ADVERTISEMENT

Scientific Mask Study: "Masks mitigate the virus transmission by an order of magnitude -- 10 times less"

Finance85 said:
You are wasting your time. Whether or not you or @joesplace are right, @joesplace will never consider any amount of new evidence that will make him wrong.

He's entrenched in large droplets being the primary source of infection, and cites fomites as the alternative, usually ignoring aerosols.

While wearing a mask certainly helps against large droplets, to dismiss aerosols is stupid given the amount of spread. Check the story yesterday from the Costco in Yakima WA.

The US is so politically invested in wearing masks that studies in the US will be slanted that way. Studies require funding, right?

@joesplace says science evolves when it suits him, and ignores evolving science when it doesn't agree with his entrenched position. He requires peer reviewed studies until he doesn't.

I wear a mask. I believe it offers some level of protection, for me and others. I don't believe it's nearly as effective as we are told, but some protection is beneficial.

I encourage you to post facts, and don't get sucked into the name calling and derision towards riley and Joe. That only makes them defensive and less open to considering new science.
Click to expand...
So, in short, masks work and people should wear them. I agree.
 
shank hawk said:
“It’s either N95....OR YOU DONT HAVE PROTECTION.”
Click to expand...
Lol - you've been corrected on this before.

Osterholm: Stop mischaracterizing my comments about face masks
The leading epidemiologist has cleared the air over his previous comments on mask wearing.

He wrote:
"At the outset, I want to make several points crystal clear:
  • I support the wearing of cloth face coverings (masks) by the general public.
  • Stop citing CIDRAP and me as grounds to not wear masks, whether mandated or not.
  • Don't, however, use the wearing of cloth face coverings as an excuse to decrease other crucial, likely more effective, protective steps, like physical distancing
  • Also, don't use poorly conducted studies to support a contention that wearing cloth face coverings will drive the pandemic into the ground. But even if they reduce infection risk somewhat, wearing them can be important."
Click to expand...
https://bringmethenews.com/minnesot...ischaracterizing-my-comments-about-face-masks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
Joes Place said:
Again: you don't need "RCTs" for every study.
There are no RCTs for seatbelts and airbags ,bro. Look it up.
Click to expand...
You've been dominated. No more seatbelt arguments. Your argument is done. I pounded my girl and had a great NYE. Thanks though!
 
Finance85 said:
You need to give as much weight to the last two bullet points as the first two bullet points. That's where you keep getting resistance. Masks aren't a magic bullet.
Click to expand...
Certainly. They don't replace distancing, they aren't perfect but they work. That's been the point all along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
RileyHawk said:
I think it's absolutely hilarious that you went to all the effort to find these snippets and they simply don't. You failed again. BWAAAHAHAHAHA. Thanks for a great laugh to start off the new year.
Click to expand...
You've been dominated. I already made this previously so no skin off my balls. The data is there, time to shut up with your stupidity.
 
your_master5 said:
You've been dominated. I already made this previously so no skin off my balls. The data is there, time to shut up with your stupidity.
Click to expand...
GFY - you've been outed as an ignorant hack. You can use the Trump tactic of stating you won when you didn't - it's fitting. The emotional maturity of a middle school girl. Lol at you.
 
Finance85 said:
You are wasting your time. Whether or not you or @joesplace are right, @joesplace will never consider any amount of new evidence that will make him wrong.

He's entrenched in large droplets being the primary source of infection, and cites fomites as the alternative, usually ignoring aerosols.

While wearing a mask certainly helps against large droplets, to dismiss aerosols is stupid given the amount of spread. Check the story yesterday from the Costco in Yakima WA.

The US is so politically invested in wearing masks that studies in the US will be slanted that way. Studies require funding, right?

@joesplace says science evolves when it suits him, and ignores evolving science when it doesn't agree with his entrenched position. He requires peer reviewed studies until he doesn't.

I wear a mask. I believe it offers some level of protection, for me and others. I don't believe it's nearly as effective as we are told, but some protection is beneficial.

I encourage you to post facts, and don't get sucked into the name calling and derision towards riley and Joe. That only makes them defensive and less open to considering new science.
Click to expand...
I love calling them names because it suits them for how they've treated me in the past. But you are right they are slanted only to what they see. I provided a crap ton of science and they still sit there talking about droplets and giving analogies of stupidity claiming victory. Deep down they know in their smelly basements they don't have a leg to stand on.
 
RileyHawk said:
GFY - you've been outed as an ignorant hack. You can use the Trump tactic of stating you won when you didn't - it's fitting. The emotional maturity of a middle school girl. Lol at you.
Click to expand...
lol if that makes you feel better! It's obvious the arguments I provided and science provided outweigh any of the BS you and Joe put out there, so yeah you've been dominated. Go back to bed sweetie pie.
 
your_master5 said:
I love calling them names because it suits them for how they've treated me in the past. But you are right they are slanted only to what they see. I provided a crap ton of science and they still sit there talking about droplets and giving analogies of stupidity claiming victory. Deep down they know in their smelly basements they don't have a leg to stand on.
Click to expand...
Yes - and even your science concludes wearing masks is a good idea. Complete self owns because you're too ignorant to understand anything beyond a headline. It's been fun watching you flail and beat your chest and go all internet macho in your hissy fits. Very entertaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
RileyHawk said:
Lol - I'll bet "she" wore it all over. Hopefully you remembered to wash "her" out and disinfect the crevices.
Click to expand...
Don't be jealous you don't have a kinky ass hot lady in your bed with you. You can laugh it off as it's a play doll, but you know that to not be true :) Your balls must still be full. I feel bad for you.
 
RileyHawk said:
Yes - and even your science concludes wearing masks is a good idea. Complete self owns because your too ignorant to understand anything beyond a headline. It's been fun watching you flail and beat your chest and go all internet macho in your hissy fits. Very entertaining.
Click to expand...
No, it actually doesn't so clearly you're an idiot. Been fun watching you getting dominated
 
your_master5 said:
No, it actually doesn't so clearly you're an idiot. Been fun watching you getting dominated
Click to expand...
Lol - you're just like Trump. "I won in a landslide!". "I dominated!". No one buys it, but your emotional immaturity won't let you say anything different. Coupled with your internet macho man claims demonstrate that you are a very insecure person. If you weren't such a stupid dick, I would feel sorry for you.
 
Joes Place said:
U mean over the course of 20 years, the legislature figured out they WERE effective?

#Science!!!
Click to expand...
So legislatures are smart now? Doing something...ANYTHING, to make it look like you’re trying. In their defense, plexiglass is every bit as effective in stopping a virus as masks are...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Sharky1203

COVID levels are up to 19 times higher than reported, WHO says as it warns of the potential dangers of repeat reinfection

Replies
7
Views
239
Off Topic
obfuscating
obfuscating
RicoSuave102954

Study finds the true cost of owning an electric vehicle equates to $17 per gallon

Replies
25
Views
522
Off Topic
Torg
Torg
Morrison71

Cancer, heart disease and autoimmune disease vaccines will be 'ready by end of the decade'

Replies
18
Views
526
Off Topic
SB_SB
S
cigaretteman

Experts slam Florida surgeon general’s warning on coronavirus vaccines

Replies
7
Views
417
Off Topic
Hawk and Awe
H
cigaretteman

Fact Checking MMM: Does science support mask use on planes?

Replies
14
Views
508
Off Topic
Crafty Beaver
C
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back