ADVERTISEMENT

S.F. middle school delays election results because winners not diverse enough

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,354
62,361
113

On Oct. 6, Everett Middle School welcomed a special visitor. As students cheered and clapped, Chelsea Clinton walked across the San Francisco academy’s wooden stage and hugged Everett’s mascot, a humongous brown and white owl.

Clinton was at Everett to promote a book, but when she learned that the public school was about to hold its first student council election in several years, the former first daughter couldn’t help but chime in with words of encouragement.

“I don’t think anyone should ever rule out politics as a way to make a difference,” she said, according to ABC 7.

If students were inspired, however, it didn’t last long.

When Everett held its election three days later, its principal promptly refused to release the results, saying she was concerned that the winners were not diverse enough.

While she would ultimately relent and release the results, her decision spurred anger among parents and kids who felt that the principal was putting diversity ahead of democracy. Critics compared her to a dictator who scraps elections when results don’t go her way. It was the middle school equivalent of hanging chads and a near political crisis, only without a Supreme Court to hear the case.

What was supposed to be a civics lesson had quickly devolved into chaos.

“The whole school voted for those people, so it is not like people rigged the game,” seventh-grader Sebastian Kaplan told KRON 4, who had run for class representative yet had no clue a week later if he won. “But in a way, now it is kinda being rigged.”

The controversy began as soon as the Oct. 9 election results rolled in. Everett’s 36-year-old principal, Lena Van Haren, was disturbed by the lack of diversity among the winners, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

The school sits in San Francisco’s Mission District, a historically diverse neighborhood that has recently struggled with both gentrification and gang violence. Everett is as much a melting pot as the community, with 80 percent of its population comprised of students of color. Only 20 percent of students are white, Van Haren told KTVU.

The results of the election, however, gave the principal pause.

Literally.

Students weren’t exactly expecting real-time streaming results, but they were surprised not to learn who had won when they showed up to school the following Monday. By Wednesday, the situation was getting weird.

On Thursday, nearly a week after the election, Van Haren sent out an e-mail to parents explaining her decision to withhold the election results.

“This is complex, but as a parent and a principal, I truly believe it behooves us to be thoughtful about our next steps here so that we can have a diverse student council that is truly representative of all voices at Everett,” she wrote, according to the Chronicle. Van Haren then suggested the school “add positions” to improve diversity, KTVU reported.

And that’s when the civics hit the fan.

Students who had run for office were left in limbo, wondering if they had won or lost and if it even mattered anymore. Parents were equally confused. Eventually, that confusion turned into annoyance, then anger.

“I wanted to get more involved and change some things,” Kaplan, the seventh-grader running for class representative, told KRON 4, practically quoting Chelsea Clinton verbatim. “I feel like it is disrespectful to all the people who were running,” he said of the strange silence over election results.

Parents turned to local media to claim that political correctness had trumped common sense — not to mention democracy.

“My criticism of the Everett administration is their good intention got in the way of their common sense,” parent Todd David told the Chronicle. “It’s really, really disturbing to me that withholding the results somehow equals social justice or equity. That is where I totally disconnect. I’m like, ‘Whoa.’ ”

Others said that diversity is all fine and good, but it should have been addressed before the election, not afterward in an ad hoc manner.

“That should have been something [discussed] prior to elections and prior to the campaigning process,” another Everett parent, Bianca Gutierrez, told KTVU.

The irony that a middle school student election had turned into a political quagmire worthy of Congress wasn’t lost on anyone.

“If we can’t teach them the right way it’s supposed to work, then we are really just letting our kids down,” Gutierrez said. “My heart goes out to the kids because they’re confused still about the issue.”

If the story upset students and parents in the Mission District, it soon spread to the rest of San Francisco, and beyond.

“Well, the children’s voices were heard. They just seemed to be less obsessed with race than some administrators are,” wrote UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh, in his blog Volokh Conspiracy hosted by The Washington Post.

In the echo chamber of the Internet, the Everett Middle School student body election quickly became twisted into the latest salvo in America’s culture war.

“San Fran Middle School Cancels Student Elections Because Too Many White People Elected,” ran a factually incorrect headline on the conservative Web site the Daily Caller.

“Middle School Principal Blocks Student Election Results After Not Enough Minorities Win,” read a slightly less mistaken headline in Mediaite.

In the comments section of local media, critics demanded Van Haren’s resignation. Some ominously quoted George Orwell’s dystopian novel “1984.” Others compared her to a slew of strongmen.

“I’m sure Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini and Napoleon did the same in the name of some bulls— excuse,” another wrote.

Amid the hyperbole, however, there was a genuine, general concern that the principal’s decision to sit on the election results was not the most democratic example.

“So it’s more important to be ‘diverse’ than democratic,” one commenter wrote sarcastically. “Good to know.”

“You do not get to negate … democratic election results because you would have preferred them to be different,” another echoed.

“Kids chose based on popularity,” added a third. “Can the PC diversity crap.”

On Monday, as news of Everett’s election went national, Van Haren ultimately gave in, going from class to class and announcing the election results.


“While there was some diversity among the 10 winners, no English learners were elected, even though they make up about a third of enrollment,” the Chronicle reported. “African American and Latino students were underrepresented, while white, Asian and mixed-race students, who are in the minority at the school, took the top four spots.”


http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...n-results-because-winners-not-diverse-enough/
 
LOL, this principal should move to Venuzuela, where all the elections work out the way they're supposed to work out.
 
The school is made up of only 20% white kids. Lots of white kids won the election. Doesn't that meet the modern definition of diverse?

Oh you just don't understand white men will continue to be defined as the majority and minorities and women defined as the minority even when those things are clearly false.

For example even though only 20% of the school is white they are considered the majority and the other 80% considered the oppressed minority.

Shoot like 52% of the population is women but I've had an otherwise smart person I know tell me that women are a minority despite this fact.

And we're still giving away tons of money to female college students because they are under represented in colleges even though they are now a sizable majority of college students.

Reality is and never will be a barrier to victim status for several groups.
 
The(liberal) principle made a mistake. This happens a lot when adults decide how children should act.
I fixed that first sentence for you.Actually she did not make a mistake. As many libs in the country she believes diversity is more important than any thing else. Even more important than fair elections.
 
So how exactly did those cracka-ass crackas get elected? After all, the principal was concerned about the results....which of course is thinly-veiled code for "Hmmm...I wonder why all of the kids didn't vote lockstep along racial lines like they're supposed to." It certainly does raise the question though....if less than 18% of the winners were Caucasian, would she have withheld the results and contemplated voiding the election or forming inclusion committees on the grounds that the minority whites were underrepresented? Unfortunately, Doodle suspects that question is pretty well moot.

“It’s not OK for a school that is really, really diverse to have the student representatives majority white,” Van Haren said. Interesting quote from the principal. Interesting because while she has a major problem with the student representation in a "really, really diverse" school being majority white, even as chosen by a free and fair election....she has NO problem whatsoever with that very same "really, really diverse" school having whitey as its Principal and top administrator. In fact, only 18% of the student body is Caucasian but 66% (in other words a massive majority) of its administrators are white. http://ems-sfusd-ca.schoolloop.com/cms/page_view?d=x&piid=&vpid=1287819235585

All of that having been said, the fact that these students appear to have voted primarily for the candidates they thought were the best vs. just going for the candidates who look or talk the most like them, gives Ol' Doodle hope for the future of our nation. Of course, this assumes (a big assumption in this case) that this particular principal and others like her in these kids' future, are not successful in permanently drumming the necessity of racial monolithism into their brains before they reach actual voting age.
 
VoteForPedro_zpsrcnrp8yu.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Isn't this likely to lead to increased racial tensions and problems at the school? Aren't they implicitly telling the students, if you are Hispanic you should vote for a Hispanic candidate, if you are black you should vote for a black candidate, and so on. If I was a student that's how I would interpret it. Too many students of color voted for a white kid and that's such a big problem that we need to hold the election over again until you get it right...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Paris
Fun that this was the first student election in several years according to the article. I bet it will be several more before the next one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeye54545
This reminds me of the South Park episode were the kids were labeled racists over a flag they drew with no ill intentions. Like in this case it were the adults (or just adult in this example) who caused a raucous for no good reason.
 
This exemplifies why racial divides will continue to be problematic in America. Instead of encouraging our kids to ignore race, we encourage them to place emphasis on it - to emphasize what makes us different as opposed to what makes us similar. If the liberals truly want racial equality, let's stop encouraging our younger generation to continually focus on racial diversity.
 
This exemplifies why racial divides will continue to be problematic in America. Instead of encouraging our kids to ignore race, we encourage them to place emphasis on it - to emphasize what makes us different as opposed to what makes us similar. If the liberals truly want racial equality, let's stop encouraging our younger generation to continually focus on racial diversity.

Agreed as long as you can't find measurable barriers to any certain group then it's ridiculous and stupid to look at how everything turns out and start pounding the table because there isn't enough diversity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
...“It’s not OK for a school that is really, really diverse to have the student representatives majority white,” Van Haren said. Interesting quote from the principal. Interesting because while she has a major problem with the student representation in a "really, really diverse" school being majority white, even as chosen by a free and fair election....she has NO problem whatsoever with that very same "really, really diverse" school having whitey as its Principal and top administrator. In fact, only 18% of the student body is Caucasian but 66% (in other words a massive majority) of its administrators are white. ...

Precisely!! If this crazy principal really had principles...she would step down for EXACTLY the reason she withheld the results. She is not representative of the body...but I am sure that is different somehow...
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT