ADVERTISEMENT

Steve King at it again, wants to do away with birthright citizenship

THE_DEVIL

HB King
Gold Member
Aug 16, 2005
66,031
82,698
113
Hell, Michigan
www.livecoinwatch.com
House Republicans Go After Birthright Citizenship
WASHINGTON -- Democrats in Congress frequently accuse the GOP of attacking immigrants, and on Wednesday, House Republicans gave them more fodder by holding a hearing on whether the U.S. should continue the longstanding practice of granting citizenship to all children born here.

Some Republicans argue that birthright citizenship incentivizes unauthorized immigration and birth tourism. They add that the 14th Amendment, which states that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States," has been misinterpreted to apply to children of undocumented immigrants.

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) and Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) have both introduced bills this year to end birthright citizenship, but neither has gone for a vote.

Even if those bills never get a vote -- and they likely won't -- the fact that the issue got a hearing at all provided fuel for Democrats, who were fiery in their defense of the right for babies born on U.S. soil to be citizens.

"This birthright citizenship legislation and a decision to hold a hearing on its merits are outrageous examples of just how far shameless Republicans are willing to go to demonstrate their hatred for immigrants," Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said at a press conference, accusing Republicans of using the bill to stigmatize and sow hate for immigrants.

At the same press conference, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) said, "In Spanish-language media there will be one more piece of evidence that Republicans will do anything and everything to keep their nativist wing happy."

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) issued a statement accusing Republicans of pandering "to the most radical, anti-immigrant corners of their party" and called the idea "one of the most loathsome, xenophobic proposals in recent memory." In a separate statement, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) called the hearing "a humiliating reminder of the jingoistic insensitivity of the few toward multiculturalism and the changing face of America in the 21st Century."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/29/house-republicans-birthright-citizenship_n_7174686.html
 
While Iowa is mostly filled with natives without a real dog in this fight, that LA guy has balls. Balls he has to pay others to hold, but balls all the same.
 
I actually wouldn't mind this issue being debated in the public arena. I'm sick and tired of illegal women coming into this country to deliver their babies and then when they finally get caught they claim they have to stay because their child is an American and shouldn't be punished for the illegal actions of the parent. It's the same argument they use to justify financial aid for colleges going to illegals, etc. There should be some kind of punishment, or at least disincentive, if you break the law then you shouldn't be rewarded with citizenship or gov't benefits. There are too many illegals in this country and they are screwing the low skilled worker by artificially deflating wages.

Maybe I'd be more sympathetic is we were really serious about securing the borders, but they are as porous as ever. Neither party is serious about curbing immigration. The Dems are in bed with the open border hispanic groups to get more future Dem voters and the GOP is in bed with the Chamber of Commerce who want the cheap labor. They both are hurting this country and it's citizens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HallofFame
Wealthy people from China are now traveling here to have kids in the United States to establish citizenship by birth. Our welcoming stance has created something I don't think we intended. This proposed bill may not be the right approach, but we probably should be having a discussion about how to keep people from gaming the system.
 
It's difficult to remember when republicans are okay with twisting the constitution to mean whatever you want it to mean and when we have to take a strict interpretation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: herky4life
Can we deny poors citizenship too while we are at it?
How about earned citizenship for all? Make it like Starship Troopers.
flat550x550075f-u2.jpg
 
Wow. Born in the US? Not a citizen. Can we make all of these new laws retroactive? How many posters would have to leave? The majority?
 
Wealthy people from China are now traveling here to have kids in the United States to establish citizenship by birth. Our welcoming stance has created something I don't think we intended. This proposed bill may not be the right approach, but we probably should be having a discussion about how to keep people from gaming the system.

Was that thing "we didn't intend" that wealthy foreigners would have citizenship?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT