ADVERTISEMENT

River in India sacred to Hindus blanketed in toxic white foam

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,910
61,405
113
The 855-mile Yamuna is one of India’s most sacred rivers. That’s why during the Hindu festival of Chhath Puja, many people dip, wade or immerse themselves in its waters.
But during this year’s celebrations, a stretch of the river is blanketed in a layer of cloudy white. It’s not snow — temperatures rise into the 80s in the day — but a toxic foam caused by industrial waste and untreated sewage, officials say.
Still, devotees took a holy dip, standing knee-deep in the river to pray and make offerings to the setting sun in honor of the sun god, to whom the four-day festival is dedicated. With an emphasis on purity, the festival involves a fast — no food or water — on the day devotees gather around bodies of water to pray and make their offerings.
Despite understanding the health risks, Rajesh Kumar Verma stood in the water Wednesday. “What fear? If we are scared, then how can we pray?” he told the Associated Press.

To keep the froth at bay, the Delhi government tried several tactics this year. It put up bamboo nets to act as a foam barrier, the Indian Express reported. It sent people out in 15 boats to “beat the foam with sticks.” It had the water sprayed with a hose to dissipate foam particles. The attempts became fodder for local jokes: “When you have to water a river,” one tweeted.



Delhi consistently ranks among the most polluted cities in the world, with “hazardous” air pollution levels 39 times what the World Health Organization sets out in its air-quality guidelines, according to Swiss air-quality technology company IQAir.
In India, bodies of water have actually burned because of heavy pollution. Bangalore’s largest lake, Bellandur Lake, has consistently erupted in flames. It froths up, too.
India is the world’s third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases. At COP26, the United Nations climate summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said Monday that India would aim to reach net-zero emissions by 2070.
The goal is two decades off what advocates had hoped for — and Indian officials are saying that for the country to accelerate its transition to clean energy, it would need financial and technological help from wealthy nations that spouted heavy pollution to ascend the development ladder.
“Delhi is full of pollution but still people’s lives are going on. Like that, we will also do our prayers,” Rajendra Mahto, also

 
People in North India will North India. All that junk stems from the Chief Minister in that area, Arvind Kejriwal. This is not to say other parts of India are polluted but where my peeps are from, we have pristine beaches. They can have all the white foam they want :)

india-goa-best-beaches-colva-beach.jpg
 
People in North India will North India. All that junk stems from the Chief Minister in that area, Arvind Kejriwal. This is not to say other parts of India are polluted but where my peeps are from, we have pristine beaches. They can have all the white foam they want :)

india-goa-best-beaches-colva-beach.jpg
I don't get the North India comment. I know it's a big country with a lot of diversity, but, what's wrong with North Indians?
This is a lot of pollution to accept by the Indian people. And, before you say, "Iowa's hog nutrient laden water", it ain't that bad here in Iowa. Why do the people take it? This is 1970s era rivers burning in America stuff. From what I have read the vast majority of the pollution comes from a few sources in these areas. Massive source pollution seems to be okay in India.
 
I don't get the North India comment. I know it's a big country with a lot of diversity, but, what's wrong with North Indians?
This is a lot of pollution to accept by the Indian people. And, before you say, "Iowa's hog nutrient laden water", it ain't that bad here in Iowa. Why do the people take it? This is 1970s era rivers burning in America stuff. From what I have read the vast majority of the pollution comes from a few sources in these areas. Massive source pollution seems to be okay in India.
You should read a little more about India than the Economist. The North India comment has to do with inept governance. You can Google Arvind Kejriwal and that will clue you in. It has nothing to do with the citizens, it's the ineptitude of the state government there.
And before you're butt hurt, I didn't bring up Iowa or any other American state. You have.

See this article. The central or federal government gave them money. They did nothing.

 
You should read a little more about India than the Economist. The North India comment has to do with inept governance. You can Google Arvind Kejriwal and that will clue you in. It has nothing to do with the citizens, it's the ineptitude of the state government there.
And before you're butt hurt, I didn't bring up Iowa or any other American state. You have.

See this article. The central or federal government gave them money. They did nothing.

You made the comment, it seems fair to ask you to explain it's context or meaning. I just don't understand why the people seem so willing to live in toxic filth.
 
You should read a little more about India than the Economist. The North India comment has to do with inept governance. You can Google Arvind Kejriwal and that will clue you in. It has nothing to do with the citizens, it's the ineptitude of the state government there.
And before you're butt hurt, I didn't bring up Iowa or any other American state. You have.

You made the comment, it seems fair to ask you to explain it's context or meaning. I just don't understand why the people seem so willing to live in toxic filth.
It's a developing nation, in many parts. People don't really have a choice. Even here we have issues. Oh well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
It's a developing nation, in many parts. People don't really have a choice. Even here we have issues. Oh well.
I fully admit I do not follow Indian politics above knowing who the PM is. What is participation like in elections? The Covid response wasn't very good, either. It seems like the death toll numbers were aggressively depressed. Does that move the needle among the voters?
 
I fully admit I do not follow Indian politics above knowing who the PM is. What is participation like in elections? The Covid response wasn't very good, either. It seems like the death toll numbers were aggressively depressed. Does that move the needle among the voters?
The voting rate in Indian elections for prime Minister is always very high. The problem with Indian politics, much like the US, is that there's a bifurcation between the federal and state government. There the state or chief minister of a state is equivalent of a governor here. States that have good chief ministers and who work well with the federal government, known in India as the central government or centre, do much better and flourish. States with whacky chief ministers like Kejriwal are train wrecks. Much like Kim Reynolds. It's always mostly about corruption and embezzlement. Covid or not, competent response was mostly a state government issue. For example, the death rate in Mumbai was negligible compared to Delhi. Mumbai in Maharashtra has mostly competent leadership. The State government in the Delhi area, where this foam issue is, is run by crackpots. Same for air pollution.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT