Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Golf club bag can hold q
Better talk to France then about taking care of vehicle deaths and knives - seems to be a constant there.
If someone wants to cause harm (tim mcveigh) they will and no law, restriction, regulation, etc will stop them.
Of course they will, but I will take my chance keeping trucks and knives out there. Anyone who says those things are comparable to the purpose and effectiveness of an automatic weapon is a complete idiot.
He's special.
Again - if someone wants to cause harm, they will. Whether it be with a semi-automatic rifle, rice cooker or a load of fertilizer. Laws only apply to those that follow them.Of course they will, but I will take my chance keeping trucks and knives out there. Anyone who says those things are comparable to the purpose and effectiveness of an automatic weapon is a complete idiot.
what does all this have to do with trump offering warm condolences?He wanted to offer "warm condolences" before the bodies got cold....
They just go get a truck and ram it into a crowd of Innocents. Then what? Frankly, I'm surprised that isn't a more favorable option.No, but you might be able to do something to limit the extent of the harm such a person can inflict.
The speed, pattern and inconsistent rate of gunfire heard in videos of the Las Vegas shooting indicate the suspect could have used cheap and legal modification devices to accelerate the firing of a semi-automatic weaponVan: Also gets you places.
Knife: Also cuts food, wood, and other things.
Automatic weapon: umm...looks pretty badass hanging on a wall.
Again - if someone wants to cause harm, they will. Whether it be with a semi-automatic rifle, rice cooker or a load of fertilizer. Laws only apply to those that follow them.
The speed, pattern and inconsistent rate of gunfire heard in videos of the Las Vegas shooting indicate the suspect could have used cheap and legal modification devices to accelerate the firing of a semi-automatic weapon
Now - you can modify a van to be a bomb and kills hundreds,
you can include knives in a rice cooker as shrapnel, you can shoot many people with a semi-auto.
If someone wants to cause harm, they will find a way. He planned this out, much like TM planned out the bombing. No one suspected or knew until afterwards.
The speed, pattern and inconsistent rate of gunfire heard in videos of the Las Vegas shooting indicate the suspect could have used cheap and legal modification devices to accelerate the firing of a semi-automatic weapon
Now - you can modify a van to be a bomb and kills hundreds,
you can include knives in a rice cooker as shrapnel, you can shoot many people with a semi-auto.
If someone wants to cause harm, they will find a way. He planned this out, much like TM planned out the bombing. No one suspected or knew until afterwards.
They just go get a truck and ram it into a crowd of Innocents. Then what? Frankly, I'm surprised that isn't a more favorable option.
I'm sorry but I am not of the opinion that 3 senseless death are somehow less appalling than 50. That's insulting to the 3 dead people.
I'm perfectly fine with discussing options as long as people realize that 300 million (est) cats are already out of the bag.
You can't put the genie back in the bottle and you can't stop crazy people from doing crazy shit.
Really what is the only purpose for weapon? If guns only have one purpose and vans are the multi-tool, which is responsible for killing more people in the US?Once again, completely missing the point of my post (hint: the specifics are irrelevant).
You can't compare somebody using a vehicle as a weapon to a gun. Vehicles have other uses other than killing people. Guns, well, they have one purpose.
Yep - laws right. What about those that don't follow laws?You're trying hard to justify guns. Time for an adult conversation on guns in this country. Way to easy to get excessive firepower.
Really what is the only purpose for weapon? If guns only have one purpose and vans are the multi-tool, which is responsible for killing more people in the US?
thank god trump didOh God, just stop. The sad thing is our President has surrounded himself with people who use the same level of reasoning as volknut here just used.
It seems people of your intellect are the ones that have been driving the country down the dead end road for the past 8 years. YOu can't answer it because it doesn't fit your narrative, I understand and have empathy for you.Oh God, just stop. The sad thing is our President has surrounded himself with people who use the same level of reasoning as volknut here just used.
