ADVERTISEMENT

So, how long until "texting while walking" is outlawed?

The Tradition

HB King
Apr 23, 2002
128,261
102,819
113
An estimated ten percent of pedestrian injuries that land people in emergency rooms are due to distracted walking, a recent study found. That's thousands of people injured -- sometimes killed.

In San Diego, investigators believe Joshua Burwell may have been trying to take a picture of the sunset when he took a fatal fall some 40 feet off Sunset Cliffs.

"He wasn't watching where he was walking and looking more down at the device," said San Diego Lifeguard Sgt. Bill Bender.

It's a tragic example of a growing problem -- people distracted by their phones or other devices. One mall security camera captured a woman focused on her phone walk straight into a fountain.

Another video shows a man talking on his phone walk right off the train platform.

In a recent study, 78 percent of Americans said distracted walking is a serious issue.

Another study found people using their phone while walking veered off course 61 percent of the time, and overshot their target 13 percent more than when they were not distracted by their device.

While the number of emergency room visits for distracted walking injuries doubled between 2005 and 2010 to more than 1,500, Dr. Claudette Lajam, an orthopedic surgeon, believes the problem is actually much bigger.
"A lot of people don't admit that they do it," said Dr. Lajam. "It's getting worse as we have more and more features on these devices that we carry around with us that can distract us."

Researchers at Ohio State found millennials ages 21 to 25 are the most likely to be injured. And the National Safety Council says nearly 80 percent of the injuries stem from falls, estimating more than half occur at home.

For the first time, the National Safety Council is including distracted walking as a category in its annual report on unintentional deaths and injuries.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/dangers-distracted-walking-research-national-safety-council/



This is frightening! Someone needs to dooooo something about this, shouldn't they?
 
There is a big difference between people hurting themselves doing something stupid and people killing other people doing something stupid.

Distracted walking could theoretically but in practice rarely hurts any but the distracted walker.

Distracted driving kills other drivers.

Not only is there a difference between being hurt and being killed but there is also a difference in the capacity to harm other people in what you are doing.
 
Yep. If you die because of something w/ your cell phone, and you're not operating a vehicle when it happens, then I feel like that's just how you're suppose to go. And you're dumb.

Well, we should at least outlaw it until kids are 18. We can't allow children to engage in this dangerous activity until they're mature enough to face the consequences. Why won't we think about the children?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoleSoup4U
I do not doubt there will be some city soon to pass a law against walking and interacting on a mobile device while walking.

Of course it will be for the "safety". Knowing full well it's going to be a cash cow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoachRickVice
Well, we should at least outlaw it until kids are 18. We can't allow children to engage in this dangerous activity until they're mature enough to face the consequences. Why won't we think about the children?

Hell, we should just ban cell phones for all people under 18.
 
I do not doubt there will be some city soon to pass a law against walking and interacting on a mobile device while walking.

Of course it will be for the "safety". Knowing full well it's going to be a cash cow.

Besides of course wearing a freaking seat belt or a helmet on a motorcycle can you point out one of these so called safety overreaches that only protects the safety of the person who might violate that rule and not the safety of you know EVERYONE ELSE ON THE ROAD.

Screw it man I have kids, Car accidents are the #1 killer of pretty much everyone under 40 with maybe a few exceptions. The deadliest place my kids regularly go is in the car and it's made that way not necessarily just because driving a car is inherently dangerous, but it's made that way because people do stupid crap that puts me and my kids in danger. They drink and drive, they text and drive, they drive tired or aggressive. And I think it's pretty darn stupid that the biggest risk to my kid's life is taking them with me to go grocery shopping or some crap like that.

So yeah I want people who put the rest of us in danger to be punished. My kids are way more important to me then someone else's need to shoot out a text while they are traveling down the road.
 
Besides of course wearing a freaking seat belt or a helmet on a motorcycle can you point out one of these so called safety overreaches that only protects the safety of the person who might violate that rule and not the safety of you know EVERYONE ELSE ON THE ROAD.

Drug prohibition.

Prostitution prohibition.

Gambling prohibitions.

I could go on....
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoachRickVice
Besides of course wearing a freaking seat belt or a helmet on a motorcycle can you point out one of these so called safety overreaches that only protects the safety of the person who might violate that rule and not the safety of you know EVERYONE ELSE ON THE ROAD.

Screw it man I have kids, Car accidents are the #1 killer of pretty much everyone under 40 with maybe a few exceptions. The deadliest place my kids regularly go is in the car and it's made that way not necessarily just because driving a car is inherently dangerous, but it's made that way because people do stupid crap that puts me and my kids in danger. They drink and drive, they text and drive, they drive tired or aggressive. And I think it's pretty darn stupid that the biggest risk to my kid's life is taking them with me to go grocery shopping or some crap like that.

So yeah I want people who put the rest of us in danger to be punished. My kids are way more important to me then someone else's need to shoot out a text while they are traveling down the road.

Calm down bud.
 
Drug prohibition.

Prostitution prohibition.

Gambling prohibitions.

I could go on....

Fair enough but I hardly think you can compare texting regulations that have come up only recently and usually involving driving to prohibitions that we put in place decades and even centuries ago.

Also with prostitution and gambling those prohibitions where more of the moralistic nature and less of a safety thing.

Because when you start talking about a prohibition on texting while walking and distracted walking the thing that appears to me that you are complaining about is prohibitions on texting while driving and distracted driving.
 
xdemol17.jpg
 

Fair enough. . . I would say that's an over-reach and the most simple solution is a sign that says anyone sledding sleds at their own risk.

But in my area I really havn't noticed any laws or rules coming out that are like this. So to me it's not even really a problem. I'm not sure if sledding in public parks is legal here or not, I havn't been sledding in a while. When my kids are a little older I will probably check that out.

As far as seatbelts and helmets are concerned, scraping your dead rear off the pavement and cleaning your brains up is a nasty job that costs the city time and money as well as headaches for other drivers. So there is good reason to make you wear a seatbelt and a helmet.
 
As far as seatbelts and helmets are concerned, scraping your dead rear off the pavement and cleaning your brains up is a nasty job that costs the city time and money as well as headaches for other drivers. So there is good reason to make you wear a seatbelt and a helmet.

They could simply pass a law that says if we have to clean your flesh and fluids off the street and you were not wearing safety equipment, the city can bill your estate for the costs.
 
They could simply pass a law that says if we have to clean your flesh and fluids off the street and you were not wearing safety equipment, the city can bill your estate for the costs.

Not everyone has the money to cover for that. Shoot I sort of learned a similar lesson when my wife was involved (not the cause) in a 4 car pile up and 2 out of 3 of the other cars didn't have insurance. Not sure you can rely on those guys to leave an estate with money to clean their remains off the street.

Besides that punishes his family more then it punishes the dead person. That law would go right out the window once it came out that the city just billed the estate that would have gone to a widow that was struggling now to feed her kids thanks to her husband being killed riding a motorcycle bare headed.

I think seatbelts and helmets are reasonable requirements. Now I agree with you the sledding thing is over the top but the main cause of that wasn't because some people wringing their hands at someone maybe getting hurt sledding and more of someone getting hurt sledding and managing to get a ton of money from the city through the courts.

It seems to me that signs and appropriate laws indicating that your choice to sled or swim or do whatever in a public park is at your own risk is a better fix.
 
Not everyone has the money to cover for that. Shoot I sort of learned a similar lesson when my wife was involved (not the cause) in a 4 car pile up and 2 out of 3 of the other cars didn't have insurance. Not sure you can rely on those guys to leave an estate with money to clean their remains off the street.

Besides that punishes his family more then it punishes the dead person. That law would go right out the window once it came out that the city just billed the estate that would have gone to a widow that was struggling now to feed her kids thanks to her husband being killed riding a motorcycle bare headed.

I think seatbelts and helmets are reasonable requirements. Now I agree with you the sledding thing is over the top but the main cause of that wasn't because some people wringing their hands at someone maybe getting hurt sledding and more of someone getting hurt sledding and managing to get a ton of money from the city through the courts.

It seems to me that signs and appropriate laws indicating that your choice to sled or swim or do whatever in a public park is at your own risk is a better fix.

If we're really that worried about money, shouldn't we be looking to curb other, more egregious, spending?
 
Because when you start talking about a prohibition on texting while walking and distracted walking the thing that appears to me that you are complaining about is prohibitions on texting while driving and distracted driving.
That's a stretch. In my post I said nothing about driving. In a college town where you have many pedestrians a walk and text fine would be a cash cow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: herecomethehawkeyes
a few years back I was trying to leave a Target parking lot. I was waiting for the vehicles in the lane that runs by the front of the store. This one chick, with head buried in phone was crossing the lane (she was crossing in the crosswalk). She walks in front of this truck who was doing a rolling stop through the stop sign. He slammed on the brakes and was able to stop before her head splattered against the vehicle. She never looked up and was completely unaware she was less than a foot away from being flattened.

nobody needs to do anything about this. I am tired of protecting people from themselves. I am all for the herd thinning itself out.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT