ADVERTISEMENT

Speaker Johnson expresses ‘real reservations’ about motion to expel Santos

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,736
61,094
113
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Wednesday expressed “real reservations” about a motion to expel embattled Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) and said that lawmakers would be free to “vote their conscience” during a floor vote expected Thursday.

Keeping up with politics is easy with The 5-Minute Fix Newsletter, in your inbox weekdays.

“We’ve not whipped the vote, and we wouldn’t,” Johnson told reporters. “I trust that people will make that decision thoughtfully and in good faith. I personally have real reservations about doing this. I’m concerned about a precedent that may be set for that.”

Johnson said that GOP lawmakers had shared opinions “on both sides” regarding expelling Santos during a Republican conference meeting earlier Wednesday. Santos survived two previous expulsion efforts. The latest follows a scathing report from the House Ethics Committee that found “substantial evidence” that the freshman lawmaker knowingly violated ethics guidelines, House rules and criminal laws.



Expulsion from the House requires a two-thirds vote by members.
If removed by the House, Santos would only be the sixth lawmaker to be expelled from the House in U.S. history — and the first lawmaker to be removed in such a manner in modern times without having been convicted of a crime.
“There are people who say you have to uphold the rule of law and allow for someone to be convicted in a criminal court before this tough penalty would be exacted on someone,” Johnson said. “There are others who say, well, upholding the rule of law requires us to take this step now, because of some of the things that he’s alleged to have done.”
Johnson said allowing lawmakers to vote their conscience was “the only appropriate thing” GOP leadership could do.
11 of the most scathing allegations in the House ethics report about Santos
It was a fellow Republican, House Ethics Committee chairman Michael Guest (Miss.), who introduced the motion to expel Santos that will be considered Thursday. Guest filed the motion before lawmakers left for a Thanksgiving break. On Tuesday night, another Republican, Rep. Anthony D’Esposito (N.Y.), motioned to move Guest’s resolution under privilege, meaning it would have to be considered within 48 hours.



By filing the expulsion motion himself, Guest added credibility to the resolution after lawmakers were hesitant about voting to expel Santos earlier this month when the question was brought forth by fellow New York Republicans. That effort failed, with 182 Republicans and 31 Democrats voting against it, fearing that it would establish a precedent to oust lawmakers without due process.

A defiant Santos has long denied wrongdoing and continued to insist that he would never resign. Santos told reporters Tuesday that he had spoken with Johnson over the weekend, but that the House speaker had not encouraged him to resign.
“All these members are pushing this. They want me to resign because they don’t want to take this tough vote that sets the precedent to their own demise in the future. Because they’re not immune from all the nonsense that goes on in Washington,” Santos said. “My message to them is 'either put out or shut up’ and enough of this charade.”



The Ethics Committee report, which was published Nov. 16, accused Santos of — among other things — stealing money from his campaign, deceiving donors about how contributions would be used, creating fictitious loans and engaging in fraudulent business dealings. Santos, the report alleged, repeatedly used funds intended for his campaign for personal enrichment, including spa charges and paying down his own credit card debt.
The long-awaited report laid out the conclusions of the committee’s months-long investigation in scathing language. According to the committee, investigators compiled more than 170,000 pages of documents and testimony from dozens of witnesses, including financial statements, to reach its conclusions.
“Representative Santos sought to fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit. He blatantly stole from his campaign. He deceived donors into providing what they thought were contributions to his campaign but were in fact payments for his personal benefit,” the report stated.
The New York Republican also faces 23 federal charges, including fraud, money laundering, falsifying records and aggravated identity theft.

 
Pieces of shit stick together.

depositphotos_5459393-stock-photo-poo-in-a-meadow.jpg
 
I'm telling you all we need is a rumor that Santos is sexually attracted to Mike Johnson and suddenly Mike Johnson would be whipping the vote to get rid of him.

But sure keep him, probably doesn't matter in the long run and the Dems can run ads about how this is type of guy you stand with.

For the record the senate ethics committee needs to do it's report on Bob Menendez so he can be expelled too.
 
Looks like Johnson learned to count.
Florida’s own Matt Gaetz has an ethics report going, and I read last week that Kevin McCarthy and his loyalists want to push it out soon in order to get him expelled.
Johnson can’t afford to lose any votes.
 
That doesn't really change the statement he made though.

Ehh I'm guessing most don't use donor money for personal expenses outside of the fact that they are allowed by law to pay themselves a salary within certain limitations.

That said there are plenty of perfectly legal ways they grift from their position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher
"I’m concerned about a precedent that may be set for that.”

He's right to be concerned. If you kick one person off the gravy train, regardless of the reason, then it becomes easier to kick other people off, too. Before long, they'll all be in danger of being exposed as grifters and cheaters and liars, and spending donor money on themselves, and then it's the insider trading, the quid pro quos, and eventually they'll all fear for their livelihoods if malfeasance is punished. Better to stop it now before it has a chance to get started.
 
Ehh I'm guessing most don't use donor money for personal expenses outside of the fact that they are allowed by law to pay themselves a salary within certain limitations.

That said there are plenty of perfectly legal ways they grift from their position.
They just don't get caught doing it, but you are right about the grifting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Paris
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Wednesday expressed “real reservations” about a motion to expel embattled Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) and said that lawmakers would be free to “vote their conscience” during a floor vote expected Thursday.

Keeping up with politics is easy with The 5-Minute Fix Newsletter, in your inbox weekdays.

“We’ve not whipped the vote, and we wouldn’t,” Johnson told reporters. “I trust that people will make that decision thoughtfully and in good faith. I personally have real reservations about doing this. I’m concerned about a precedent that may be set for that.”

Johnson said that GOP lawmakers had shared opinions “on both sides” regarding expelling Santos during a Republican conference meeting earlier Wednesday. Santos survived two previous expulsion efforts. The latest follows a scathing report from the House Ethics Committee that found “substantial evidence” that the freshman lawmaker knowingly violated ethics guidelines, House rules and criminal laws.



Expulsion from the House requires a two-thirds vote by members.
If removed by the House, Santos would only be the sixth lawmaker to be expelled from the House in U.S. history — and the first lawmaker to be removed in such a manner in modern times without having been convicted of a crime.
“There are people who say you have to uphold the rule of law and allow for someone to be convicted in a criminal court before this tough penalty would be exacted on someone,” Johnson said. “There are others who say, well, upholding the rule of law requires us to take this step now, because of some of the things that he’s alleged to have done.”
Johnson said allowing lawmakers to vote their conscience was “the only appropriate thing” GOP leadership could do.
11 of the most scathing allegations in the House ethics report about Santos
It was a fellow Republican, House Ethics Committee chairman Michael Guest (Miss.), who introduced the motion to expel Santos that will be considered Thursday. Guest filed the motion before lawmakers left for a Thanksgiving break. On Tuesday night, another Republican, Rep. Anthony D’Esposito (N.Y.), motioned to move Guest’s resolution under privilege, meaning it would have to be considered within 48 hours.



By filing the expulsion motion himself, Guest added credibility to the resolution after lawmakers were hesitant about voting to expel Santos earlier this month when the question was brought forth by fellow New York Republicans. That effort failed, with 182 Republicans and 31 Democrats voting against it, fearing that it would establish a precedent to oust lawmakers without due process.

A defiant Santos has long denied wrongdoing and continued to insist that he would never resign. Santos told reporters Tuesday that he had spoken with Johnson over the weekend, but that the House speaker had not encouraged him to resign.
“All these members are pushing this. They want me to resign because they don’t want to take this tough vote that sets the precedent to their own demise in the future. Because they’re not immune from all the nonsense that goes on in Washington,” Santos said. “My message to them is 'either put out or shut up’ and enough of this charade.”



The Ethics Committee report, which was published Nov. 16, accused Santos of — among other things — stealing money from his campaign, deceiving donors about how contributions would be used, creating fictitious loans and engaging in fraudulent business dealings. Santos, the report alleged, repeatedly used funds intended for his campaign for personal enrichment, including spa charges and paying down his own credit card debt.
The long-awaited report laid out the conclusions of the committee’s months-long investigation in scathing language. According to the committee, investigators compiled more than 170,000 pages of documents and testimony from dozens of witnesses, including financial statements, to reach its conclusions.
“Representative Santos sought to fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit. He blatantly stole from his campaign. He deceived donors into providing what they thought were contributions to his campaign but were in fact payments for his personal benefit,” the report stated.
The New York Republican also faces 23 federal charges, including fraud, money laundering, falsifying records and aggravated identity theft.

This isn't even difficult. Republican leaders are pure trash.
 
It's likely the GOP loses that NY seat if there's a special election to fill GS's seat.
Waiting allows the NY Republicans to recruit a candidate, primary Santos, and fundraiser for them when they're on the 2024 ballot.

Republicans are not worried about doing the right thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TC Nole OX
Sad, but not at all surprising. He’ll soon be down to a 1-3 vote majority and doing the right thing will not stand in the way of clinging to power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
It's likely the GOP loses that NY seat if there's a special election to fill GS's seat.
Waiting allows the NY Republicans to recruit a candidate, primary Santos, and fundraiser for them when they're on the 2024 ballot.

Republicans are not worried about doing the right thing.
It is a red leaning district. Biden won it in 2020, but the rest of the office holders and how they voted in the last Senate campaign is red.
That being said, I have no idea why Johnson, Jordan, Stefanik, and the rest of the Republican leadership is protecting a guy who stole campaign money to use on a Members Only account and to get botox injections. It's a can of corn to expel him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MitchLL
It is a red leaning district. Biden won it in 2020, but the rest of the office holders and how they voted in the last Senate campaign is red.
That being said, I have no idea why Johnson, Jordan, Stefanik, and the rest of the Republican leadership is protecting a guy who stole campaign money to use on a Members Only account and to get botox injections. It's a can of corn to expel him.
As has already been discussed, it's kinda amazing the Dem candidate made so little effort to research GS's background before that election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
I have no idea why Johnson, Jordan, Stefanik, and the rest of the Republican leadership is protecting a guy who stole campaign money to use on a Members Only account and to get botox injections.
Have to hold onto that power, even if it means selling your soul.
 
As has already been discussed, it's kinda amazing the Dem candidate made so little effort to research GS's background before that election.

He went thru a primary as well. I think everyone just expected that district to go blue or something so they figured why bother.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MitchLL
It is a red leaning district. Biden won it in 2020, but the rest of the office holders and how they voted in the last Senate campaign is red.
That being said, I have no idea why Johnson, Jordan, Stefanik, and the rest of the Republican leadership is protecting a guy who stole campaign money to use on a Members Only account and to get botox injections. It's a can of corn to expel him.
s-l1200.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole and GES4
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Wednesday expressed “real reservations” about a motion to expel embattled Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) and said that lawmakers would be free to “vote their conscience” during a floor vote expected Thursday.

Keeping up with politics is easy with The 5-Minute Fix Newsletter, in your inbox weekdays.

“We’ve not whipped the vote, and we wouldn’t,” Johnson told reporters. “I trust that people will make that decision thoughtfully and in good faith. I personally have real reservations about doing this. I’m concerned about a precedent that may be set for that.”

Johnson said that GOP lawmakers had shared opinions “on both sides” regarding expelling Santos during a Republican conference meeting earlier Wednesday. Santos survived two previous expulsion efforts. The latest follows a scathing report from the House Ethics Committee that found “substantial evidence” that the freshman lawmaker knowingly violated ethics guidelines, House rules and criminal laws.



Expulsion from the House requires a two-thirds vote by members.
If removed by the House, Santos would only be the sixth lawmaker to be expelled from the House in U.S. history — and the first lawmaker to be removed in such a manner in modern times without having been convicted of a crime.
“There are people who say you have to uphold the rule of law and allow for someone to be convicted in a criminal court before this tough penalty would be exacted on someone,” Johnson said. “There are others who say, well, upholding the rule of law requires us to take this step now, because of some of the things that he’s alleged to have done.”
Johnson said allowing lawmakers to vote their conscience was “the only appropriate thing” GOP leadership could do.
11 of the most scathing allegations in the House ethics report about Santos
It was a fellow Republican, House Ethics Committee chairman Michael Guest (Miss.), who introduced the motion to expel Santos that will be considered Thursday. Guest filed the motion before lawmakers left for a Thanksgiving break. On Tuesday night, another Republican, Rep. Anthony D’Esposito (N.Y.), motioned to move Guest’s resolution under privilege, meaning it would have to be considered within 48 hours.



By filing the expulsion motion himself, Guest added credibility to the resolution after lawmakers were hesitant about voting to expel Santos earlier this month when the question was brought forth by fellow New York Republicans. That effort failed, with 182 Republicans and 31 Democrats voting against it, fearing that it would establish a precedent to oust lawmakers without due process.

A defiant Santos has long denied wrongdoing and continued to insist that he would never resign. Santos told reporters Tuesday that he had spoken with Johnson over the weekend, but that the House speaker had not encouraged him to resign.
“All these members are pushing this. They want me to resign because they don’t want to take this tough vote that sets the precedent to their own demise in the future. Because they’re not immune from all the nonsense that goes on in Washington,” Santos said. “My message to them is 'either put out or shut up’ and enough of this charade.”



The Ethics Committee report, which was published Nov. 16, accused Santos of — among other things — stealing money from his campaign, deceiving donors about how contributions would be used, creating fictitious loans and engaging in fraudulent business dealings. Santos, the report alleged, repeatedly used funds intended for his campaign for personal enrichment, including spa charges and paying down his own credit card debt.
The long-awaited report laid out the conclusions of the committee’s months-long investigation in scathing language. According to the committee, investigators compiled more than 170,000 pages of documents and testimony from dozens of witnesses, including financial statements, to reach its conclusions.
“Representative Santos sought to fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit. He blatantly stole from his campaign. He deceived donors into providing what they thought were contributions to his campaign but were in fact payments for his personal benefit,” the report stated.
The New York Republican also faces 23 federal charges, including fraud, money laundering, falsifying records and aggravated identity theft.


Yeah, hate to set that precedent of House members having ethics. Granted, it's a relative thing, but Santos failed to meet even the very low bar of ethical behavior of Congress
 
When is the vote?
The debate is going on now. Striking to see which scumbags are standing up to defend Santos.
Up right now, Florida's own Matt Gaetz. Gaetz might be whistling past the graveyard.
Insurrectionist and assaulter of citizens Clay Higgins just gave an passionate defense of Santos.
Deplorables on parade right now.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT