I think the DOJ at the very least should explain why they went with the warrant instead of a subpoena. Just explain the urgency.
It's up to Trump to publish the warrant....
It's up to Trump to publish the warrant....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
???? it's pretty obvious. They had reason to believe they wouldn't get what they were after with a subpoena.I think the DOJ at the very least should explain why they went with the warrant instead of a subpoena. Just explain the urgency.
It's up to Trump to publish the warrant....
I admit I am out over my skis on this area is the law, but I imagine it has to do with not jeopardizing an ongoing investigation.I think the DOJ at the very least should explain why they went with the warrant instead of a subpoena. Just explain the urgency.
It's up to Trump to publish the warrant....
Trump and associates have moved to quash any and all subpoenas served them. Why repeat the same dog and pony show????? it's pretty obvious. They had reason to believe they wouldn't get what they were after with a subpoena.
The previous documents he turned over were from subpoenas. It'd just be nice if they explained why they went with a warrant.Trump and associates have moved to quash any and all subpoenas served them. Why repeat the same dog and pony show?
Well, then the DOJ should say that....a little clarity would be nice. Way too much speculation on the subject right now.I admit I am out over my skis on this area is the law, but I imagine it has to do with not jeopardizing an ongoing investigation.
Honestly, do you think the 35% and their enablers would accept even the most reasonable expectation?Well, then the DOJ should say that....a little clarity would be nice. Way too much speculation on the subject right now.
No....doesn't matter. Never going to reach them....Honestly, do you think the 35% and their enablers would accept even the most reasonable expectation?
He has fought subpoenas and not complied with them. That's reason enough to believe he would do it again.The previous documents he turned over were from subpoenas. It'd just be nice if they explained why they went with a warrant.
Then the DOJ should spell all that out....He has fought subpoenas and not complied with them. That's reason enough to believe he would do it again.
He's also destroyed documents - another reason to use a warrant.
Why? It's obvious. And any "explanation" would be twisted, no reason to say anything.Then the DOJ should spell all that out....
I believe most of the 65% are patient and will wait for whatever information the authorities feel they can release. The vast majority of those I've seen wanting explanations now are people who are defending Trump.No....doesn't matter. Never going to reach them....
The other 65% would appreciate the clarity.....well, a portion of that 65%
good grief...Why? It's obvious. And any "explanation" would be twisted, no reason to say anything.
You really do lap up the right wing narrative.
Don't really see a reason they couldn't explain why they went with a warrant.I believe most of the 65% are patient and will wait for whatever information the authorities feel they can release. The vast majority of those I've seen wanting explanations now are people who are defending Trump.
I imagine they may but in their time and not at the demand of others.Don't really see a reason they couldn't explain why they went with a warrant.
...and the ones they came and got were SUPPOSED to have also been turned over.The previous documents he turned over were from subpoenas. It'd just be nice if they explained why they went with a warrant.
They "spelled it out" to a judge, and certainly "up the food chain" at DOJ, probably all the way to Wray and Garland. And all of them were satisfied with it.Then the DOJ should spell all that out....
Ho took The President's Book. He figured it belonged to him.Another Theory:
Given the frantic nature of the search, I am guessing it relates to secret files about the New Mexico UFO sightings back in the early 1950's. ... Either that or it is the real story behind the Kennedy assassination. Perhaps there are some naked pictures of Marilyn Monroe and Judith Exner.
He would have had a right to access that stuff when he was President.
Perhaps it was an original, signed copy of the Steele Dossier complete with pictures of the Russian Prostitutes giving him that treat that everyone is so envious and desirous of for themselves.
Ummm...perhaps to preserve the documents before Trump could flush more down the toilet?I think the DOJ at the very least should explain why they went with the warrant instead of a subpoena. Just explain the urgency.
It's up to Trump to publish the warrant....
I allowed a small group of out of step misfits to get me angry to the point that I was rude to RockyMt. That’s on me.Yikes, you scared me with that comment.
This place is such an odd conglomeration of demographics, background, fields of endeavor, ages, levels of education, and life experiences that already, it almost does not work. Don't make it worse by pulling back.
No biggie. We all take this place too seriously at times. Me included. Hang in there.I allowed a small group of out of step misfits to get me angry to the point that I was rude to RockyMt. That’s on me.
I have a lot on my mind at the moment and I’m not at my best.
Speculation. I'd like to hear it from the DOJ.Ummm...perhaps to preserve the documents before Trump could flush more down the toilet?
What's most interesting is that "out-of-step misfits" don't recognize that's what they are.I allowed a small group of out of step misfits to get me angry to the point that I was rude to RockyMt.