ADVERTISEMENT

Sarah McBride is ready for her debut in Congress

lucas80

HB King
Gold Member
Jan 30, 2008
123,102
185,766
113
Interesting read about Delaware's representative to the US House which will be seated in a few days. It's much harder to hate someone when you get to know them and see who they are through their accomplishments. Trigger alert for some of you, there are kind, complimentary words from McBrides Republican colleagues in the Delaware legislature.
Those that know her respect her.
https://apnews.com/article/sarah-mc...btq-delaware-9cce7f778e6b57dfdb08986d7410404e
 
It sounds as if she wants to maintain a certain level of political decorum ... so let us respect her efforts.

The (We) Republicans need to stay away from certain nickel/dime issues such as bathroom rights. (Isn't there a war in Ukraine? Isn't there an inflation crisis? I hate these little nickel-dime, talk-show-created issues relating to bathrooms or documents or the banging, drugging, and the want-to-be-grifting life of Presidential children.)

She says she is a girl, and I notice she wears a lot of dresses, so let her pee where she likes. If she asks for a private in-office bathroom, build her one ... There is no need for a law or a resolution.

Again! Inflation anyone?
 
Last edited:
It sounds as if she wants to maintain a certain level of political decorum.

The (We) Republicans need to stay away from certain nickel/dime issues such as bathroom rights. (Isn't there a war in Ukraine? Isn't there an inflation crisis? I hate these little nickel-dime, talk-show-created issues relating to bathrooms or pieces of paper or the banging, drugging, and the want-to-be-grifting life of Presidential children.)

She says she is a girl, and I notice she wears a lot of dresses, so let her pee where she likes. If she asks for a private in-office bathroom, build her one ... There is no need for a law or a resolution.

Again! Inflation anyone?
Good post.

And I agree.

What’s Trump’s plan to address inflation?
 
Is she the one that used to make all those sad songs and were played over video of pets needing to be adopted?

‘Ef that chick and the person who kept cutting onions near me every time that commercial came on
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Gimmered
Good post.

And I agree.

What’s Trump’s plan to address inflation?
I think it is the same one as before; grow the economy faster than government spending. Put more money into the pockets of entrepreneurs and their private sector customers ... and keeping it out of the hands of the permanent bureaucrat class (who create nothing but paperwork and lawsuits).

Step one would be to increase domestic drilling and refining. Step two would be to address the hair-ball that is generically called "Healthcare." ...

There is an entire program that he was pursuing, but in the end, I suspect tariffs and deportations will be limited. I guess the deportations are needed ... just to free up a few houses if nothing else, but he could lower the urgency by going after high materials prices. (Logging instead of forest fires anyone?)
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
I think it is the same one as before; grow the economy faster than government spending. Put more money into the pockets of entrepreneurs and their private sector customers ... and keeping it out of the hands of the permanent bureaucrat class who create nothing that forwards overall economic growth.

Step one would be to increase domestic drilling and refining. Step two would be to address the hair-ball that is generically called "Healthcare." ...

There is an entire program that he was pursuing, but in the end, I suspect tariffs and deportations will be limited. I guess the deportations are needed ... just to free up a few houses if nothing else, but he could lower the urgency by going after high materials prices. (Logging instead of forest fires anyone?)
Go Away Do Not Want GIF
 
Two issues:
  1. Inflation
  2. Attempting to do an end-run on this issue.
................................................
Here is the key paragraph and a summary headline:

They spent too much money at the wrong time and then waved away higher prices.

Nevertheless, it is a good time to look back on the Biden years and consider whether and to what extent economic policy actually did play a role in last week’s outcome. Based on the early analyses, at least, there does appear to be one glaring economic issue that motivated many voters to pull the lever for Donald Trump—inflation—and several glaring errors from the Biden administration. Though these errors might not have driven Kamala Harris’ defeat, in hindsight they probably made things even harder than they already were.

............................................................
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
Most of what you linked was about what the voters got wrong, but this part I totally agree with.

And Then Came More Tariffs and Protectionism
There were, in fact, several tools that Biden could have used to ease some of the price pain yet remained firmly in an Oval Office drawer. As we discussed in 2022 when inflation was at its peak, chief among them was tariffs and other U.S. trade restrictions. In particular, economic analyses showed that, while lowering trade barriers wouldn’t solve inflation, it would provide a significant, one-off reduction in the prices of many goods.
Most fixes are out of the president’s hands, and every little bit helps—especially for a White House supposedly putting “all tools on the table to beat inflation.” Thus, as [economist] Furman told Axios recently, “Removing the China tariffs is the single-largest policy lever to bring down inflation that President Biden has.” This solution should come as no surprise to the president. His own treasury secretary (and former Fed chair), Janet Yellen has, for example, repeatedly acknowledged that lifting U.S. tariffs might help cool prices a bit. Deputy National Security Adviser Daleep Singh recently said the same thing. Indeed, in targeting our ports for anti-inflation action, the “blame the supply side” president has himself (tacitly) admitted that easing U.S. trade restrictions could ease inflation. New import competition might also push American corporations to lower their markups and accept lower profits—another target of Democrats’ economic ire. So you’d think, then, that a Biden administration laser-focused on inflation (and with limited options for congressional action) would be eager to use the ample discretion afforded to it under U.S. trade law to roll back any and all restrictions on imports.
Admittedly, nixing all the Trump-era tariffs was a political non-starter, but they didn’t cut a single one and then added even more, along with other forms of price-inflating protectionism, such as enhanced “Buy America” restrictions for infrastructure and IRA-funded green energy projects—restrictions that not only increased prices but also delayed the projects’ rollout. The union-soaked politics of all this “worker-centric” protectionism are obvious, but, as left(ish) Matt Yglesias warned in May of this year, it came at a huge price (no pun intended): additional fuel—financially and rhetorically—to the White House’s biggest economic fire, inflation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RagnarLothbrok
Two issues:
  1. Inflation
  2. Attempting to do an end-run on this issue.
................................................
Here is the key paragraph and a summary headline:

They spent too much money at the wrong time and then waved away higher prices.

Nevertheless, it is a good time to look back on the Biden years and consider whether and to what extent economic policy actually did play a role in last week’s outcome. Based on the early analyses, at least, there does appear to be one glaring economic issue that motivated many voters to pull the lever for Donald Trump—inflation—and several glaring errors from the Biden administration. Though these errors might not have driven Kamala Harris’ defeat, in hindsight they probably made things even harder than they already were.

............................................................
If you read the rest of the article, it pointed out the stimulus checks under Trump’s watch also contributed to inflation and that COVID disrupting supply chains was the main culprit.

Their entire point was that voter perception of Biden being responsible for inflation is why Harris lost. The truth is Trump was just as responsible for inflation as Biden with COVID being the main culprit.

So, back to the original question. How is Trump going to get inflation under control? I am not convinced by your previous answer.
 
I believe that inflation rose about 3 or 4% over wages.
As of November 2024, the inflation rate in the United States was 2.7%:

  • Consumer Price Index (CPI): The CPI for All Urban Consumers increased 2.7% from November 2023 to November 2024.
  • Food prices: Food prices were 2.4% higher than a year earlier.
  • Energy prices: Energy prices were 3.2% lower than a year earlier.
  • Core prices: Prices for all items less food and energy rose 3.3% over this 12-month period.
Inflation has cooled dramatically since peaking at 9.1 percent in the summer of 2022. The slowdown has given Fed officials the cover to begin dialing back interest rates from a 23-year high.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gimmered
1. Inflation is 2.7%
2. Was Inflation over the last 4 years limited to the USA or was it worldwide? What were the rates of other industrialized nations in comparison to here?
1. That is the nominal rate of inflation; the CPI which is merely a government statistic that does not account for the cost of borrowing money or the price of gasoline
 
50k seems like he'd be good for some micro aggression in the office place. Hopefully Speaker Johnson, if he lasts, promotes a professional, courteous workplace. I suspect Nancy Mace and MTG will create a spectacle at the first opportunity to get on Fox versus doing their actual jobs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artradley
If you read the rest of the article, it pointed out the stimulus checks under Trump’s watch also contributed to inflation and that COVID disrupting supply chains was the main culprit.

Their entire point was that voter perception of Biden being responsible for inflation is why Harris lost. The truth is Trump was just as responsible for inflation as Biden with COVID being the main culprit.

So, back to the original question. How is Trump going to get inflation under control? I am not convinced by your previous answer.
All this. I still can't comprehend how people keep saying inflation is an issue. We are at historic inflation levels. The hyper inflation is over, it sucked, there's nothing we can do about it now.
 
As of November 2024, the inflation rate in the United States was 2.7%:

  • Consumer Price Index (CPI): The CPI for All Urban Consumers increased 2.7% from November 2023 to November 2024.
  • Food prices: Food prices were 2.4% higher than a year earlier.
  • Energy prices: Energy prices were 3.2% lower than a year earlier.
  • Core prices: Prices for all items less food and energy rose 3.3% over this 12-month period.
Inflation has cooled dramatically since peaking at 9.1 percent in the summer of 2022. The slowdown has given Fed officials the cover to begin dialing back interest rates from a 23-year high.
I understand that inflation has cooled, but people were looking at the overall price increases during Biden's term, not the current inflation rate. For the most part, the US did a great job managing inflation considering the 5 trillion dollars it printed along with the tax cuts that when coupled with the increased spending drove up the national debt, the supply chain issues and the labor shortages.

While I can't go into complete details, over the last 5 years, the factory I work in within a Fortune 250 company was forced to give up entire markets costing us several millions annually because of the labor shortage and supply chain issues. From my perspective this will have a much longer/larger affect than the inflation did.
 
Larry Summers told Biden that passing the inflation reduction act aka the green supporters payoff bill, right after Covid would be extremely inflationary and Biden said, screw you, I’m doing it anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: libbity bibbity
i cannot figure out why nancy mace feels so threatened by her? i have not been in alot of womens bathrooms but of the few i saw they have individual stalls so unless you see them go in you wouldn't know whether its occupied by a man or a woman or a kangaroo.
Perhaps her husband doesn't want her looking at others guys' hairy cocks?
 
It sounds as if she wants to maintain a certain level of political decorum ... so let us respect her efforts.

The (We) Republicans need to stay away from certain nickel/dime issues such as bathroom rights. (Isn't there a war in Ukraine? Isn't there an inflation crisis? I hate these little nickel-dime, talk-show-created issues relating to bathrooms or documents or the banging, drugging, and the want-to-be-grifting life of Presidential children.)

She says she is a girl, and I notice she wears a lot of dresses, so let her pee where she likes. If she asks for a private in-office bathroom, build her one ... There is no need for a law or a resolution.

Again! Inflation anyone?

Inflation continues to be a big problem. Biden and the D’s keep ignoring it. They don’t seem to realize that government spending contributes to inflation.
 
Larry Summers told Biden that passing the inflation reduction act aka the green supporters payoff bill, right after Covid would be extremely inflationary and Biden said, screw you, I’m doing it anyway.
Biden owns the inflation as Trump owns the immigration issues.



They are eating the dogs, they are eating the cats, they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: abby97
She says she is a girl, and I notice she wears a lot of dresses, so let her pee where she likes. If she asks for a private in-office bathroom, build her one ... There is no need for a law or a resolution.

Women spaces are for women. If you build a private in-office bathroom for one, you should build them for all. The solution is single bathroom units that anyone can use.
 
Biden owns the inflation as Trump owns the immigration issues.



They are eating the dogs, they are eating the cats, they are eating the pets of the people that live there.

Although it will take time and a lot of battles with D’s, Trump will eventually fix Biden’s immigration and inflation problems.
 
Larry Summers told Biden that passing the inflation reduction act aka the green supporters payoff bill, right after Covid would be extremely inflationary and Biden said, screw you, I’m doing it anyway.
Oops swing and a miss. Try again. I bolded some points that will support you and others that suggest you are full of shit. Please feel free to read it all and draw your own conclusions.







Manufacturing on the rise​

Biden has made reviving American manufacturing a central part of his economic agenda. Biden signed into law legislation that incentivizes domestic manufacturing around clean energy, computer chips and other areas.

The White House has hailed a surge in private investment in American manufacturing under Biden’s watch.

“It used to be: find the cheapest market in the world, send the job overseas, and bring the product back. Not on my watch. Right here, we’re doing — we’re creating jobs in America, and we’re exporting American products,” Biden said during a speech about “Bidenomics” in Philadelphia last month.

Booming manufacturing investment has helped boost the US economy, with Morgan Stanley economists citing that as a key reason for their brighter economic projections.

Summers said he agrees with a “large part of” what the administration has done, including the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPS Act, which sought to boost domestic semiconductor manufacturing.

“I believe those two signature items of Biden policies were appropriate steps,” Summers said.


Inflation concerns persist​

However, the famed economist and former president emeritus of Harvard University, and former Secretary of the Treasury, is taking issue with the doctrine behind those policies.

“We do not have a problem of a shortfall of jobs,” Summers said, noting that the number of open jobs relative to people looking for work remains high. “We do have a problem of costs.”

High inflation has hurt workers by eating into their paychecks. Real wages, adjusted for inflation, have declined, making it harder for Americans to get by.

Summers argued that globalization and the reduction of trade barriers have helped consumers by lowering inflation and ushering in a period of low interest rates.

“That is why I am so concerned by the administration’s attitudes, or non-attitudes, toward trade,” he said.

On the antitrust front, last week the Biden administration released new guidelines that signal officials plan to continue a tough approach when it comes to stopping harmful mergers.

“Unchecked consolidation threatens the free and fair markets upon which our economy is based,” Attorney General Merrick Garland in a statement last week. “These updated merger guidelines respond to modern market realities and will enable the Justice Department to transparently and effectively protect the American people from the damage that anticompetitive mergers cause.”

Summers, however, argued that the new guidelines “discard” a long-standing focus on lowering consumer costs when it comes to antitrust actions.

“Yes, we should enforce the antitrust law more than we have over the last 30 years,” Summers said. “But we should do that in service of a doctrine of higher incomes through lower costs for consumers.”
 
  • Haha
Reactions: abby97
All this. I still can't comprehend how people keep saying inflation is an issue. We are at historic inflation levels. The hyper inflation is over, it sucked, there's nothing we can do about it now.
These morons think consumer goods pricing will fall back to 2019 levels magically once DJT enters the WH. It’s never going to happen.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT