Scientists Destroy 99% of Cancer Cells in Lab Using Vibrating Molecules

[Phenomenally Frantastic]

Scientists Destroy 99% of Cancer Cells in Lab Using Vibrating Molecules

Scientists have discovered a remarkable way to destroy cancer cells.

www.sciencealert.com

“Scientists have discovered a remarkable way to destroy cancer cells. A study published last year found stimulating aminocyanine molecules with near-infrared light caused them to vibrate in sync, enough to break apart the membranes of cancer cells.

"What needs to be highlighted is that we've discovered another explanation for how these molecules can work," said chemist Ciceron Ayala-Orozco from Rice University.

"This is the first time a molecular plasmon is utilized in this way to excite the whole molecule and to actually produce mechanical action used to achieve a particular goal – in this case, tearing apart cancer cells' membrane."

 

[goldmom]

Shake, rattle and roll to a cure?

 

[Bonerfarts]

The problem never has been killing cancer cells, the problem is not killing the healthy cells along with the bad. Bleach will kill cancer cells, you just don't want to inject that into your veins.

 

[hydro2.0]

New scientific discoveries are cool as ****

 

[jamesvanderwulf]

Can @GOHOX69 verify this…

 

[The Tradition]

New scientific discoveries are cool as ****

But it'll take 10 years of testing before this method is approved to treat people, if ever.

 

[hawkjt]

F cancer!

I do not know if this is as a result of President Biden's moonshot program to beat cancer but we need to keep funding this research.
Hope President Trump and the new Congress will get on board.

Should not be political.
Cancer does not discriminate.
Keep pushing.
Holy grail is out there.
I lost a beloved sister to glioblastoma 6 weeks ago.
Absolutely sucks.

 

[MichaelKeller99]

F cancer!

I do not know if this is as a result of President Biden's moonshot program to beat cancer but we need to keep funding this research.
Hope President Trump and the new Congress will get on board.

Should not be political.
Cancer does not discriminate.
Keep pushing.
Holy grail is out there.
I lost a beloved sister to glioblastoma 6 weeks ago.
Absolutely sucks.

Sorry for your loss. After 50 years, it’s obvious the ‘War on Cancer’ being officially waged in the US has been a complete failure. Just lost a very good friend (in his 30’s) to glioblastoma as well; father to four children.

The ‘cut, burn and poison’ approach doesn’t work. This doctor’s approach to treating it as a metabolic disease makes more sense.

Press-Pulse Protocol | Hippocrates Research

www.hippocratesresearchfoundation.org

https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-024-03775-4

 

[Chuck C]

First they have to figure out how to charge a million dollars per procedure. Then they have to dial it back some, so it doesn’t work too well, so the patient will need multiple procedures.

 

[hawkjt]

Sorry for your loss. After 50 years, it’s obvious the ‘War on Cancer’ being officially waged in the US has been a complete failure. Just lost a very good friend (in his 30’s) to glioblastoma as well; father to four children.

The ‘cut, burn and poison’ approach doesn’t work. This doctor’s approach to treating it as a metabolic disease makes more sense.

Press-Pulse Protocol | Hippocrates Research

www.hippocratesresearchfoundation.org

https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-024-03775-4

Thanks. Whatever approach works, I am all in!

 

[HawkOptimist]

First they have to figure out how to charge a million dollars per procedure. Then they have to dial it back some, so it doesn’t work too well, so the patient will need multiple procedures.

Yep. In 100 years our kids’ kids’ kids will be hearing reports about possible “new” drugs or treatments or procedures that kill and cure cancer. Meanwhile, millions of people will continue to die from it after throwing millions of dollars at treatments after throwing millions of dollars at organizations who claim to be throwing millions of dollars at coming up with a cure.

Really though, I know things have come a long way over the years in the fight against cancer, but I also know some scum bags are getting rich off all of it. F them, and F cancer.

 

[Rifler]

Scientists destroy 100% of cancer cells using fire,.. lengthy clinical trial process anticipated.

 

[goldmom]

My DIL works for a large oncology practice with offices throughout Florida.
She’s the coordinator of palliative care/hospice services, and she has been consistent in saying that while cancer has not been “cured” the greatest advances have been in extending the lives of those living with the disease. I guess that adds some credence to the idea of the ongoing treatments and therapies?
I do know of some who are living 7-8 years with the disease and they have a decent quality of life.

 

[GOHOX69]

Can @GOHOX69 verify this…

Acoustic tech has been tried before. Tumors are clever and ever evolving.

 

[Hawk-A-Doodle-Doo]

Something something OP's mom something something science.

 

[HawkMachine]

After 50 years, it’s obvious the ‘War on Cancer’ being officially waged in the US has been a complete failure.

Don't be stupid.

Is there a 100% cure?

No.

Has there been significant advancement?

Absolutely!

Your comment is incorrect and stupid.

 

[Aardvark86]

Yep. In 100 years our kids’ kids’ kids will be hearing reports about possible “new” drugs or treatments or procedures that kill and cure cancer. Meanwhile, millions of people will continue to die from it after throwing millions of dollars at treatments after throwing millions of dollars at organizations who claim to be throwing millions of dollars at coming up with a cure.

Really though, I know things have come a long way over the years in the fight against cancer, but I also know some scum bags are getting rich off all of it. F them, and F cancer.

I’d prefer we work on the war on dementia at this point

 

[MichaelKeller99]

Don't be stupid.

Is there a 100% cure?

No.

Has there been significant advancement?

Absolutely!

Your comment is incorrect and stupid.

The ‘war’ was over before it started. Just another way for congress to funnel hundreds of billion$ into the pharmaceutical industry.

The 50-Year War on Cancer Revisited: Should We Continue to Fight the Enemy Within? - PMC

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Ferentz_Fan]

So JB did it?

 

[denmar81]

Too much in profits in cancer research. Never will be a cure.

 

[Doodads and Hoohah]

I’d prefer we work on the war on dementia at this point

Kinda agree. Cancer sucks but dementia just turns people into a shell of themselves. Sometimes for decades.

 

[GOHOX69]

I’d prefer we work on the war on dementia at this point

We are. I do it daily.
@jamesvanderwulf and any others in the corridor, including @torbee will give you date of open house. Come visit and eat hyvee catering haha.

 

[BioHawk]

Cool. I'll get excited if this becomes a practical treatment for people.

Microwaving tumors is awesome though.

 

[GOHOX69]

Cool. I'll get excited if this becomes a practical treatment for people.

Microwaving tumors is awesome though.

You can do many many things. They are very very resilient. Cancer stem cells are hard to isolate and tougher to get rid off.

 

[LuciousBDragon]

OP’s Mom kills her clit with her vibrator every night.

 

[Aardvark86]

Kinda agree. Cancer sucks but dementia just turns people into a shell of themselves. Sometimes for decades.

And cancer therapy saves them for that

 

[ICWestfan]

We are. I do it daily.
@jamesvanderwulf and any others in the corridor, including @torbee will give you date of open house. Come visit and eat hyvee catering haha.

Does that include patients (family members) with Parkinsons? Asking for a friend.

 

[goldmom]

You can do many many things. They are very very resilient. Cancer stem cells are hard to isolate and tougher to get rid off.

In the meantime do our best to live a healthy lifestyle and hope we got lucky with the health genes? ☹️

 

[goldmom]

Does that include patients (family members) with Parkinsons? Asking for a friend.

23 and Me told me I am not likely to get Parkinson’s but my brother has it. So sad, He was a scratch golfer.

 

[the24fan]

My DIL works for a large oncology practice with offices throughout Florida.
She’s the coordinator of palliative care/hospice services, and she has been consistent in saying that while cancer has not been “cured” the greatest advances have been in extending the lives of those living with the disease. I guess that adds some credence to the idea of the ongoing treatments and therapies?
I do know of some who are living 7-8 years with the disease and they have a decent quality of life.

Of course. Big Pharma wants to keep people alive longer. Keep patients spending that money on cancer drugs. No chance in hell they ever get to a real “cure”.
The health care industry collapses in that scenario.

 

[Bonerfarts]

Too much in profits in cancer research. Never will be a cure.

Wouldn’t finding the cure produce the most profits?

 

[the24fan]

Wouldn’t finding the cure produce the most profits?

No.
Keep em on that string using chemo drugs, other treatments, that’s where the big money is.

 

[GOHOX69]

Does that include patients (family members) with Parkinsons? Asking for a friend.

Yes it does. Lewy body dementia usually has a Parkinsonian component and vice versa. I wish your folks the very best.

 

[GOHOX69]

Wouldn’t finding the cure produce the most profits?

Correct. But you think you're going to find common sense on here?

 

[MichaelKeller99]

No.
Keep em on that string using chemo drugs, other treatments, that’s where the big money is.

Let’s assume some Pharma company discovered a sure-fire cancer cure for a cost of $50,000. They’d stand to make a ton of money.

But not as much as they’d make keeping a cancer patient alive for 5-6 years on a $60,000/yr chemo/radiation protocol.

🤷‍♂️

 

[GOHOX69]

Let’s assume some Pharma company discovered a sure-fire cancer cure for a cost of $50,000. They’d stand to make a ton of money.

But not as much as they’d make keeping a cancer patient alive for 5-6 years on a $60,000/yr chemo/radiation protocol.

🤷‍♂️

You're going to find a cure for 50k huh? You really are an idiot.

 

[thewop]

First they have to figure out how to charge a million dollars per procedure. Then they have to dial it back some, so it doesn’t work too well, so the patient will need multiple procedures.

Pretty much this... They sunk a LOT of money into R&D for those pricey cancer meds, and the ROI isn't going to be there if they cure the disease...

 

[the24fan]

You're going to find a cure for 50k huh? You really are an idiot.

No but I get the gist of what he’s saying.
He’s not wrong. Keep stringing them along. Treat em don’t cure em. Healthy , cured people don’t make any money.

 

[PoopandBoogers]

Acoustic tech has been tried before. Tumors are clever and ever evolving.

Have you heard anything on the next generation cellular freqs (6g) being used to treat alzheimers/dementia with the mill/tera radio waves to stimulate/ re-activate dormant or decayed brain functions?

 

[MichaelKeller99]

You're going to find a cure for 50k huh? You really are an idiot.

According to the ‘experts’, the cost of bringing a new drug to market is $880 million (https://www.drugs.com/news/mean-cos...SDAY, July 2, 2024 --,28 in JAMA Network Open.)

Also, according to the ‘experts’, over 2,000,000 Americans are expected to be diagnosed with cancer this year (https://www.ons.org/publications-re...sing throughout,Cancer Facts and Figures 2024.)

If Big Pharma found a sure-fire cure for cancer and and wouldn’t dare think of charging less than $50,000/patient for something that cost them $440 I guess that tells us everything we need to know about them.