ADVERTISEMENT

So, Hillary did in 2008 what the DNC is accusing Bernie of doing the other day?

Uh oh...

23) Upon information and belief, a similar security incident arose with the NGP VAN software during the 2008 national presidential primaries, resulting in the unintentional transmission of Confidential Information to the campaign of Democratic primary candidate Hillary Clinton (the “Prior Incident”).

http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000151-b72f-d1ae-add5-f76f14db0001

Didn't Richard Nixon do a similar thing? He did it the old fashion way (physically breaking and entering). Is this a double standard? Should Bernie be prosecuted?

2013_07_22%20Nixon_Harper.gif
 
Last edited:
Is this a double standard? Should Bernie be prosecuted?

I don't think so. The Sander's campaign reported a vulnerability in October, and the 'firewalls' coming down to just allow everyone access to everything stinks of a honey pot by the DNC. The Sanders campaign didn't break anything it was more like the doors all opened conveniently, and they stuck their head in.
 
I don't think so. The Sander's campaign reported a vulnerability in October, and the 'firewalls' coming down to just allow everyone access to everything stinks of a honey pot by the DNC. The Sanders campaign didn't break anything it was more like the doors all opened conveniently, and they stuck their head in.
Lost my virginity the same way. If certain people found out then, they would have been pissed too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moral_victory
I don't think so. The Sander's campaign reported a vulnerability in October, and the 'firewalls' coming down to just allow everyone access to everything stinks of a honey pot by the DNC. The Sanders campaign didn't break anything it was more like the doors all opened conveniently, and they stuck their head in.
Oh, so it wasn't breaking and entering.....it was just entering? No harm. The door was unlocked reason. But doesn't it sound like Nixon's claim...."I'm no crook? Bernie is no crook.:rolleyes:
 
Oh, so it wasn't breaking and entering.....it was just entering? No harm. The door was unlocked reason. But doesn't it sound like Nixon's claim...."I'm no crook? Bernie is no crook.:rolleyes:
B.S. The one thing it shows is how invested the national parties are in getting their guys a win. It's no stretch than that the national party is invested in which of their most "electable" candidates get the advantage. This is a set-up. You think Clinton wouldn't/didn't look into another candidates metrics?
 
  • Like
Reactions: moral_victory
Oh, so it wasn't breaking and entering.....it was just entering? No harm. The door was unlocked reason. But doesn't it sound like Nixon's claim...."I'm no crook? Bernie is no crook.:rolleyes:

I'll give you a better opportunity to make a case. Stinks more like a honeypot to me like a said pulled off by the DNC because they know that the Sander's campaign would walk through the open door because they reported it in October. 'Firewall' is such a weird word to use in the case because firewalls don't really separate data in a database, and should have been something more like an application delivery controller if the databases were even separate at all. Otherwise I am going to guess that authentication permissions were broadened?

Smells shady by the vendor and the DNC to me, and I will be curious if any facts ever come out, and I feel like there should be an audit.
 
I'll give you a better opportunity to make a case. Stinks more like a honeypot to me like a said pulled off by the DNC because they know that the Sander's campaign would walk through the open door because they reported it in October. 'Firewall' is such a weird word to use in the case because firewalls don't really separate data in a database, and should have been something more like an application delivery controller if the databases were even separate at all. Otherwise I am going to guess that authentication permissions were broadened?

Smells shady by the vendor and the DNC to me, and I will be curious if any facts ever come out, and I feel like there should be an audit.

Yeah, more hearings on a questionable activity by Democrats would be too much for the nation to bear. They're wearing everyone down. FF (Fraud Fatigue). :(
 
Yeah, more hearings on a questionable activity by Democrats would be too much for the nation to bear. They're wearing everyone down. FF (Fraud Fatigue). :(

Well we shouldn't stop with just Democrats. The whole damn system needs a good audit.
 
New Information Shows DNC Violated Its Own Rules When It Shut Down Sanders Campaign Data Access
Author: Christian Drake December 19, 2015 9:16 am
The DNC appears to have been in such a rush to shut down Bernie Sanders’ campaign, that they violated a few of their own laws according to a lawsuit filed by the campaign against the DNC.

The shutdown came about because of a DNC software security error that allowed one campaign to view another campaign’s proprietary voter data. This is an error that had been reported to the DNC for months by the Sanders campaign but continued to occur. A few Sanders staffers allegedly accessed private data from the Hillary Clinton campaign during a period where the error had been occurring again, and when this was found the DNC immediately locked the Sanders campaign out of their data.

While no one is blameless in this mess, the DNC has handled things extremely poorly, and may have even broke their own guidelines. Here is where the DNC’s problems start. Notes in the lawsuit indicate the DNC violated some of its own rules in its haste to “fix” the problem of the data breach.

It stated that under a contract between the DNC and the Sanders campaign, pertaining to the data system’s use, formal notice in writing is required if either side believes the other has violated the rules on privacy. Additionally, each side is supposed to be allowed 10 days to address any concerns.

“The DNC may not suspend the Campaign’s access to critical Voter Data out of haste or desperation to clean up after the DNC’s own mistakes,” the suit says.

Source: Washington Post

An agreement was reached the same day, very soon after the Sanders campaign announced they filed the lawsuit, for Bernie’s team to regain access to the data on the following morning. As of now, it seems like the massive publicity of this mess has resolved the issue of whether or not Bernie will be able to continue his presidential campaign.

What’s important to know is this: Whether you are for Bernie or Hillary, the fault ultimately is with the DNC and their chosen vendor for not resolving the issue when it was first reported. To make matters worse, the DNC rushed to apply a draconian punishment for the resulting breach. It’s also important to know that the DNC cut off Sanders from his own data, not just from a generic DNC list, essentially taking his campaign’s private data hostage.

The DNC wanted to have people held accountable for misconduct, and while that is fair, will they be applying the same level of punishment to their leadership for the mishandling of this whole fiasco?
 
  • Like
Reactions: moral_victory
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT