ADVERTISEMENT

So when the Dept of Education goes away

I guess it depends on the depth of the concept of Trump's plan. A lot of the following sounds like revenge to me:

Protect Parents’ Rights

President Donald J. Trump fought tirelessly to expand charter schools and school choice for America’s children. He secured permanent funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities and protected free speech on college campuses. Now, the Harris-Biden Administration and the radical left are using the public school system to push their perverse sexual, racial, and political material on our youth. President Trump will cut federal funding for any school or program pushing Critical Race Theory or gender ideology on our children. His administration will open Civil Rights investigations into any school district that has engaged in race-based discrimination. President Trump will veto the sinister effort to weaponize civics education, keep men out of women’s sports, and create a credentialing body to certify teachers who embrace patriotic values. President Trump will reward states and school districts that abolish teacher tenure for grades K-12 and adopt Merit Pay, cut the number of school administrators, adopt a Parental Bill of Rights, and implement the direct election of school principals by the parents.

I’d say maybe 15-20% of that could be characterized as revenge and not a matter of educational policy (and that a good chunk of it is little more than election rhetoric). But the thing is, that 15-20% may well be the thing that moves voter needles when it comes to schools. Va taught us that in 2021. So double down on those issues at your peril.

And speaking of va, take a look at the wapo piece today on youngkin announcement of va’s school Assessment criteria.

At the end of the day the big picture is there’s a lot of social stuff that schools have become the locus for. Some of that is going to be detached, and rightfully so.
 
Maybe if you were in education you would see the unfairness of that. I can name a couple of schools in my district with really high test scores, along with some with lower scores. The teachers at the high testing schools aren’t better or harder working than the lower testing schools. It’s not comparing apples to apples.
No doubt. But there are plenty of ways to identify them and to slice and dice the incentives.
 
Don’t worry, this will be impossible.
I only have a few years left, unless bills like the one that got introduced in the House get passed…where people like me lose 40+ years of contributions to Social Security because we have pensions. Then I would have to go longer. Republicans consistently attack the little guy. This would be the second time they took money from my family.
 
I would be fine with dividing that budget by the number of students in the country (public schools) and give it to the schools. Maybe slant it towards the poorer districts.
 
Merit pay over tenure actually seems like a pretty good idea to me.
We had merit pay as part of a salary increase initiated by Branstad at one point in time. It was like a bonus we would get paid at the end of the year. There was very little difference in the amounts we received. Merit pay is only as effective as the evaluator that decides who gets what. It's not a magic formula to raise student achievement.
 
Last edited:
I’d say maybe 15-20% of that could be characterized as revenge and not a matter of educational policy (and that a good chunk of it is little more than election rhetoric). But the thing is, that 15-20% may well be the thing that moves voter needles when it comes to schools. Va taught us that in 2021. So double down on those issues at your peril.

And speaking of va, take a look at the wapo piece today on youngkin announcement of va’s school Assessment criteria.

At the end of the day the big picture is there’s a lot of social stuff that schools have become the locus for. Some of that is going to be detached, and rightfully so.
Most teachers would welcome having less on their plate. The problem is many of the issues mentioned aren't taught, but come up in individual incidents that happen in classrooms and schools that have to be addressed. I'm curious about the patriotic certification. What are the qualifications, implications, and ramifications of getting patriotic certifications. Can only Republican teachers receive the certification?
 
There are?
You yourself said you could I’d good ones. And there are plenty of ways, not only via data, but by subjective opinions of managers, to do so as well.

As to incentives, for example, comparison to an individuals baseline rather than a group median. And of course we’re not looking to turn people into fully commissioned sales reps. Tiis is hardly the first time people have tried to design an incentive structure that is fair to everyone. And notwithstanding the protest, teachers are not somehow uniquely incapable of responding to incentives.

Tom I get this is serious business — both of my parents were public school teachers, so I don’t come at this from some weirdo perspective.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Tom Paris
Most teachers would welcome having less on their plate. The problem is many of the issues mentioned aren't taught, but come up in individual incidents that happen in classrooms and schools that have to be addressed. I'm curious about the patriotic certification. What are the qualifications, implications, and ramifications of getting patriotic certifications. Can only Republican teachers receive the certification?
The patriotic certification, of course, is just silly.
 
Oh ffs! Damned near every republican candidate since Reagan has been threatening to do away with the Dept of Education and none of them have ever done ANYTHING to eliminate the size and scope of the federal govt.
 
Electing? No (though perhaps in situations where local school boards aren’t, as mine want until this year). Involved in hiring? Sure, why not.
School boards are the final approval for hiring any teacher or administrator. When my school hired a new superintendent the school board had the final three candidates meet with parent groups to get their feedback, but ultimately they made the decision. Our Principals mostly ended up being teachers hired from within, often because they were willing to do the necessary work to become qualified. I was asked to do so once, but I declined not because I didn't want to continue my education. I simply didn't want the headache of trying to make everyone happy while actually not making anyone happy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Aardvark86
A lot of you think covid caused issues with education, just wait until trump gets done with it. Luckily my kids are done and by the time my grand-kids come along hopefully it will be fixed from the trump damage.
 
You yourself said you could I’d good ones. And there are plenty of ways, not only via data, but by subjective opinions of managers, to do so as well.

As to incentives, for example, comparison to an individuals baseline rather than a group median. And of course we’re not looking to turn people into fully commissioned sales reps. Tiis is hardly the first time people have tried to design an incentive structure that is fair to everyone. And notwithstanding the protest, teachers are not somehow uniquely incapable of responding to incentives.

Tom I get this is serious business — both of my parents were public school teachers, so I don’t come at this from some weirdo perspective.
I’ll worry about this when it happens. The Trump administration would have to give control to the individual districts and if that’s the case, I’m really not worried about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aardvark86
I think some of you are missing the point here, the bulk of America just wants kids to get the education to perform at grade level in the basics - reading, writing, math, science. etc. and doesn't want to get caught up in tenure, excuses, union-shielding of underperforming teachers/administrators, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans81
I think some of you are missing the point here, the bulk of America just wants kids to get the education to perform at grade level in the basics - reading, writing, math, science. etc. and doesn't want to get caught up in tenure, excuses, union-shielding of underperforming teachers/administrators, etc.
Then why do none of the Trump proposals mention improving reading, writing, math, and science scores? Even though I hated "No Child Left Behind" at least this Republican initiative put priority on improving student scores not waging a culture war.
 
The US should do what Finland has done, all but eliminated private schools and regulates the few they have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
The Department of Education is going away?
He has mentioned that before. Not sure it'll happen. We were world #1 in education when the states ran education, and have done nothing but fall relative to the world since the DOE was established.

Is the formula that simple? I doubt it, but it probably needs an overhaul.

Educators are going to HATE that change at the micro level.
 
Maybe if you were in education you would see the unfairness of that. I can name a couple of schools in my district with really high test scores, along with some with lower scores. The teachers at the high testing schools aren’t better or harder working than the lower testing schools. It’s not comparing apples to apples.

How will merit pay be determined?

We had merit pay as part of a salary increase initiated by Branstad at one point in time. It was like a bonus we would get paid at the end of the year. There was very little difference in the amounts we received. Merit pay is only as effective as the evaluator that decides who gets what. It's not a magic formula to raise student achievement.

Fair points all around. I’m not sure how merit based pay would look and no, I am not in education. However, merit based pay works well in other entity pay structures I have been a part of. I do have 3 children in the public school system and we have been a part of the public school system for 13 years. You could just as easily make the claim it is unfair for the 6 year tenured teacher that is exceptional at their job is paid far less than the 35 year curmudgeon vet that is just there to get their pension. I’ve seen it plenty.
 
I only have a few years left, unless bills like the one that got introduced in the House get passed…where people like me lose 40+ years of contributions to Social Security because we have pensions. Then I would have to go longer. Republicans consistently attack the little guy. This would be the second time they took money from my family.

Link? What is this?
 
I think some of you are missing the point here, the bulk of America just wants kids to get the education to perform at grade level in the basics - reading, writing, math, science. etc. and doesn't want to get caught up in tenure, excuses, union-shielding of underperforming teachers/administrators, etc.
Why aren’t we getting helped then? Republican parents generally get it because they know us and know we care about their kids. But Republican leaders and many Republicans on this board attack us relentlessly. Jesus Christ, we are literally working our butts off trying to help children and people treat us like we’re awful people.
 
Fair points all around. I’m not sure how merit based pay would look and no, I am not in education. However, merit based pay works well in other entity pay structures I have been a part of. I do have 3 children in the public school system and we have been a part of the public school system for 13 years. You could just as easily make the claim it is unfair for the 6 year tenured teacher that is exceptional at their job is paid far less than the 35 year curmudgeon vet that is just there to get their pension. I’ve seen it plenty.
Most of the older teachers I have worked with are pretty damn great teachers.
 
Fair points all around. I’m not sure how merit based pay would look and no, I am not in education. However, merit based pay works well in other entity pay structures I have been a part of. I do have 3 children in the public school system and we have been a part of the public school system for 13 years. You could just as easily make the claim it is unfair for the 6 year tenured teacher that is exceptional at their job is paid far less than the 35 year curmudgeon vet that is just there to get their pension. I’ve seen it plenty.
I appreciate the response. My district once used merit pay with a portion of the staff, but abandoned it and that was welcome by all. I can see basing merit pay on student progress, much like what we are currently doing as a portion of their evaluation.
 
Maybe if you were in education you would see the unfairness of that. I can name a couple of schools in my district with really high test scores, along with some with lower scores. The teachers at the high testing schools aren’t better or harder working than the lower testing schools. It’s not comparing apples to apples.
Merit pay for teacher is like evaluating you based on how your fantasy football team does only you need a 75% victory rate and you don't get to choose the players on your team or who gets to play that day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Paris
DOE didn't exist prior to 1980,.. It's not a huge leap to consider life without it again.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: McLovin32
Then why do none of the Trump proposals mention improving reading, writing, math, and science scores? Even though I hated "No Child Left Behind" at least this Republican initiative put priority on improving student scores not waging a culture war.
Isn’t that common sense, that is, does it need to be “stated” that improving reading, writing, and math scores to grade level is a core principle? That’s like “stating” breathing is a core principle of living. Well, no shit. 😳
 
Isn’t that common sense, that is, does it need to be “stated” that improving reading, writing, and math scores to grade level is a core principle? That’s like “stating” breathing is a core principle of living. Well, no shit. 😳
I'm not seeing anything in the following to improve student achievement, could you point them out to me.

President Trump will cut federal funding for any school or program pushing Critical Race Theory or gender ideology on our children. His administration will open Civil Rights investigations into any school district that has engaged in race-based discrimination. President Trump will veto the sinister effort to weaponize civics education, keep men out of women’s sports, and create a credentialing body to certify teachers who embrace patriotic values. President Trump will reward states and school districts that abolish teacher tenure for grades K-12 and adopt Merit Pay, cut the number of school administrators, adopt a Parental Bill of Rights, and implement the direct election of school principals by the parents.
 

Education

The federal Department of Education would be targeted for elimination in a second Trump administration. That does not mean that Trump wants Washington out of classrooms. He still proposes, among other maneuvers, using federal funding as leverage to pressure K-12 school systems to abolish tenure and adopt merit pay for teachers and to scrap diversity programs at all levels of education. He calls for pulling federal funding “for any school or program pushing Critical Race Theory, gender ideology, or other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content on our children.”

He was being sarcastic, dummy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gohawks50
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT