ADVERTISEMENT

Signal text chain released

GIF by Giphy QA
 
Sure sounds like we're protecting Saudi oil facilities and shipping lines, but bitching about Europe paying for it.

Shouldn't the Saudis "pay for it"? I mean, we hear constantly from MAGAs that Drill Baby Drill means we have enough US production for ourselves, but we're spending hundreds of billions to keep shipping lines from the ME open. Why is that?

I've stated it dozens of times on here - if we spend the billions on moving away from fossil fuels, we no longer need ANY naval presence in the ME at all. That area becomes a useless sand pit. Instead, we continue bombing and patrolling and spending almost $1T a year on military costs. Eliminate the need to Play Policeman in the ME and whine about "levying that cost to Europe", and we can probably drop that military budget in half.
 
Radiation poisoning?
“Fall” out of a high-rise window?
Clinton heart-attack gun?
Hack his car computer like that other reporter?
The stuff is out now. No need.

There was a meeting last night at the Atlantic that went like this.

Atlantic: Jeffrey, release the text. They said it wasn't classified. You're good.

JG: No effing way. They'll bury me Hoffa style.

Atlantic: We will pay all of your legal fees and dare them to arrest you. You'll go down in history.

JG: You mean like Sacco and Vanzetti? Ahhhh fvck it.
 
Even though the attack has taken place, I'm curious why the change of course by Goldberg, given that similar attacks could take place in the future.

From the article:
On Saturday, March 15, Hegseth posted an update and others responded in texts that Goldberg said he would not publish because "the information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Command's area of responsibility."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-goldberg-the-atlantic-trump-officials-group-chat-signal/
 
@Whiskeydeltadeltatango to our exchange yesterday it sure looks like the journalist got specific details like timing and which aircraft would be performing the attack. That is obviously classified information. Otherwise, as they wrote in their article, an unscrupulous person could have posted all of this to social media then the Houthi bad guys could have moved location or worse they could have attempted an attack on our assets in the region.

We obviously had resources on the ground as they knew that a bad guy had entered his girlfriend’s apartment building. Those resources were in extreme danger if this Goldberg had posted this info in real time (which apparently he could because it “was not classified”).

So Gabbard obviously lied to Congress. Lock her up and fire everyone in that chat. They are a danger to our troops/CIA officers.
 
Even though the attack has taken place, I'm curious why the change of course by Goldberg, given that similar attacks could take place in the future.

On Saturday, March 15, Hegseth posted an update and others responded in texts that Goldberg said he would not publish because "the information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Command's area of responsibility."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-goldberg-the-atlantic-trump-officials-group-chat-signal/
Because the US government told him is was not classified and because they absolutely threatened this guy and attempted to destroy his credibility.
 
@Whiskeydeltadeltatango to our exchange yesterday it sure looks like the journalist got specific details like timing and which aircraft would be performing the attack. That is obviously classified information. Otherwise, as they wrote in their article, an unscrupulous person could have posted all of this to social media then the Houthi bad guys could have moved location or worse they could have attempted an attack on our assets in the region.

We obviously had resources on the ground as they knew that a bad guy had entered his girlfriend’s apartment building. Those resources were in extreme danger if this Goldberg had posted this info in real time (which apparently he could because it “was not classified”).

So Gabbard obviously lied to Congress. Lock her up and fire everyone in that chat. They are a danger to our troops/CIA officers.
 
Classified vs sensitive? They should investigate all involved including the reporter.
Read above. The journalist was well within his rights. He went through extra steps to try to protect American troops who the admin threw under the bus with their reckless use of Signal.

The guy is a Patriot exposing this blatant and illegal incompetence.

But you sure rush to equate the two.
 
A 4-week "archive". This is why they are using the APP in the first place. However, does the app delete the messages or suppress them? Where is the database? Etc etc.

2025-03-26-09-32-19.jpg
 
Last edited:
Even though the attack has taken place, I'm curious why the change of course by Goldberg, given that similar attacks could take place in the future.

From the article:
On Saturday, March 15, Hegseth posted an update and others responded in texts that Goldberg said he would not publish because "the information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Command's area of responsibility."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-goldberg-the-atlantic-trump-officials-group-chat-signal/
Probably because this band of winners spent the last 24 hours disparaging Goldberg personally, lying to Congress, and going so far as to imply he somehow hacked his way into the chat and Elon was looking into the matter? Seems like that could be a reason why he dumped the messages publicly.
 
Even though the attack has taken place, I'm curious why the change of course by Goldberg, given that similar attacks could take place in the future.

From the article:
On Saturday, March 15, Hegseth posted an update and others responded in texts that Goldberg said he would not publish because "the information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Command's area of responsibility."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-goldberg-the-atlantic-trump-officials-group-chat-signal/
Luckily he wasn't under oath and lied like Tulsi and the other dope did yesterday several times.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT