Uh. I think it is you that is. Yeah, pretty sure actually.
State continues to get sh**tier
- Thread starter BlIIlken2
- Start date
More than were working there before it was built.
Good high paying jobs.
In addition hundreds if not thousands of contruction workers involved in the building of these projects.
Tax revenue, etc.
Nor a "medical expert". You're pretty much ignorant on most of the core issues here, in fact.
You've got at least 2 MDs posting on here agreeing with my posts.
#Dunning-KrugerEffect
Yes. Ill agree with that. I dont like the reproductive health term but putting that fine point aside, yes.
You can also agree that the plan requires interpretation of what drugs are legal and not legal, right?
I'm not posting my credentials on here but rest assured they would qualify.
Does @HawkMD dispute the facts I am stating? I doubt it.
One can dispute the exact legal meaning of what the House file states but the medical facts I have described are on point I assure you. How those are interpreted are for lawyers to decide. And I am sure they will opine if this becomes law. I am simply telling you what, from a medical perspective, the proposal seems to allow and not allow.
You are neither a legal nor a medical expert.
Yes. See my post below. That is what I have attempt to do from a medical perspective.
Rest assured major players like Google, Meta, Apple and Microsoft have no problem investing billions of dollars in iowa. I'm not sure what the name of the rinky dink company was that decided to build in San Fran but it wasn't one of the big boys.
Data Centers Do Not Make Iowa a High Tech State
Dave Swenson The news out of West Des Moines last week was that Microsoft will add a third data center. At first glance, a data center cluster looks to be popping-up in Iowa. We have the three Microsoft projects in West Des Moines, Facebook’s two complexes on the other side of the metro in...
www.bleedingheartland.com
I don't know. In Missouri, professional negligence is the failure to use the degree of skill/learning ordinarily used by other pros in the same/similar circumstances.
I don't know if in either MO or IA there is a local component that would hold a teaching hospital / academic/ U of I doctor to a higher standard than a doctor in Carroll for example.
Unbiased reporting from Bleedingheartland LOL LOL LOL.Data Centers Do Not Make Iowa a High Tech State
Dave Swenson The news out of West Des Moines last week was that Microsoft will add a third data center. At first glance, a data center cluster looks to be popping-up in Iowa. We have the three Microsoft projects in West Des Moines, Facebook’s two complexes on the other side of the metro in...
If any of those companies moved their operations or engineering to Iowa I would agree with you. Data centers are mostly self running. The people who designed them do not live in Iowa.
You think Google, Microsoft, and Apple employing a couple hundred security guards and technicians prove that Iowa is some kind of bustling technology epicenter. LOL LOL LOL.
About the same as you saying companies move out of Iowa because of politics. LOL LOL LOL
Oops!Data Centers Do Not Make Iowa a High Tech State
Dave Swenson The news out of West Des Moines last week was that Microsoft will add a third data center. At first glance, a data center cluster looks to be popping-up in Iowa. We have the three Microsoft projects in West Des Moines, Facebook’s two complexes on the other side of the metro in...
No; they are for doctors and their patients to decide.
You've admitted this is shitty, vague legislation, which is the intent - BAN these drugs from regular use.
I dont think so. Seems clear to me what is allowed and what isnt. But I am also smart enough to know that as with anything the legislature creates, the reality is ultimately determined by legal counsel and precedent.
I know what I'll be doing. Ill wait for the law to come down and resolve it, for it will be.
You just said the law requires interpretation. That's not specific. That's vague. As far as I can tell no specific drugs are listed or specific classes of drugs. Determining this is open for whomever as far as I can see
@JWolf74. I'm surprised you havent responded. Like actually responded.
I dont think it is as vague as you claim no. I dont think it bans it's regular use, just its use as an abortifacient. I know what I will be doing personally yes. I also know that laws always get worked out because someone will sue and the court will decide.
It specifically says mifepristone. Thats pretty specific.
"1.Not withstanding any other provision of law to the contrary ,it is unlawful for any person to manufacture, distribute, prescribe, dispense ,sell, or transfer mifepristone, mifegyne, or
mifeprex, or any substantially similar generic or non-generic abortifacient drug in the state".
Fair enough. Why is this drug being banned? It is FDA approved and heavily regulated on who can prescribe it.
Well because the state legislature feels that it wants to regulate abortion in the state. By all its means. That seems fairly obvious.
Shouldn't you be putting away the basketballs from 7th period class about now?
Are you asking me "why"?..........Another move it you don't like it person. Lame. (Hey, I never said you couldn't move or that you had to move now did I? I simply said Iowa > your version of Iowa..........#deal with it.............but also if you don't like getting fisted, then maybe do something about it........because clearly............and I do mean clearly...........complaining about getting fisted is not helping. Just sayin)
Btw, and maybe you can answer because nobody else on the right wants to, but why isn't abortion chargeable murder?
There is in my experience and the information I have been given from counsel regarding cases I have done. It would also almost certainly be my opinion depending on the circumstances in a case. Yes, the standard of care depends on where the care is provided, which services are available at the time the care is requested. Rural vs metro being the main issue.
And I have asked you this before, provide an example of it being misused in Iowa.
It isnt misused as the law stands. This is a change to restrict the use of it for abortion. I dont get your point.
