RFK Jr reports 20% of Moderna Vaccine recipents suffer "grave injuries"
- Thread starter royhobbs2
- Start date
And, once again, the studies to date have included vaccines "up to six months" AND vaccines AFTER 6 months.
If you are parsing out studies that have halted normal vaccination schedules to a very specific argument, then there won't be any.
They were given 20 studies, and THEY claim those studies don't meet their criteria.
When, in fact, they actually do.
Abstract "There is a compelling argument that the occurrence of regressive autism is attributable to genetic and chromosomal abnormalities, arising from the overuse of vaccines, which subsequently affects the stability and function of the autonomic nervous system and physiological systems. That sense perception is linked to the autonomic nervous system and the function of the physiological systems enables us to examine the significance of autistic symptoms from a systemic perspective. Failure of the excretory system influences elimination of heavy metals and facilitates their accumulation and subsequent manifestation as neurotoxins: the long-term consequences of which would lead to neurodegeneration, cognitive and developmental problems. It may also influence regulation of neural hyperthermia. This article explores the issues and concludes that sensory dysfunction and systemic failure, manifested as autism, is the inevitable consequence arising from subtle DNA alteration and consequently from the overuse of vaccines"
But that's old news, eh Joe: the VacciNazis in Geneva admitted as much last Fall ("Science? What Science??"). Would love to here more about how the porn actress/scientist at Surgisphere nearly singlehandedly debunked the safety and efficacy of HCQ and got the study halted.. She must have some impressive, uhhhh, assets?
But that's old news, eh Joe: the VacciNazis in Geneva admitted as much last Fall ("Science? What Science??"). Would love to here more about how the porn actress/scientist at Surgisphere nearly singlehandedly debunked the safety and efficacy of HCQ and got the study halted.. She must have some impressive, uhhhh, assets?
Abstract "There is a compelling argument that the occurrence of regressive autism is attributable to genetic and chromosomal abnormalities, arising from the overuse of vaccines, which subsequently affects the stability and function of the autonomic nervous system and physiological systems. That sense perception is linked to the autonomic nervous system and the function of the physiological systems enables us to examine the significance of autistic symptoms from a systemic perspective. Failure of the excretory system influences elimination of heavy metals and facilitates their accumulation and subsequent manifestation as neurotoxins: the long-term consequences of which would lead to neurodegeneration, cognitive and developmental problems. It may also influence regulation of neural hyperthermia. This article explores the issues and concludes that sensory dysfunction and systemic failure, manifested as autism, is the inevitable consequence arising from subtle DNA alteration and consequently from the overuse of vaccines"
But that's old news, eh Joe: the VacciNazis in Geneva admitted as much last Fall ("Science? What Science??"). Would love to here more about how the porn actress/scientist at Surgisphere nearly singlehandedly debunked the safety and efficacy of HCQ and got the study halted.. She must have some impressive, uhhhh, assets?
You should probably be aware the author of your "illustrious paper" is neither a physician, nor a scientist.
Graham and Elena Ewing (Dr) are Directors of Montague Healthcare a company devoted to the commercialisation of Virtual Scanning and hence to the diagnostic and therapeutic use of Virtual Scanning.
The author of this "article", Graham Ewing, is not a doctor. He is not a scientist. He is not a psychologist. He is a businessman and CEO of a company called Montague Healthcare, he and his wife run a website called PositiveHealthOnline, and he promotes his "Virtual Scanning" which uses a oh god damn f*** it all, I can't do it this one anymore. Just go to his website and experience the bullshit for yourself. Anyway, he bullshittily claims that autism is due to "subtle DNA alteration" from the "overuse of vaccines", no evidence required or supplied.
http://www.docbastard.net/2016/05/124-papers-that-do-not-prove-vaccines.html
http://www.positivehealth.com/author/dr-elena-ewing-and-graham-ewing/dr-elena-ewing-and-graham-ewing
Oh, so Elena’s NOT a porn actress? Obviously her medical credentials are non-existent in JP’s world
How do they explain autism in non vaccinated people? Or the similar conditions found in people before vaccinations became available?Abstract "There is a compelling argument that the occurrence of regressive autism is attributable to genetic and chromosomal abnormalities, arising from the overuse of vaccines, which subsequently affects the stability and function of the autonomic nervous system and physiological systems. That sense perception is linked to the autonomic nervous system and the function of the physiological systems enables us to examine the significance of autistic symptoms from a systemic perspective. Failure of the excretory system influences elimination of heavy metals and facilitates their accumulation and subsequent manifestation as neurotoxins: the long-term consequences of which would lead to neurodegeneration, cognitive and developmental problems. It may also influence regulation of neural hyperthermia. This article explores the issues and concludes that sensory dysfunction and systemic failure, manifested as autism, is the inevitable consequence arising from subtle DNA alteration and consequently from the overuse of vaccines"
But that's old news, eh Joe: the VacciNazis in Geneva admitted as much last Fall ("Science? What Science??"). Would love to here more about how the porn actress/scientist at Surgisphere nearly singlehandedly debunked the safety and efficacy of HCQ and got the study halted.. She must have some impressive, uhhhh, assets?
Lots of guessing, speculation and pseudo science to advance a narrative. I wonder why?
First of all, how often does that happen? How about go get a number and come back to me.
2nd, who claimed that vaccines were the ONLY thing that causes autism? I don't recall ONE post that claimed that in the hundreds of debate threads on HROT over the years. Why don't you try to go find one while you're at the first request.
Oh, and if, by chance you can't find a number, how about go to Youtube and find some stories that claim their non-vaccinated kid developed autism? Good luck sorting through all the crap ton of vids that claim their autistic kid was vaccinated.
Oh this is truly great. And how exactly did those studies in the CDC response meet the lawsuit criteria?
Yes. Youtube, along with all your other links, are such bastions of fact-checked sources, aren't they?
Your buddy just linked a PDF that has random op-eds which have ZERO medical or factual relevance. Written by a company CEO with ZERO science or medical training.
And you guys lap that shit up.
I, and others, explain it to you time after time after time.
You're taking the word of a news article "claiming" they did not address the question. Rather than go study it yourself, just like your buddy cited a nonsense article as science (when it's all faked propaganda), you just regurgitate what you're told.
Go pull up all 20 references, and post links on them, and maybe people on these boards can explain them to you. Obviously, you'll NEVER figure them out for yourself.
And you can't understand the like 4 critiques of that study, all 4 of which had their own fatal flaws to lay out. That study is a nothing but a soft heap of luke-warm donkey turds.
Why do the 6 "experts" puss out when it comes time to talk to him in front of a load of people with cameras rolling then? 6:1 ratio. As I said before, RFK knows his crap and his balls are bigger than your house.
Actually, I asked him to come back with a number for me. Then half jokingly I brought up Youtube. Though isn't it odd that the numbers seem oddly skewed one way? Just an observation.
YouTube is filled with tons of garbage, does not surprise me (flat earth, conspiracy theories, etc). How many of these parents are board certified/degreed/work in associated field? Bring me a number.
You say you jokingly brought up YouTube, now you are digging in deeper with the comment. Odd.
Last edited:
Lol - you and others have claimed that vaccines cause autism without evidence. Now you can't explain how children get autism when vaccines are not administered. Your argument has more holes than a Chicago street. Lol
Because you can't have a reasonable debate with a person who lacks reason. As we see throughout this thread.
Dude I've posted like 4 different critiques of it, all of which you've completely ignored. Two of them are in this very thread.
Have you answered those 3 questions yet there stud? Put your money where your mouth is.
Have you?
List the key points from one. Is it a published rebuttal, or another rando Youtube vid?
It's in line with what you guy keep posting here and expect "science" debate.
Oh there's evidence, believe me. I don't think you know the meaning of the word. If you weren't such a rookie here you'd know it too.
Psssst.....Joe knows it. He's lying.
LMAO - the "believe me" rationale. You get funnier with each post.
Flat Earth on.
Both these were linked earlier in this thread. The CHD points have been brought up in at least three threads now. The Hooker critique is new to the debate since probably 1/2 way through this thread.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...-rate-of-1-in-100-cdc-should-rush-to-denmark/
https://www.focusforhealth.org/scientists-rebuttal-to-danish-cohort-study/
Similar threads
