ADVERTISEMENT

SIAP: Sagarin gets it right......IOWA in Top 20

IowaNiceHawk

HR Legend
Gold Member
May 2, 2016
10,077
6,603
113
62
St Donatus, IA
1 Alabama A = 1
2 Ohio State A = 2 | 97.83 3
3 Georgia A = 96.70 13 2 77.87( 6) 3 2 | 4 2 | 95.81 4 | 94.77 6 | 99.22 2
4 Penn State A = 95.65 11 2 74.53( 38) 1 1 | 4 2 | 96.61 3 | 95.22 4 | 94.08 7
5 Clemson A = 95.32 12 2 78.56( 4) 1 1 | 7 1 | 95.11 5 | 95.54 3 | 94.98 6
6 Oklahoma A = 94.31 12 2 77.18( 7) 1 1 | 6 2 | 92.72 7 | 94.95 5 | 96.29 4
7 Wisconsin A = 94.30 13 1 73.78( 47) 0 1 | 4 1 | 93.21 6 | 94.11 7 | 95.79 5
8 Auburn A = 91.45 10 4 79.07( 3) 2 2 | 3 4 | 91.35 9 | 92.44 8 | 90.53 9
9 Washington A = 89.29 10 3 72.33( 57) 0 1 | 0 2 | 91.64 8 | 90.15 9 | 85.51 16
10 Notre Dame A = 88.90 10 3 79.32( 2) 0 1 | 5 3 | 89.06 10 | 88.89 10 | 88.14 11
FINAL College Football 2017 through games of 2018 January 8 Monday - National Championship Game

11 Oklahoma State A = 87.58 10 3 74.76( 35) 0 1 | 3 3 | 88.12 11 | 87.97 11 | 86.07 15
12 TCU A = 87.39 11 3 75.54( 25) 0 2 | 4 3 | 87.03 12 | 87.19 12 | 87.56 12
13 Central Florida(UCF) A = 87.11 13 0 66.44( 72) 1 0 | 1 0 | 84.70 15 | 85.06 16 | 93.60 8
14 Stanford A = 85.79 9 5 76.78( 10) 2 0 | 2 3 | 84.95 14 | 85.60 15 | 86.78 13
15 Southern California A = 85.42 11 3 76.75( 11) 0 2 | 3 2 | 83.20 18 | 86.02 13 | 88.72 10
16 Miami-Florida A = 84.47 10 3 75.94( 22) 1 2 | 3 2 | 83.12 19 | 85.97 14 | 85.34 17
17 Mississippi State A = 84.35 9 4 73.80( 46) 0 3 | 2 3 | 83.96 16 | 83.82 19 | 84.78 19
18 Iowa A = 83.80 8 5 77.93( 5) 1 2 | 2 4 | 83.91 17 | 83.12 22 | 83.51 22
19 LSU A = 83.66 9 4 72.70( 54) 1 2 | 1 3 | 82.94 20 | 84.48 17 | 83.82 21
20 Northwestern A = 83.54 10 3 72.75( 52)
 
Iowa is 18th in the composite rankings as well. I like these ratings better than human polls/committees no matter what the team is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nwhawkincr
Iowa is 18th in the composite rankings as well. I like these ratings better than human polls/committees no matter what the team is.

I like Sagarin, Massey and the others as well. Sagarin had Iowa at 22 in 2015 at the end of the season when Iowa went 12-2. Did you like Sagarin then too? Difference is Iowa played 3 teams in the Sagarin Top 30 in 2015 and 6 in 2017.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IowaNiceHawk
I like Sagarin, Massey and the others as well. Sagarin had Iowa at 22 in 2015 at the end of the season when Iowa went 12-2. Did you like Sagarin then too? Difference is Iowa played 3 teams in the Sagarin Top 30 in 2015 and 6 in 2017.[/zyr

Yes, I liked Sagarin and the composite rankings then too.
 
1 Alabama A = 1
2 Ohio State A = 2 | 97.83 3
3 Georgia A = 96.70 13 2 77.87( 6) 3 2 | 4 2 | 95.81 4 | 94.77 6 | 99.22 2
4 Penn State A = 95.65 11 2 74.53( 38) 1 1 | 4 2 | 96.61 3 | 95.22 4 | 94.08 7
5 Clemson A = 95.32 12 2 78.56( 4) 1 1 | 7 1 | 95.11 5 | 95.54 3 | 94.98 6
6 Oklahoma A = 94.31 12 2 77.18( 7) 1 1 | 6 2 | 92.72 7 | 94.95 5 | 96.29 4
7 Wisconsin A = 94.30 13 1 73.78( 47) 0 1 | 4 1 | 93.21 6 | 94.11 7 | 95.79 5
8 Auburn A = 91.45 10 4 79.07( 3) 2 2 | 3 4 | 91.35 9 | 92.44 8 | 90.53 9
9 Washington A = 89.29 10 3 72.33( 57) 0 1 | 0 2 | 91.64 8 | 90.15 9 | 85.51 16
10 Notre Dame A = 88.90 10 3 79.32( 2) 0 1 | 5 3 | 89.06 10 | 88.89 10 | 88.14 11
FINAL College Football 2017 through games of 2018 January 8 Monday - National Championship Game

11 Oklahoma State A = 87.58 10 3 74.76( 35) 0 1 | 3 3 | 88.12 11 | 87.97 11 | 86.07 15
12 TCU A = 87.39 11 3 75.54( 25) 0 2 | 4 3 | 87.03 12 | 87.19 12 | 87.56 12
13 Central Florida(UCF) A = 87.11 13 0 66.44( 72) 1 0 | 1 0 | 84.70 15 | 85.06 16 | 93.60 8
14 Stanford A = 85.79 9 5 76.78( 10) 2 0 | 2 3 | 84.95 14 | 85.60 15 | 86.78 13
15 Southern California A = 85.42 11 3 76.75( 11) 0 2 | 3 2 | 83.20 18 | 86.02 13 | 88.72 10
16 Miami-Florida A = 84.47 10 3 75.94( 22) 1 2 | 3 2 | 83.12 19 | 85.97 14 | 85.34 17
17 Mississippi State A = 84.35 9 4 73.80( 46) 0 3 | 2 3 | 83.96 16 | 83.82 19 | 84.78 19
18 Iowa A = 83.80 8 5 77.93( 5) 1 2 | 2 4 | 83.91 17 | 83.12 22 | 83.51 22
19 LSU A = 83.66 9 4 72.70( 54) 1 2 | 1 3 | 82.94 20 | 84.48 17 | 83.82 21
20 Northwestern A = 83.54 10 3 72.75( 52)
does that mean crickets bonus for being in the top 20
 
Will this qualify Kirk for another $500,000 bonus and Asst. Coaches with another 8% raise ?
giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: bojihawk44
According to SoS, we got to watch a top 6 schedule in the country. That's good football! Very exciting season and a very competitive team with exciting players to watch. Great Iowa players in Wadley, Jewel, Jackson, Stanley and Fant? So many young up and comers to boot? Man, this was some good stuff. Well worth my 5 season tickets.
 
According to SoS, we got to watch a top 6 schedule in the country. That's good football! Very exciting season and a very competitive team with exciting players to watch. Great Iowa players in Wadley, Jewel, Jackson, Stanley and Fant? So many young up and comers to boot? Man, this was some good stuff. Well worth my 5 season tickets.

The Hockenson and Fant TE duo is going to fun to watch !!

GO HAWKS :)
 
No matter how I spin it, 8-5 doesn't sound like a good season. That should be the minimum. It only feels good to some of you because they finally won a bowl game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uihawks111
Not trying to be a downer, but under .500 in conference is mediocre and not top 20.
Iowa’s season last year was not mediocre at all. Tough schedule. New QB. 40% of the O-line out for the year. It was not a great year, but Vegas had us at 6.5 wins for the year. IMO, we outperformed most expectations and for that, it was not mediocre.
 
No matter how I spin it, 8-5 doesn't sound like a good season. That should be the minimum. It only feels good to some of you because they finally won a bowl game.
Another Fantasy league guy I bet. Couldn't disagree with you more.
 
No matter how I spin it, 8-5 doesn't sound like a good season. That should be the minimum. It only feels good to some of you because they finally won a bowl game.
Maybe you should try watching the games? We were not supposed to win 8 games. We did. In fact, I feel we should have won more. It was a good season.
 
I can see where you kool aid drinkers think the season was a good season. But those of you who think it was a great season are delusional. We lost to Purdue, Northwestern, and Michigan State and Penn State at games end. All these games should have been won and then we can talk great season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uihawks111
I can see where you kool aid drinkers think the season was a good season. But those of you who think it was a great season are delusional. We lost to Purdue, Northwestern, and Michigan State and Penn State at games end. All these games should have been won and then we can talk great season.
I am a kool aid drinker, but I agree with all you have said. Even if we had beaten either Purdue, NW or MSU and gone 9-4, I would still call it a good season and not a great one.
 
I can see where you kool aid drinkers think the season was a good season. But those of you who think it was a great season are delusional. We lost to Purdue, Northwestern, and Michigan State and Penn State at games end. All these games should have been won and then we can talk great season.

Wait, why should all of those games have been won?
 
Iowa’s season last year was not mediocre at all. Tough schedule. New QB. 40% of the O-line out for the year. It was not a great year, but Vegas had us at 6.5 wins for the year. IMO, we outperformed most expectations and for that, it was not mediocre.

I don't think anyone is calling it a great season. Only Clownfans celebrate and 8-5 season.

But, that being said, it was a good season.
Any season that you beat Ohio State and knock them out of the
Playoffs, it's probably a good season
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT