I've been saying for a long time thatChristian Taliban.
MAGA is Taliban
Taliban is MAGA
Glad to see others are finally getting it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've been saying for a long time thatChristian Taliban.
Libertarianism is a mental health disorderThis decision literally overturns two decisions that were legislating from the bench. This decision is the opposite of legislating from the bench because it sends the legislation back to actual legislative bodies. This decision is littered with references as to why courts aren't the proper place to decide things like when life is viable.
The SCOTUS isn't telling women what they can or can't do with their bodies. You won't find anything in this opinion that does that. The SCOTUS is saying it's a legislative matter. Roe and Casey actually did tell a woman what they can do with their bodies. Roe and Casey both have tests for when an abortion can happen. That's the very essence of legislating from the bench.
As for being Libertarian, the entire philosophy is to do whatever I want as long as I don't harm, or cause proximate harm, to someone else. Let that sink in. I don't know when a fetus becomes a person, and that's why I've never taken a strict position on abortion. I do know a fetus is viable well before it's born. At some point, abortion is causing harm to another person. I don't know when that is. My view on this is absolutely libertarian.
As long as you jump to conclusions without reading court opinions, or otherwise educating yourself, you will always be at odds with me. I really don't care what names you call me. First, it's just a message board. Second, there are a lot of message board tough guys.
When it comes to opinions, you can be right and I can be wrong. Some things aren't really opinions though. You threw out a term, I simply asked a question. Instead of getting an answer, you resorted to insults. Again, I don't care. I was trying to understand your perspective, but insulting me is never going to do that.
You are the last person who should be making that kind of judgement.Libertarianism is a mental health disorder
One of the last people I want to take any advice from here is you based on endless examples here.You are the last person who should be making that kind of judgement.
Good. Great actually. I would hate to be lumped with all the stupid bloggers and tweeters who you take advice from.One of the last people I want to take any advice from here is you based on endless examples here.
The fourth amendment guarantees a right to privacy. The Supreme Court didn't legislate, they guaranteed a right that already existed in the Bill of Rights that states were not providing to their citizens. This Supreme Court just decided to say that right no longer exists. One of those decisions guaranteed a right that was there, this recent one decided to take that right away. The second is definitely legislating, the first is ensuring a right is enforced. And just wait until this court takes away contraception and being able to love whoever you want. Oh, I know, they aren't actually "doing it", they are just giving permission.This decision literally overturns two decisions that were legislating from the bench. This decision is the opposite of legislating from the bench because it sends the legislation back to actual legislative bodies. This decision is littered with references as to why courts aren't the proper place to decide things like when life is viable.
The SCOTUS isn't telling women what they can or can't do with their bodies. You won't find anything in this opinion that does that. The SCOTUS is saying it's a legislative matter. Roe and Casey actually did tell a woman what they can do with their bodies. Roe and Casey both have tests for when an abortion can happen. That's the very essence of legislating from the bench.
If you can't understand how being anti-women's rights flies in the face of calling yourself a libertarian then there is no hope for you. You wrote, "the entire philosophy is to do whatever I want as long as I don't harm, or cause proximate harm, to someone else". So, evidently you don't think women qualify as someone else because this decision most definitely harms them.As for being Libertarian, the entire philosophy is to do whatever I want as long as I don't harm, or cause proximate harm, to someone else. Let that sink in. I don't know when a fetus becomes a person, and that's why I've never taken a strict position on abortion. I do know a fetus is viable well before it's born. At some point, abortion is causing harm to another person. I don't know when that is. My view on this is absolutely libertarian.
As long as you jump to conclusions without reading court opinions, or otherwise educating yourself, you will always be at odds with me. I really don't care what names you call me. First, it's just a message board. Second, there are a lot of message board tough guys.
When it comes to opinions, you can be right and I can be wrong. Some things aren't really opinions though. You threw out a term, I simply asked a question. Instead of getting an answer, you resorted to insults. Again, I don't care. I was trying to understand your perspective, but insulting me is never going to do that.
You can't understand simple concepts. You clearly haven't read Roe, Casey, or Dodd.The fourth amendment guarantees a right to privacy. The Supreme Court didn't legislate, they guaranteed a right that already existed in the Bill of Rights that states were not providing to their citizens. This Supreme Court just decided to say that right no longer exists. One of those decisions guaranteed a right that was there, this recent one decided to take that right away. The second is definitely legislating, the first is ensuring a right is enforced. And just wait until this court takes away contraception and being able to love whoever you want. Oh, I know, they aren't actually "doing it", they are just giving permission.
If you can't understand how being anti-women's rights flies in the face of calling yourself a libertarian then there is no hope for you. You wrote, "the entire philosophy is to do whatever I want as long as I don't harm, or cause proximate harm, to someone else". So, evidently you don't think women qualify as someone else because this decision most definitely harms them.
And finally, I never insulted you. I said you were acting like a literal dunce. I didn't say you were one. If you feel that accurately describes yourself, then so be it. By the way, it wasn't even meant to be an insult, it was meant to describe someone who is using the letter of the law to defeat the spirit of the law in a nonsensical way. Honestly, I don't know how anyone can call themselves a libertarian and also say women shouldn't get to make decisions over their own body.
It's not a mental health disorder. Like communism, it's something that sounds really good on paper but doesn't actually work in practice.Libertarianism is a mental health disorder
No. He’s consistently right. You’re consistently wrong.You are the last person who should be making that kind of judgement.
Because your definition of life isn't a definition that is agreed to by everyone. It is a religiously based definition, one that does not come from the Bible, by the way, and you are trying to force it on other people. So now you are violating two rights of others with this ruling.You can't understand simple concepts. You clearly haven't read Roe, Casey, or Dodd.
I'll say it one more time, the libertarian philosophy is that my rights end when they cause harm to another. At some point a fetus is another person. That's an extremely simple concept. Why don't you focus on those things instead of trying to create your own definitions.
That's the point it's laughable and so many still try and operate on it. Lots of our current whys as well.It's not a mental health disorder. Like communism, it's something that sounds really good on paper but doesn't actually work in practice.
Yeah. Libertarian sounds more sophisticated than "selfish".That's the point it's laughable and so many still try and operate on it. Lots of our current whys as well.