Schumer to Clinton: "Don't blame Russia or Comey...
- Thread starter mstp1992
- Start date
And yet, you were the one saying Hillary would have been the better POTUS? She sounds just like the Donald. Blaming everyone but herself for her troubles.
#****TrumpAndClinton
Remember when the Dems called everyone who questioned the birth certificate as crazy loons? Now they are blaming Russia. Good times!
Yes, she would still have been a better POTUS than Donald Trump. You or I would be a better POTUS than Donald Trump though so that's not really saying much.
That's debatable. Either way, the choices were Bevis and Butthead.
Don't be misled by the thread title - Russia and Trump collusion will only become more apparent in the future. But the Dems cannot just remain complacent and think that because Trump is a traitor and disaster, that will automatically help the Dems. The Dems have to stand for something and run better campaigns than the Clinton disaster.
That means they will have to run a better candidate then Clinton. Outside of the the left, she wasn't really well liked by moderates and swing voters.
Here's the thing, both things can be true. Hillary can be a terrible candidate and Trump can collude with Russia simultaneously.
That's true. But, Trump supporters will opt for the former, ignore the latter, and feel fully justified as a result.
She's playing the blame game for her loss. However, that means nothing with respect to her ability to govern effectively.
She still would have been a far better president than Trump.
I've explained this before but honestly my mind does not work like that and I don't know why. I write essentially like I speak and I pronounce then and than the same. It does not come naturally to me at all.
This isn't formal writing so I don't spend a lot of time cross checking it.
I understand that then is a comparison of time and than is a comparison of nouns or something like that. I have similar problems with Where/were
Chuck Schumer knows that there is a vacuum of
leadership in the Democrat party at the present time.
He is trying to politely push Hillary off the stage as
she babbles on about her loss last November.
There needs to be a new and fresh voice that now
speaks for the Democrats. They are still looking
for that voice and hoping the public will listen.
leadership in the Democrat party at the present time.
He is trying to politely push Hillary off the stage as
she babbles on about her loss last November.
There needs to be a new and fresh voice that now
speaks for the Democrats. They are still looking
for that voice and hoping the public will listen.
Minor correction, Hill was the candidate of the moderates. She was not well liked by the left.
If she were potus we would be in 6 different wars right now and she wouldn't answer the damn phone to help the troops she put in harms way.
Nat - stop trying to push HRC off on others. She was the the Democrats nomination and even after blackballing Bernie out she still couldn't win. If I recall on the ballot it said Hillary Rodham Clinton - Democrat and Donald Juge Trump - Republican. Nowhere did it say "moderate" on either.
Ds are a moderate party. The moderates sided with Hill over Bernie. Moderates out number the left in the D party which is why she got the most votes and why she won the primary. Bernie was the candidate of the left.
Center Left then. She obviously has her fans but her popularity was extremely limited. She was not a likable character.
Of the "Left" or the "far left" damn, can't keep all these party defections straight! Left, left moderate, alt-left, lefter then left, not as left as yesterday left, not our lefty, not left enough for me but for some...
Hillary ran a poor campaign. She was not out on the road nearly enough. Russia intervened but she could have over come it had she run a much better campaign. She and the Dems could have competed for the blue collar vote which should not have gone the direction of Trump.
However now the bigger issue is that Liberals need a tangible message. Not just that Trump is a buffoon and he must go. The Dems should be working on a better HCare plan- one that they could pose against the Ryan dogshit bill.
The Dems should be pushing for the infrastructure bill They need to also focus on corporate and business tax reform. Get a message out that has some meaning and a plan. Right now the brand of the left is whining and crying and I don't think that will win the day in 2018.
However now the bigger issue is that Liberals need a tangible message. Not just that Trump is a buffoon and he must go. The Dems should be working on a better HCare plan- one that they could pose against the Ryan dogshit bill.
The Dems should be pushing for the infrastructure bill They need to also focus on corporate and business tax reform. Get a message out that has some meaning and a plan. Right now the brand of the left is whining and crying and I don't think that will win the day in 2018.
She would have more experience in the Washington ways, yes. And that would equate to knowing the procedures. Doesn't mean her agenda would be any better for the other half of America.
Are you sure that it's just moderates vs. leftists?? There is a lot more to it.
First of all HRC was always a committed Democrat. Bernie is just a leftist who most often votes with Democrats. A lot of people didn't like him because he wasn't a part of the party officially.
Then I think HRC had more name recognition.
Plus I think there was a general feeling among the Dems that it was "her turn"
Then there was a lot of people who wanted her because they wanted to get a woman into the oval office.
I don't think it's quite that simple.
On top of that you are talking about leftist thought on economics only.
you all keep moving and renaming, it must be easier for you when on meds to keep track.
Keep up the great work - your party (or parties) is on fire!
"A Better Deal: Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Wages"
Do you honestly believe Clinton wouldn't be a friend to the wealthy? Her Wall Street speeches she wanted no part of releasing the transcripts? She is in bed with Big money like every other Politician that's been around for any significant period of time.
You're wishing upon a star and getting crapped on.
Talk about disagreeable.
Schumer is just now coming to this conclusion?
In Hillary's first public event after the loss (several months later) she "accepted responsibility" for he loss and then in her next few sentences blamed it on Comey and the Russians.
THAT was the time to say something,
In Hillary's first public event after the loss (several months later) she "accepted responsibility" for he loss and then in her next few sentences blamed it on Comey and the Russians.
THAT was the time to say something,
mstp1992 tries to present his opinions as fact. Then cannot understand that people would have opinions that differ from his.
Take a chill pill, kemosabe.
Of course, Wall Street is joined at the hip with her.
My whole point is that she would understand what it takes to govern and would be more effective in working with the other side -- if they wanted to.
Trump has all the cards and still can't do anything. That says about all you need to know about his ability to play well with others.
Well, for one thing, my opinion is right and yours is wrong. But, you're certainly entitled to your opinion.
