Originally posted by Flying_Tiger:
I think Brands can really motivate for a single dual and get the guys at a really high level emotionally. That is very hard to do in a three day tournament, especially went your guys are spread out all over the place.Â
Bingo.Originally posted by Chuck C:
I think we have been a solid overall team the last few years. The finishes at the NCAA's has proven this. The problem is that we haven't had that 2-3 very dominant guys that can rack up bonus points and put the team total over the top.
Exactly. I think putting a bit of extra money into individual studs (like Metcalf or a Snyder, Bo Jordan, etc.) is a key to having a tourney championship team.Originally posted by Gusaford:
Bingo.Originally posted by Chuck C:
I think we have been a solid overall team the last few years. The finishes at the NCAA's has proven this. The problem is that we haven't had that 2-3 very dominant guys that can rack up bonus points and put the team total over the top.
This is 100% correct. I think most of these coaches can tell after the wrestler's first or second year in the program what they have. This whole depth thing as many have said appears to be a fool's chase. To get 8-10 guys to all wrestle into the 3rd-8th place is extremely difficult--witness last 5 years for Iowa. Would rather see 2 sure-fire guys at 1-4 and then 4 or 5 guys battling for 3rd-8th.Originally posted by Jackhawk87:
Exactly. I think putting a bit of extra money into individual studs (like Metcalf or a Snyder, Bo Jordan, etc.) is a key to having a tourney championship team.Originally posted by Gusaford:
Bingo.Originally posted by Chuck C:
I think we have been a solid overall team the last few years. The finishes at the NCAA's has proven this. The problem is that we haven't had that 2-3 very dominant guys that can rack up bonus points and put the team total over the top.
Of course, you have to be right. Penn St has been very good at this strategy and do a good job of spreading their schollys out (?legally) but have also missed on the Altons and to some degree, even McIntosh. Ohio St. has successfully used it this year and are set up for future years with Snyder, Tomassello, and Bo Jordan.
Iowa has gone for depth and having no serious holes in the lineup. Having a top 15 kind of guy is great for duals, but doesn't get you diddly at Nationals.
Think I can agree with this, we're missing the #1 guy or guys. We were 1 stud away from it this year, we have the base but not the "star". Will one rise in the next couple years? IDK maybe...Originally posted by Jackhawk87:
Exactly. I think putting a bit of extra money into individual studs (like Metcalf or a Snyder, Bo Jordan, etc.) is a key to having a tourney championship team.Originally posted by Gusaford:
Bingo.Originally posted by Chuck C:
I think we have been a solid overall team the last few years. The finishes at the NCAA's has proven this. The problem is that we haven't had that 2-3 very dominant guys that can rack up bonus points and put the team total over the top.
Of course, you have to be right. Penn St has been very good at this strategy and do a good job of spreading their schollys out (?legally) but have also missed on the Altons and to some degree, even McIntosh. Ohio St. has successfully used it this year and are set up for future years with Snyder, Tomassello, and Bo Jordan.
Iowa has gone for depth and having no serious holes in the lineup. Having a top 15 kind of guy is great for duals, but doesn't get you diddly at Nationals.
Gilman ran into a freak incident in his semifinal. Why couldn't he find his way into the championship before his career is over as long as he gets the right draws (which is apparently a necessity anymore in the NCAAs...see Penn State and Ohio State over the last few years. Lucky draws against easier matchups and opponents who underperform....more than Iowa guys underperform.)Originally posted by Stanley75:
We don't have a hammer. No 0 or 1 loss guys that are capable of Championships.