money.That’s not true…they’re funding positions. You don’t need special funding additions to hire replacements. You need new funding for additional positions
I never thought of you as an elf, but I suppose. It might explain a few things.
Bullllllshit!!!! It's about collecting the tax dollars that are owed and not paid.No. It’s not about tax cheats. It’s about weaponizing the IRS to go after people they don’t like. And make no mistake, it already happens, they just want the resources to do it a whole lot more.
Another demonstration of being a dumb **** - trying desperately to be clever and failing.
So you're playing the "victimhood" card again?No. It’s not about tax cheats. It’s about weaponizing the IRS to go after people they don’t like. And make no mistake, it already happens, they just want the resources to do it a whole lot more.
Another demonstration of being a dumb **** - trying desperately to be clever and failing.
You are a piece of work. LOL.
JFCYou need funding PERIOD. If Congress doesn't provide enough $$ to fund those positions they go unfilled - as they have for years.
The fallacy that you and others on the right are promoting is that there are 87,000 IRS agents to be hired in addition to what's there already. That's false. Not to mention the roles that they will be playing are widely varied.
Just another example of a very good measure being misrepresented by republicans.
They need to increase salaries to become more attractive. They are way behind the private sector. Look at a few of the articles I linked.JFC
Can you read? My response was specific to replacing retirees.
Those positions are already funded and they didn’t need additional funding to replace them.
Not if it’s a funded position.The funds still need to be provided in the budget, which hasn't been happening. They could decide to fill these positions in October but would have to RIF sometime in the following year when they run out of money.
They are not. They don't know who is going to retire in 2029. The funding is for a wide variety of uses over many years. It can be moved from one area to another depending on needs. It will fund additional agents and workers to collect the taxes owed and make the IRS more efficient. The additional revenue generated will pay for the additional expenditure - it's a net positive.JFC
Can you read? My response was specific to replacing retirees.
Those positions are already funded and they didn’t need additional funding to replace them.
How long was the IRS completely funded before this bill passed?Not if it’s a funded position.
In addition…a replacement for a retiree would be almost always at lower pay grade and step.
They should have left replacing retirees off their reason list because it’s bs….they already had the funding.
So dumb. Don’t you ever get tired of the government getting bigger and bigger, taking more and more money, and screwing everything up? Financially, what does the government do well? What program would run well if it just had more funding (and more and more and more).Looks like the right wingers are getting a little nervous about cheating on their taxes, what with all of these new hires to assist in auditing tax returns. I guess I don't see the problem, unless of course they're used to cheating. I wonder where they learned how to do that. They ought to be thanking the donald tax cheater trump.
Do you believe you should pay more taxes because you aren't a big corporation?So dumb. Don’t you ever get tired of the government getting bigger and bigger, taking more and more money, and screwing everything up? Financially, what does the government do well? What program would run well if it just had more funding (and more and more and more).
I realize how federal pay works. Did it for 6 years.They need to increase salaries to become more attractive. They are way behind the private sector. Look at a few of the articles I linked.
Medicare and Medicaid, for starters.So dumb. Don’t you ever get tired of the government getting bigger and bigger, taking more and more money, and screwing everything up? Financially, what does the government do well? What program would run well if it just had more funding (and more and more and more).
All federal work is behind the private sector.They need to increase salaries to become more attractive. They are way behind the private sector. Look at a few of the articles I linked.
Part of the increase in funding to make the IRS a more attractive job. I wasn't trying to be a jerk just explaining some of the reasoning. Look at the 2008 article I linked. It looks like shitz but it is a non-partisan organization. These problems have been known for quite a while.I realize how federal pay works. Did it for 6 years.
30 for meI realize how federal pay works. Did it for 6 years.
Should have said civil service because I did 26 years active duty as well…but military pay isn’t really done the same30 for me
In the last 5 years I have seen employees starting at grade 14 in positions that would normally be 5/7/9/11 and then you'd need to compete just to get a 12.All federal work is behind the private sector.
They’ll probably redesignate positions at higher pay grades
Looks like a perfect job for Killer Kyle Rittenhouse.Armed IRS agents roaming the streets with assault rifles making people pay new taxes. Terrifying!
Idiot.We need more federal government. They know what’s best and always have our best interests at heart. They are highly efficient, too.
That’s nuts…where do you work?In the last 5 years I have seen employees starting at grade 14 in positions that would normally be 5/7/9/11 and then you'd need to compete just to get a 12.
No. It’s about having the ability to go after really wealthy people who are really good at hiding assets from the American government. I have heard about this for years. The IRS doesn’t have the ability to go after people who are really good at avoiding taxes. That’s not everyday Americans. Again Ted Cruz agrees with you. That means you’re wrong.No. It’s not about tax cheats. It’s about weaponizing the IRS to go after people they don’t like. And make no mistake, it already happens, they just want the resources to do it a whole lot more.
Nice try RussiaThat’s nuts…where do you work?
Not yet. I could retire now but my wife spends too much money.That's a long time. Retired?
They don't. It is special agents that are investigating criminal tax violations and other financial crimes. They are the only IRS agents that have guns.So why do techies need to be willing to carry guns and use them?