Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ACCWhy would BC and ND be a package deal. Neither of those 2 schools signed the Mandatum which means they arent affiliated with the official Catholic Church. Neother of those 2 schools have any affiliation with each other whatsoever.
Not sure why you keep saying that. BC is on nobody’s list.If ND wants 'em for some reason, ND gets 'em.
You may get to watch Iowa State there, but not the Hawks unless a bowl game.Please asu for selfish reasons
If it’s on ND’s list then it’s on Warrens list.Not sure why you keep saying that. BC is on nobody’s list.
That I hear makes a positive.SO, would negative Zilch, be the dreaded double negative?
if you already have the big 3 markets, adding anybody would be negative in that regardsCompared to the projected B1G payouts, adding Colorado and ASU would reduce the payouts.
So, yes, negative value.
if you already have the big 3 markets, adding anybody would be negative in that regards
I think it's still zero based on my mathSO, would negative Zilch, be the dreaded double negative?
Agreed. Negative zilch would be -0. Then there is positive zilch which would be +0. Both come out to be zero. So, in the spirit of removing negativity from this world...could we just say that Zona and Colorado would add positive zilch to the Big Ten?I think it's still zero based on my math
Stanford and Cal are both extremely prestigious universities - incredible academic programs, histories of Nobel prize winners, etc. Just from that perspective they would bring academic legitimacy to the conference. The SEC has nothing like this beyond Vanderbilt. It would further separate the 2 in that aspect.So does Stanford and Cal.