Paywall
But we are attacking the journalists now? LOLHope that dude gets a good bunk at Gitmo.
Gift link for the poor who went to a prestigious private college that remains unnamed:Paywall
For what? They very clearly said yesterday this information was not classified.Hope that dude gets a good bunk at Gitmo.
I know. And you expect Trump and his goons to be on the up and up? He just made them look bad. Here comes Trump justice.For what? They very clearly said yesterday this information was not classified.
This is likely how it will go.I know. And you expect Trump and his goons to be on the up and up? He just made them look bad. Here comes Trump justice.
For what? Defending himself against a bunch of liars trying to slander him? That seems harsh for defending oneself for free speech being attacked by crooks.Hope that dude gets a good bunk at Gitmo.
Post 12For what? Defending himself against a bunch of liars trying to slander him? That seems harsh for defending oneself for free speech being attacked by crooks.
Hope that dude gets a good bunk at Gitmo.
Radiation poisoning?I know. And you expect Trump and his goons to be on the up and up? He just made them look bad. Here comes Trump justice.
True.For what? They very clearly said yesterday this information was not classified.
But the word salads from Kamala are much, much worse. You had no choice but to go Trump again.True.
They compounded the f up exponentially.
The stuff is out now. No need.Radiation poisoning?
“Fall” out of a high-rise window?
Clinton heart-attack gun?
Hack his car computer like that other reporter?
LOL...The Supreme Court. That old thing?He’s 100% fine. I’m sure the delay was for the Atlantic’s attorneys to review.
Supreme Court has said the media is free to publish classified documents they inadvertently receive.
BARTNICKI v. VOPPER
www.law.cornell.edu
WHERE’S HUNTER BIDEN?!?!?There was an awful lot of perjury committed in front of a Congressional committee yesterday.
I’m sure the GOP will hold those lies to account in the proper way.
Classified vs sensitive? They should investigate all involved including the reporter.For what? They very clearly said yesterday this information was not classified.
Because the US government told him is was not classified and because they absolutely threatened this guy and attempted to destroy his credibility.Even though the attack has taken place, I'm curious why the change of course by Goldberg, given that similar attacks could take place in the future.
On Saturday, March 15, Hegseth posted an update and others responded in texts that Goldberg said he would not publish because "the information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Command's area of responsibility."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-goldberg-the-atlantic-trump-officials-group-chat-signal/
@Whiskeydeltadeltatango to our exchange yesterday it sure looks like the journalist got specific details like timing and which aircraft would be performing the attack. That is obviously classified information. Otherwise, as they wrote in their article, an unscrupulous person could have posted all of this to social media then the Houthi bad guys could have moved location or worse they could have attempted an attack on our assets in the region.
We obviously had resources on the ground as they knew that a bad guy had entered his girlfriend’s apartment building. Those resources were in extreme danger if this Goldberg had posted this info in real time (which apparently he could because it “was not classified”).
So Gabbard obviously lied to Congress. Lock her up and fire everyone in that chat. They are a danger to our troops/CIA officers.
Read above. The journalist was well within his rights. He went through extra steps to try to protect American troops who the admin threw under the bus with their reckless use of Signal.Classified vs sensitive? They should investigate all involved including the reporter.
Because the US government told him is was not classified and because they absolutely threatened this guy and attempted to destroy his credibility.
Probably because this band of winners spent the last 24 hours disparaging Goldberg personally, lying to Congress, and going so far as to imply he somehow hacked his way into the chat and Elon was looking into the matter? Seems like that could be a reason why he dumped the messages publicly.Even though the attack has taken place, I'm curious why the change of course by Goldberg, given that similar attacks could take place in the future.
From the article:
On Saturday, March 15, Hegseth posted an update and others responded in texts that Goldberg said he would not publish because "the information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Command's area of responsibility."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-goldberg-the-atlantic-trump-officials-group-chat-signal/
Luckily he wasn't under oath and lied like Tulsi and the other dope did yesterday several times.Even though the attack has taken place, I'm curious why the change of course by Goldberg, given that similar attacks could take place in the future.
From the article:
On Saturday, March 15, Hegseth posted an update and others responded in texts that Goldberg said he would not publish because "the information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Command's area of responsibility."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-goldberg-the-atlantic-trump-officials-group-chat-signal/