A damn site fewer cats in Australia. And Australia is not the United States. I believe in the right to own firearms. I am not one of these people that owns dozens of guns and thousands of rounds of ammo. I don't own an assault rifle. I don't carry a gun. But I'm here to tell you that if they pass a law asking everyone to turn in their guns to the local law enforcement agency, I'm not doing it. I own several guns that are not registered to me, through inheritance or family handing them down.They put the cats back in the bag in Australia. I'm not saying that's what we should do here but you can't say that it isn't possible because it is. We just have to want to do it and be willing to live with the consequences of the steps required to do it.
I am in favor of mental health check up before gun purchase. I would have zero problem with an assault rifle ban. I don't think they serve much purpose.
We actually monitor things like fertilizer now too.Gun laws actually work. Irrefutably. You should talk to Australia, Scotland, and other places that had leaders with spines who weren't bankrolled by the gun lobby. AND, as many here have pointed out. These guns are made to kill. No other way to slice it.
Once again, completely missing the point of my post (hint: the specifics are irrelevant).
You can't compare somebody using a vehicle as a weapon to a gun. Vehicles have other uses other than killing people. Guns, well, they have one purpose.
What's the definition of an "assault rifle"?
I think you missed that guns are also used to hunt animals (you know...for food) and target shooting, both for fun and competition and maybe they are used to defend one's property as well, and probably several other purposes outside of killing people. But you know, liberal logic and all...
"defending one's home" is a synonym for killing people. Hunting can be done with a bolt action rifle.
"defending one's home" is a synonym for killing people. Hunting can be done with a bolt action rifle.
Maybe because I don't care if it went away. But isn't most competitive shooting done with bolt action rifles as well? The stuff in the Olympics is.I noticed you bleeped right by sport shooting there, Sport.
Now you're just being argumentative. It's only effective because of it's ability to kill.Did BioHawk define what type of gun he was speaking of? Nope, didn't think so. He grouped all "guns" into the same category with his statement, which is obviously incorrect.
And defending ones home is a synonym for killing people, it's used to protect my family and my property. I don't have to kill someone with it for it to be effective.
Now you're just being argumentative. It's only effective because of it's ability to kill.
I am in favor of mental health check up before gun purchase. I would have zero problem with an assault rifle ban. I don't think they serve much purpose.
A damn site fewer cats in Australia. And Australia is not the United States. I believe in the right to own firearms. I am not one of these people that owns dozens of guns and thousands of rounds of ammo. I don't own an assault rifle. I don't carry a gun. But I'm here to tell you that if they pass a law asking everyone to turn in their guns to the local law enforcement agency, I'm not doing it. I own several guns that are not registered to me, through inheritance or family handing them down.
if I have that opinion, what do you think the likely hood of the other tens of millions of gun owners is? I think there are millions of gun owners that would rather risk jail than turn over the right. That's just my opinion, however.
It seems people of your intellect are the ones that have been driving the country down the dead end road for the past 8 years. YOu can't answer it because it doesn't fit your narrative, I understand and have empathy for you.
Do guns kill people, yes. Will banning them stop it, no. You will ALWAYS have people doing stupid shit bio.
Did BioHawk define what type of gun he was speaking of? Nope, didn't think so. He grouped all "guns" into the same category with his statement, which is obviously incorrect.
And defending ones home is a synonym for killing people, it's used to protect my family and my property. I don't have to kill someone with it for it to be effective.
I'm sorry. I'm not familiar with the gun that helps clean your driveway or the version that can change the channel on your TV. Guns have one purpose, that is to kill things. It does not matter what kind of gun it is.
It seems people of your intellect are the ones that have been driving the country down the dead end road for the past 8 years. YOu can't answer it because it doesn't fit your narrative, I understand and have empathy for you.
Do guns kill people, yes. Will banning them stop it, no. You will ALWAYS have people doing stupid shit bio.
lol, again, argumentative. Guns are not designed "to wound."Or wound.
And again, BioHawk said gun, not "assault rifle" which is 95% of the time the incorrect verbiage to use when describing a firearm