ADVERTISEMENT

Scott Walker Says Ultrasounds Are 'Just A Cool Thing'

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,354
62,363
113
Republican Scott Walker dismissed any controversy over a law he signed in Wisconsin requiring women seeking abortions to get an ultrasound, referring to ultrasounds in an interview on a conservative radio show as "just a cool thing out there."

The Wisconsin governor, who is likely running for president and leading in early state polls, spoke about a range of issues Friday on The Dana Show, including immigration, the economy and education. About 15 minutes in, host Dana Loesch asked, "What place do you think social issues have in 2016? And why do you think so many Republican candidates are scared of them? Are they scared to embrace them; they're scared to get trapped by the media?"

"Well, I think a little bit of it is the media is a 'gotcha,' some do at least, I don't want to say universally," he said. Then he continued:

"I'll give you an example. I'm pro-life, I've passed pro-life legislation. We defunded Planned Parenthood, we signed a law that requires an ultrasound. Which, the thing about that, the media tried to make that sound like that was a crazy idea. Most people I talk to, whether they're pro-life or not, I find people all the time who'll get out their iPhone and show me a picture of their grandkids' ultrasound and how excited they are, so that's a lovely thing. I think about my sons are 19 and 20, you know we still have their first ultrasound picture. It's just a cool thing out there.

"We just knew if we signed that law, if we provided the information, that more people if they saw that unborn child would, would make a decision to protect and keep the life of that unborn child."

Walker added that issues like abortion "shouldn't be the only thing" conservatives focus on. "We should make sure that people know us for fiscal and economic strengths as well," he said.

But, he continued:

"It certainly is a part of who we are and we shouldn't be afraid to talk about it, and we shouldn't be afraid to push back. When you think about Hillary Clinton, and you think about some others on the left, you say, I think it's reasonable, whether you're pro-life or not to say that taxpayers' dollars shouldn't be spent to support abortion or abortion-related activities. Most Americans believe in that. There are many candidates on the left who don't share that belief."

Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards responded to Walker's comments in a statement Wednesday saying: "Women are very clear that forced government ultrasounds are not 'cool.'" Richards called Walker's statement "appalling" and added "the real problem is the record behind his words."

Abortion rights were also in the news Wednesday because a federal appeals court struck down an Arkansas law banning abortion after 12 weeks. That law was considered one of the most restrictive in the country.

You can listen to the audio of Walker's interview on The Dana Show here.

http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallp...walker-says-ultrasounds-are-just-a-cool-thing
 
The media and their gotchas of trying to get your beliefs on social issues on record. How dare them.
 
Walker once again proves that he has the pulse on what's trendy. And we all know that there's nothing more trendy than abortions. I just hope Walker had on his fedora hat and skinny jeans when he said this.
 
Walker once again proves that he has the pulse on what's trendy. And we all know that there's nothing more trendy than abortions. I just hope Walker had on his fedora hat and skinny jeans when he said this.
His comment was taken out of context, he wasn't saying mandated ultrasound would be cool, he was starting his experience with it and the dude from talking points took it and ran with it. Thinks get twisted by the left and right
 
His comment was taken out of context, he wasn't saying mandated ultrasound would be cool, he was starting his experience with it and the dude from talking points took it and ran with it. Thinks get twisted by the left and right
That may be so. But typically when you're discussing anything related to abortion, you avoid saying, "It's cool." Very unwise choice of words.
 
That may be so. But typically when you're discussing anything related to abortion, you avoid saying, "It's cool." Very unwise choice of words.
Unless your describing your experience with ultrasound, getting to see your kid for the first time. Was it a bad thing to say, maybe, only because hacks run with it in a way it wasn't meant.
 
Unless your describing your experience with ultrasound, getting to see your kid for the first time. Was it a bad thing to say, maybe, only because hacks run with it in a way it wasn't meant.
Please. Walker was clearly trying to justify forced ultrasounds by saying they were cool. For chrissake, he said the cool comment in the same breath as force ultrasounds.
 
No matter what side of the aisle you're on, everyone can agree that getting an abortion is not a happy moment. So why is Walker trying to act like it can be? I mean he literally used the words "lovely" and "excited" in his statement. It was an incredibly foolish argument to make.
 
No matter what side of the aisle you're on, everyone can agree that getting an abortion is not a happy moment. So why is Walker trying to act like it can be? I mean he literally used the words "lovely" and "excited" in his statement. It was an incredibly foolish argument to make.

Now you were making a clear and correct interpretation up to this point.

He wasn't calling abortions "lovely" and "exciting", he was referring to seeing the image of a baby through Ultrasound as "lovely" and "exciting".

I do agree with you that he was trying to soften the big government aspects of a bad bill.
 
Please. Walker was clearly trying to justify forced ultrasounds by saying they were cool. For chrissake, he said the cool comment in the same breath as force ultrasounds.
My understanding is that the law doesn't require anybody to have an ultrasound if they don't want to have an ultrasound, just like the law doesn't require anybody to have their vision checked if they don't want to. If you don't want to undergo the procedure, don't have an abortion in Wisconsin or get a driver's license.
 
Hell, why stop at ultrasounds? Why not make it law that shock therapy must be done also.

How about if you want to worship at a Mosque you must leave Wisconsin too. That would be some terrific conservative pandering there.
 
Scott Walker is just another big government Republican seeking tell every American how to run their lives. Vaginal probes should be welcomed with open legs by every American woman. Waiting periods to buy a gun? We can't have that.
 
Nothing about a getting an ultrasound precludes someone from then getting an abortion. I think that women should have all the information possible before making such a big decision. Does anyone here really think women shouldn't have all the information possible before making this decision?

There has to be a middle ground, and I think there is, between the two extremes in this particular debate.

Religion has nothing to do with it in my case. My ultimate goal is to have it be safe and rare. I think we are pretty close to the safe part, but we have a long way to go on the rare part.
 
Nothing about a getting an ultrasound precludes someone from then getting an abortion. I think that women should have all the information possible before making such a big decision. Does anyone here really think women shouldn't have all the information possible before making this decision?

Gee, I don't know. Let's ask them.

Your opinion here, as it is on most things, is completely fvcking worthless.

And how does showing them an ultrasound give them any kind of additional information? They already know that they're pregnant, nimrod.
 
My understanding is that the law doesn't require anybody to have an ultrasound if they don't want to have an ultrasound, just like the law doesn't require anybody to have their vision checked if they don't want to. If you don't want to undergo the procedure, don't have an abortion in Wisconsin or get a driver's license.
The article clearly states that any woman wanting an abortion would be required to get an ultrasound first. This doesn't sound optional.
 
The article clearly states that any woman wanting an abortion would be required to get an ultrasound first. This doesn't sound optional.

He was deliberately being a dumbass. He was pointing out that the ultrasound is only required when you make the voluntary decision to get an abortion. Just like if you don't want an eye test, don't try and get a driver's license.
 
DaCoach-

Calling me Nimrod seems a bit strong. I am trying to have a discussion on the board devoid of emotion which seems to run all too high on each side of this debate.

Not sure if you are serious or not in your remarks? I can tell you from personal experience that seeing my first child's ultrasound really brought home the utter reality of the situation. It was no longer an abstract "Hey my wife is pregnant" type of deal.

We are talking about two lives being affected here - the mother and the child. If a woman sees the ultrasound and still wants to kill the fetus/baby/whatever I have no rpoblem with her making that decision. Why go into a procedure like that without all of the facts?
 
Pretty simple actually. The abstract becomes real. Seeing is believing. Having more information certainly isn't going to stop someone from having an abortion that wants one. Simply can't see why having a patient view an ultrasound is a bad idea.

I am not for unfettered abortions until birth and neither am I in favor of making abortion illegal. There has to be a middle ground for the majority of us. Basically each side needs to give a little.

The debate sucks way to much oxygen away from other more important topics in my opinion. Simple as that for me.
 
Pretty simple actually. The abstract becomes real. Seeing is believing. Having more information certainly isn't going to stop someone from having an abortion that wants one. Simply can't see why having a patient view an ultrasound is a bad idea.

I am not for unfettered abortions until birth and neither am I in favor of making abortion illegal. There has to be a middle ground for the majority of us. Basically each side needs to give a little.

The debate sucks way to much oxygen away from other more important topics in my opinion. Simple as that for me.

You need to grab a dictionary and look up the terms "emotion" and "fact", as you quite clearly have the two confused here.

You are not a smart person.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT