ADVERTISEMENT

Russia and 3 OPEC Members Agree to Freeze Oil Output

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,602
60,821
113
In a sign of tentative cooperation among major oil producers, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela announced a plan on Tuesday to freeze output at current levels, a move intended to help bolster energy prices.

The plan, albeit hardly concrete, reflects the troubled state of the oil industry.

With prices having recently slipped to new lows, major oil producers, particularly in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, are trying to calm the markets with talk of a deal. But the proposal gives countries a potential out, a big reason oil prices gave up their initial gains on Tuesday.

While speculation focused for months on production cuts, the talk now centers on holding production steady. Even that would be helpful in a market where countries have been steadily ramping up production to record levels.


The plan represents a reversal for Saudi Arabia. As oil prices have slumped, the country, the de facto leader of OPEC, has avoided trying to manage the market through cuts, or even talking of them. Instead, it has continued to ramp up production, even as prices dropped sharply.

It is also symbolic that Saudi Arabia and Russia are now presenting a united front on oil. The two countries are geopolitical rivals, backing opposite sides in the Syrian civil war.

While major oil-producing countries have been floating ideas to the markets for months, the rhetoric is heating up, as oil prices flirt with $30 a barrel.

Venezuela has been especially vocal about managing production. The country’s economy, which is critically linked to the prices of oil, is in disarray, and its leadership has little financial backup.

Now, it appears to be getting support from Saudi Arabia and Russia. While such big players are feeling the pain, they are in better shape, making it easier to weather the price weakness.

“It is a positive step in the right direction in a transition period,” said a Persian Gulf oil official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the delicate nature of the talks. “The main driver is prices going below $30 a barrel, which was very disturbing.”

He added that it was important that four major oil powers, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Venezuela and Qatar, were involved in the discussions. There is a “clear road map” of what countries to approach next, he said, an effort that could lead to a more formal agreement on production.

But the producers are not committing to a deal, highlighting the difficulty of the process. The four countries said they would freeze their output at January levels only if other major exporters did the same — and that is hardly an easy sell.

Iran has staked out a policy of increasing oil exports now that sanctions have been lifted as part of its nuclear deal, and Iraq has a longstanding policy of seeking to ramp up production regardless of OPEC price-stabilizing policies. And Russia, which is not a member of OPEC, has historically resisted any binding coordination with the OPEC cartel to bolster global oil prices.

“The four countries — Russia, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Venezuela — are ready to freeze oil production at January levels if other producers join this initiative,” the Russian Ministry of Energy said in a statement issued after the talks.

The markets were lukewarm on the plan. Oil prices initially surged above $35.50 a barrel on discussion of a deal. But details prompted a pullback in prices, which dipped below $34.

“The market does not need a freeze. It needs a reduction,” said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy and Economic Research in Massachusetts. “They are not offering anything like that.”

He added that the plan announced on Tuesday was in the early stages. “People are talking and admitting to concerns about price levels,” he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/b...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
 
United States uses a lot of oil and I think the cheaper it is the better off the economy is.

It's a trade off. It leaves more money in the pockets of consumers to be spent on other products, which helps the economy, but it hurts those in the oil industry and all of the related economic sectors that rely on the oil industry. You're right that it's probably a net plus though.
 
It's a trade off. It leaves more money in the pockets of consumers to be spent on other products, which helps the economy, but it hurts those in the oil industry and all of the related economic sectors that rely on the oil industry. You're right that it's probably a net plus though.

Helps the middle class and hurts the billionaires.
 
Helps the middle class and hurts the billionaires.
Bernie Sanders Acolyte? Teachers pensions ( IPERS ) are loaded with energy sector equities and most anyone who has a 401K. ( That would be anyone who is smart enough to not want to rely on Social Security in their old age. )

The fact is now would be a great time to get all the proposed pipelines built while oil is cheap. When the Cartels push the price back up the US and Canadian sources can be ready. There are already so many pipeline in existence that idea that a couple more would be a disaster is utter nonsense. We have 3 natural gas line already on the farm where I work. The pipeline is just the usual straw-man rallying point for the loony left.
 
It's a trade off. It leaves more money in the pockets of consumers to be spent on other products, which helps the economy, but it hurts those in the oil industry and all of the related economic sectors that rely on the oil industry. You're right that it's probably a net plus though.

And it hurts the market. When the market tanks, the large companies lose money. When they lose money, they have less reserves. When that happens, they cut expenses which leads to layoffs. So no, it's not a net plus.

We are just starting to feel the implications to the market's reaction to falling oil prices.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT