ADVERTISEMENT

Scarborough: Trump's A Bigot

dandh

HB Legend
Nov 11, 2002
19,587
9,002
113
Twin Cities MN
From the linked Washington Post Editorial by Joe Scarborough:

They weren’t hard questions to answer.


“Do you condemn David Duke? And the Ku Klux Klan?”


A simple “yes” would have worked. But on Sunday, Donald Trump swatted away the easy answers and instead feigned ignorance about the KKK and its most infamous Grand Wizard. The Republican frontrunner’s failure to provide what should have been a simple answer has raised even more disturbing questions about the man who is on course to lock down the GOP’s nomination for president.


The first question is why would Trump pretend to be so ignorant of American history that he refused to pass judgment on the Ku Klux Klan before receiving additional information? What kind of facts could possibly mitigate a century of sins committed by a violent hate group whose racist crimes terrorized Americans and placed a shameful blot on this nation’s history?


Why would the same man who claims to have “the world’s greatest memory” say “I don’t know anything about David Duke” just two days after he condemned the former Klansman in a nationally televised press conference? And with that amazing memory, how could Donald Trump have forgotten that he himself refused to run for president as a Reform Party nominee in 2000 because “Klansman” David Duke was a member of that same party?


These are questions that have no good answers for a Republican Party on the verge of nominating a man who sounds more like a Dixiecrat from the 1950s than the kind of nominee the GOP needs four years after losing Hispanics by 44 percent, Asian-Americans by 47 percent, and black Americans by 87 percent.


The entire article is linked below.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...estions/?postshare=4761456722403414&tid=ss_tw
 
  • Like
Reactions: N_fuego and dgordo
From the linked article, Trump explains his failure to respond to Tapper:

Donald Trump blamed CNN for providing a "lousy earpiece" in explaining his non-answer to the network on Sunday when asked to disavow the Ku Klux Klan and David Duke.

"I'm sitting in a house in Florida with a very bad earpiece that they gave me, and you could hardly hear what he was saying. But what I heard was various groups, and I don't mind disavowing anybody, and I disavowed David Duke and I disavowed him the day before at a major news conference, which is surprising because he was at the major news conference, CNN was at the major news conference, and they heard me very easily disavow David Duke," the Republican presidential frontrunner explained on NBC's "Today."

"Now, I go, and I sit down again, I have a lousy earpiece that is provided by them, and frankly, he talked about groups," Trump said, referring to the question from CNN's Jake Tapper, who asked him about a call from the Anti-Defamation League to denounce the groups endorsing his presidential run. "He also talked about groups. And I have no problem with disavowing groups, but I'd at least like to know who they are. It would be very unfair to disavow a group, Matt, if the group shouldn't be disavowed. I have to know who the groups are. But I disavowed David Duke."

A day before the Super Tuesday primaries, Trump made sure to repeat the fact that he had disavowed Duke.

“Now, if you look on Facebook, right after that, I also disavowed David Duke. When we looked at it, and looked at the question, I disavowed David Duke," he said. "So I disavowed David Duke all weekend long, on Facebook, on Twitter and obviously, it’s never enough. Ridiculous.”


Link to entire article below:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-...nald-trump-interview-kkk-219953#ixzz41Zo1Sobq
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-...nald-trump-interview-kkk-219953#ixzz41Zo1Sobq
 
Solid conservative tea bagger response there: Blame the media.

From the linked article, Trump explains his failure to respond to Tapper:

Donald Trump blamed CNN for providing a "lousy earpiece" in explaining his non-answer to the network on Sunday when asked to disavow the Ku Klux Klan and David Duke.

"I'm sitting in a house in Florida with a very bad earpiece that they gave me, and you could hardly hear what he was saying. But what I heard was various groups, and I don't mind disavowing anybody, and I disavowed David Duke and I disavowed him the day before at a major news conference, which is surprising because he was at the major news conference, CNN was at the major news conference, and they heard me very easily disavow David Duke," the Republican presidential frontrunner explained on NBC's "Today."

"Now, I go, and I sit down again, I have a lousy earpiece that is provided by them, and frankly, he talked about groups," Trump said, referring to the question from CNN's Jake Tapper, who asked him about a call from the Anti-Defamation League to denounce the groups endorsing his presidential run. "He also talked about groups. And I have no problem with disavowing groups, but I'd at least like to know who they are. It would be very unfair to disavow a group, Matt, if the group shouldn't be disavowed. I have to know who the groups are. But I disavowed David Duke."

A day before the Super Tuesday primaries, Trump made sure to repeat the fact that he had disavowed Duke.

“Now, if you look on Facebook, right after that, I also disavowed David Duke. When we looked at it, and looked at the question, I disavowed David Duke," he said. "So I disavowed David Duke all weekend long, on Facebook, on Twitter and obviously, it’s never enough. Ridiculous.”


Link to entire article below:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-...nald-trump-interview-kkk-219953#ixzz41Zo1Sobq
 
From the linked Washington Post Editorial by Joe Scarborough:

They weren’t hard questions to answer.


“Do you condemn David Duke? And the Ku Klux Klan?”


A simple “yes” would have worked. But on Sunday, Donald Trump swatted away the easy answers and instead feigned ignorance about the KKK and its most infamous Grand Wizard. The Republican frontrunner’s failure to provide what should have been a simple answer has raised even more disturbing questions about the man who is on course to lock down the GOP’s nomination for president.


The first question is why would Trump pretend to be so ignorant of American history that he refused to pass judgment on the Ku Klux Klan before receiving additional information? What kind of facts could possibly mitigate a century of sins committed by a violent hate group whose racist crimes terrorized Americans and placed a shameful blot on this nation’s history?


Why would the same man who claims to have “the world’s greatest memory” say “I don’t know anything about David Duke” just two days after he condemned the former Klansman in a nationally televised press conference? And with that amazing memory, how could Donald Trump have forgotten that he himself refused to run for president as a Reform Party nominee in 2000 because “Klansman” David Duke was a member of that same party?


These are questions that have no good answers for a Republican Party on the verge of nominating a man who sounds more like a Dixiecrat from the 1950s than the kind of nominee the GOP needs four years after losing Hispanics by 44 percent, Asian-Americans by 47 percent, and black Americans by 87 percent.


The entire article is linked below.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...estions/?postshare=4761456722403414&tid=ss_tw
Much ado about nothing. It only would have been a story if Donald had come out rationalizing the case for or supporting Dukes. He did neither.

I'm not a Trump supporter, but you can see where the press is going now that The Donald looks to be the prohibitive favorite to face their darling Hillary in November.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sijoint
Much ado about nothing. It only would have been a story if Donald had come out rationalizing the case for or supporting Dukes. He did neither.

I'm not a Trump supporter, but you can see where the press is going now that The Donald looks to be the prohibitive favorite to face their darling Hillary in November.

Ah, the wingnut paranoid delusions are always so cute. Gotta love their victim mentality!
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
It's pretty easy to understand why Trump won't disavow the KKK - he wants their votes. He's spent a good part of his campaign railing against brown people, and now he's going to get the racist vote. So he'll say some bullshit like, "I couldn't hear the earpiece," so that his racist supporters keep supporting him, and the rest of the mouth breathing morons who follow him can tell themselves that he's not a racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
1. Joe has spent a lot of time knobslobbing Donald Trump on the air. He's a little late to start finding disagreeable things about Trump with his track record of stupid comments.
2. I don't think Trump himself is a racist. I think he belongs to that demonstrably worse category of people who exploit racial tension and ramp up the fervor in the truly bigoted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk and Awe
1. Joe has spent a lot of time knobslobbing Donald Trump on the air. He's a little late to start finding disagreeable things about Trump with his track record of stupid comments.
2. I don't think Trump himself is a racist. I think he belongs to that demonstrably worse category of people who exploit racial tension and ramp up the fervor in the truly bigoted.

People who exploit racial tension for their own benefit = racist. Donald Trump is a terrible person, period.
 
Obama routinely exploits racial tensions for his own benefit. So I guess that means you think Obama is a racist. Got it.

So in your mind promoting equality is exploiting racial tensions? While I don't always agree with Obama's methods, I don't believe he would purposely incite violence and hatred to get votes. Trump does exactly that.
 
Last edited:
1. Joe has spent a lot of time knobslobbing Donald Trump on the air. He's a little late to start finding disagreeable things about Trump with his track record of stupid comments.
2. I don't think Trump himself is a racist. I think he belongs to that demonstrably worse category of people who exploit racial tension and ramp up the fervor in the truly bigoted.

I don't think Morning Joe is doing anything except covering the news. Politically, Trump and to a lesser degree Sanders are the BIG political stories of the year. Trump makes himself readily available to Morning Joe, moreso than other candidates...according to Scarborougho.
Also, Joe and Mika stated back in July that Trump was a candidate to be taken seriously. Much to the chagrin of the other panelists/guests on Morning Joe. And do you know what......Joe and Mika were right on this one. They called it first. And now it appears that trump will be the GOPs POTUS nominee in November.

A sidebar...today (Monday) Scarborougho predicted the end of the GOP if Trump gets the party's nomination. He said there is no way "the Party of Lincoln" can run a candidate like Trump on their national ticket.
 
So in your mind promoting equality is exploiting racial tensions? While I don't always agree with Obama's methods, I don't believe he would purposely incite violence and hatred to get votes. Trump does exactly that.


You seem to ignore the obvious. To each their own.
 
Neat interviews on Rachel Maddow's show. An NBC reporter was at a Trump rally in Valdosta, GA, and asked several people if the white supremacist endorsements made them negative to Trump. The young woman froze, then said, "No comment". The old white woman said why would it, they are just people and they have their own opinions. Pressed a little more if it made her think negatively since these people were endorsing Trump. Nope, she said.
The old white dude was pretty defiant in saying, "We are the same age", then said they'd grown up at the same time… Guess he doesn't like the ethnics.
 
It's pretty easy to understand why Trump won't disavow the KKK - he wants their votes. He's spent a good part of his campaign railing against brown people, and now he's going to get the racist vote. So he'll say some bullshit like, "I couldn't hear the earpiece," so that his racist supporters keep supporting him, and the rest of the mouth breathing morons who follow him can tell themselves that he's not a racist.
The Mexicans illegally invade our country......he objects, wants to send them back...you
label him a racist. :oops: hahahahaha
 
The Mexicans illegally invade our country......he objects, wants to send them back...you
label him a racist. :oops: hahahahaha

Yep, that's exactly what I meant. I wasn't talking about the litany of other racist shit he's said, just the one thing.
 
Kinda' hard to take a blog seriously who's banner boasts, "Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out."

The truth hurts doesn't it?

You are your ilk are totalitarians.

PC police state supporters.

A vote for Trump is a vote against scum like you.
 
Scarborough is back to knobslobbing Trump this morning. Clearly Trump's mafia goons reached out to Scarborough.
 
From the linked Washington Post Editorial by Joe Scarborough:

They weren’t hard questions to answer.


“Do you condemn David Duke? And the Ku Klux Klan?”


A simple “yes” would have worked. But on Sunday, Donald Trump swatted away the easy answers and instead feigned ignorance about the KKK and its most infamous Grand Wizard. The Republican frontrunner’s failure to provide what should have been a simple answer has raised even more disturbing questions about the man who is on course to lock down the GOP’s nomination for president.


The first question is why would Trump pretend to be so ignorant of American history that he refused to pass judgment on the Ku Klux Klan before receiving additional information? What kind of facts could possibly mitigate a century of sins committed by a violent hate group whose racist crimes terrorized Americans and placed a shameful blot on this nation’s history?


Why would the same man who claims to have “the world’s greatest memory” say “I don’t know anything about David Duke” just two days after he condemned the former Klansman in a nationally televised press conference? And with that amazing memory, how could Donald Trump have forgotten that he himself refused to run for president as a Reform Party nominee in 2000 because “Klansman” David Duke was a member of that same party?


These are questions that have no good answers for a Republican Party on the verge of nominating a man who sounds more like a Dixiecrat from the 1950s than the kind of nominee the GOP needs four years after losing Hispanics by 44 percent, Asian-Americans by 47 percent, and black Americans by 87 percent.


The entire article is linked below.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...estions/?postshare=4761456722403414&tid=ss_tw
The best way to not be something is to label somebody else that thing first. Because it's better to be an a*hole than a "bigot," "homophobe," "sexist," "misogynist," etc.

Welcome to 2016 America.
 
Morning Joe’ segment goes off the rails when MSNBC host attacks Trump-hating Tea Party senator
Tea Party Republican from Nebraska sounded more like a liberal blogger as he called out Donald Trump and his media enablers during a contentious appearance Tuesday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) vowed Sunday that he would not support Trump, saying he would vote for a third party candidate if the real estate tycoon and reality TV star won the GOP presidential nomination.

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, long seen one of Trump’s biggest backers, and Mika Brzezinski seemed skeptical of Sasse’s claims as they hosted the freshman senator to talk about his opposition to Trump.

“Given who this guy is now, I can’t see how we think that,” Sasse said. “I don’t think this guy has any more core principles than a Kardashian marriage.”

Brzezinski asked the GOP lawmaker what he meant by “who this guy is now,” and she asked Sasse if he believed Trump could evolve or pivot.

“Do either of you think Donald Trump has core principles?” Sasse said.

Scarborough, who said Trump’s mishandling of a question about the Ku Klux Klan was “disqualifying,” asked the senator to name a constitutional conservative he would support, and Sasse said he didn’t want to play “the name game.”

“I’m not playing any games,” Scarborough said. “The future of our party, of our conservative cause in the republic is at stake — I’m not interested in playing games, either.”

Sasse said Scarborough had conflated the meaning of America, the republic and the Republican Party.

“Let’s first recognize that the Republican Party is just a tool, as all political parties are, and I signed up for the party of Abraham Lincoln, not the party of David Duke (and) Donald Trump,” Sasse said.

The 52-year-old Scarborough, who served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2001, interrupted the 44-year-old Sasse with an angry rebuttal.

“You were playing T-ball when I was fighting for those principles, for conservatism, for the Republican Party and this country, and I never conflated conservatism with Republicanism, and I’ve got thousands of speeches and words to say, but go ahead,” Scarborough said.

Sasse accused Scarborough of stooping to a “Donald Trump level” with his “T-ball” swipe, and the MSNBC host said he was trying to be on the senator’s side but he was “making it increasingly difficult by being defensive.”

“We have to acknowledge, the decline of the media is breathtaking,” Sasse said. “What’s happened, over the course of the last five or six months, is a whole lot of people have had a lot of fun playing with Donald Trump’s reality TV show about our kids’ future. I don’t think you believe that and I don’t think you really believe it, but I think here’s what we know comes next.”

“If Donald Trump becomes the likely Republican nominee in the next 60 days, all of a sudden, the media is going to grow up and take the guy apart in little pieces, because he’s not a serious adult,” Sasse added.

Scarborough said he had wondered on Dec. 8 whether Trump’s campaign was what Nazi Germany had looked like in the 1930s, and Sasse conceded he had warned against the GOP candidate’s rise.

“Can I ask you a serious question?” Sasse said. “Have you guys ever pursued it to make him distinguish between why his presidency would be different than dictator X, Y or Z’s? Because everywhere he goes, he plays these little race-baiting games, and he plays games with praising Putin, he says Kim Jong Un should be respected, he says the Chinese who smashed freedom fighters in Tiananmen Square in 1990 –”

At that point, Scarborough cut him off and said he has asked Trump about his admiration for Putin.

“I just don’t think you should put us in with the rest of the media,” Brzezinski said.

Scarborough complained that the media had been blamed for Trump, saying Republicans had allowed him to take over the GOP.

“Let’s back up, and let’s give Donald Trump credit for this,” Sasse said. “He absolutely, he can recognize an organization that’s susceptible to hostile takeover. The Republican Party has been vacuous for a really long time.”
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT