Online betting companies require register users to consent to share their location data with GeoComply. Given that, do these plaintiffs have a reasonable expectation of privacy in GeoComply's location data? If not, the Fourth Amendment protections, including the warrant clause, do not apply.
And, one step further, qualified immunity requires that there is clearly established pre-existing legal authority that law enforcement cannot tap into this data without probable cause and a warrant.
This is a huge hurdle for the plaintiffs. The raw location data is not private.