S.C. Republicans lash out at male colleagues over strict abortion bill

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
72,358
52,069
113
South Carolina state Sen. Katrina Shealy (R) proposed antiabortion legislation in four of the five legislative sessions that have taken place since she was first elected a decade ago. But on Wednesday, she lashed out at her Republican colleagues for trying to pass an abortion bill that would eliminate exceptions for rape and incest victims.


“Yes, I’m pro-life,” Shealy said. “I’m also pro-life for the mother, the life she has with her children who are already born. I care about the children who are forced into adulthood that was made up by a legislature full of men so they can take a victory lap and feel good about it.”
“It disgusts me,” she added.

South Carolina senators are considering a near-total ban on abortion starting at fertilization. It would be an even more severe restriction than the one they passed last year that went into effect in late June, which prohibits abortion at about six weeks when doctors can detect a fetal heartbeat. The state Supreme Court voted last month to temporarily block the ban.
South Carolina House passes abortion ban with rape and incest exception
Shealy is one of three Republican women in the Senate. All of them said that, without exceptions for rape and incest, they won’t support their colleagues’ bill.





The Senate adjourned Wednesday night without a vote but is scheduled to reconvene Thursday morning. If the bill clears the Senate, it will go back to the House, which last week approved a version that included exceptions for rape and incest until the 12th week of pregnancy.

Shealy is not the only South Carolina Republican typically supportive of antiabortion measures to express doubts about the strict abortion proposals. On Aug. 16, state Rep. Neal Collins said he regretted voting last year to ban abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected.
About two weeks after the six-week ban took effect, Collins said, a doctor called to tell him about a 19-year-old woman who’d recently arrived at the emergency room 15 weeks pregnant. Her water broke, the fetus was nonviable and the standard of care called for an abortion.










But, since there was a heartbeat, the hospital’s lawyers told the doctors they couldn’t approve one. They discharged the woman instead, leaving her with a greater than 50 percent chance of losing her uterus and a 10 percent chance of developing a life-threatening infection.

“That weighs on me,” Collins said. “I voted for that bill. These are affecting people.”
South Carolina Supreme Court temporarily blocks 6-week abortion ban
Shealy also voted to ban abortions after six weeks. In fact, she co-sponsored the bill, telling her colleagues during a floor debate last year that the legislation “protects the life of the unborn with a heartbeat.”
On Wednesday — about a year-and-a-half later — she found herself denouncing the new antiabortion legislation and scolding her male colleagues for trying to pass it. In doing so, she told them that women are smart enough to run households and businesses, to take care of children and aging parents.


“The only thing that we are not smart enough to do is take care of our own bodies. We need men in government, not medical professionals, to do that,” she said sarcastically, adding, “The South Carolina legislature — we know best.”

State Sen. Penry Gustafson echoed Shealy from the floor a few minutes later. The Republican said she was against abortion and wished that no one had sex before marriage and that pregnancies were always wanted. But, Gustafson added, she lives in “Realville,” where she acknowledges that’s not reality. She also challenged fellow Republicans to consider mothers’ rights.
Gustafson maligned the bill as “wishful-thinking legislation.”
“This bill does not recognize or even acknowledge another right besides the right of the baby,” Gustafson said. “So, do we women have no autonomy over our own bodies? Are we simply baby machines?”










Then she asked other senators to weigh possible health emergencies. What if a woman is carrying a dead fetus? What if someone has an ectopic pregnancy that could threaten their life? What if an 11-year-old girl gets raped and impregnated?

“Well, that’s just too bad, according to this bill,” Gustafson said.
Sandy Senn, the third Republican woman in the Senate and the only one who voted against the six-week ban passed last year, mocked her male colleagues for calling a special session to address the ban and presuming that “women and families need your guidance because y’all know better than them.”
“You cannot legislate morality, you cannot tell people who to sleep with, you cannot tell people who to marry and you cannot tell women what to do with their own bodies, try as you might.”
Senn warned them that passing the ban could come with consequences in November’s election. “This issue is huge,” she said, adding, “You don’t think that women will vote single-issue on something like this?”
“Because they will.”

 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80

FlickShagwell

HR Legend
Gold Member
Jun 16, 2003
40,951
69,167
113
Omaha, NE
Yes, I’m pro-life,” Shealy said. “I’m also pro-life for the mother, the life she has with her children who are already born. I care about the children who are forced into adulthood that was made up by a legislature full of men so they can take a victory lap and feel good about it.”
“It disgusts me,” she added.


Just shut the f*ck up, idiot.
 

lucas80

HR King
Gold Member
Jan 30, 2008
97,576
127,862
113
These Rs complaining about draconian bans can kindly go screw themselves.
The dog caught the car and now has no idea what to do. The Republicans had no plan for what happened when Roe was overturned. They rode the most vocal, most energized part of the GOP for years on this issue, and are now acting shocked that the extremists want extremist laws enforced.
 

Keehawk

HR Heisman
May 24, 2011
5,311
5,001
113
The dog caught the car and now has no idea what to do. The Republicans had no plan for what happened when Roe was overturned. They rode the most vocal, most energized part of the GOP for years on this issue, and are now acting shocked that the extremists want extremist laws enforced.
Saving innocent human life is not always easy.
 

nu2u

HR Legend
Aug 10, 2006
15,313
17,615
113
The dog caught the car and now has no idea what to do. The Republicans had no plan for what happened when Roe was overturned. They rode the most vocal, most energized part of the GOP for years on this issue, and are now acting shocked that the extremists want extremist laws enforced.
That's right, the conservtive religious zealots aren't going to give an inch now that they have word from the Supreme Court that their is no constituttional right to privacy. The Catholic heirarchy and evangelical Baptist peachers are adamant - if the cell is fetilized, it is murder to terminate under any circumstance. The push for exceptions will splinter the GOP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman

franklinman

HR All-American
Apr 5, 2011
3,512
3,925
113
That's right, the conservtive religious zealots aren't going to give an inch now that they have word from the Supreme Court that their is no constituttional right to privacy. The Catholic heirarchy and evangelical Baptist peachers are adamant - if the cell is fetilized, it is murder to terminate under any circumstance. The push for exceptions will splinter the GOP.
Ya but the conservative political hacks have already lost in the eyes of the majority, lowest SCOTUS rating in many decades, with little respect.
 

Latest posts