ADVERTISEMENT

The Condition of the State is vindictive

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,420
58,907
113
As Gov. Kim Reynolds pitched her vastly expanded plan for offering private school students publicly funded scholarships, she delivered this remarkable line.

“If we’re really going to make sure that every child has a quality education, then we have to set aside this us versus them mentality,” the governor said during her Condition of the State speech Tuesday evening.

This was exceedingly rich coming from a governor who spent a year on the campaign trail describing Iowa’s public schools as liberal indoctrination factories with “pornographic” books in their libraries, drag shows and pronoun lessons. Flee, parents, flee while you can.

Advertisement

She met behind closed doors with Linn-Mar parents and politicians who oppose policies supporting transgender students. Locking out anyone with a dissenting opinion would seem to scream “us versus them.” I’ve heard from many educators who feel under siege given the Republican attacks on public education. It’s tough for them to not see this as us versus them.

It was also an astounding sentiment given that the governor spent a considerable portion of her address seeking to settle scores with her critics, “including the media and even so-called experts.”

She derided Iowans who opposed gutting a 40-year-old collective bargaining law for public employees in 2017.

“And we’ve seen employee relations improve,” Reynolds claimed, straight-faced.

Reynolds lashed out at critics of Republican tax cuts. She singled out the Associated Press for a story during the pandemic that said her “aggressive push” to reopen schools created a “tension between science and politics.”

Yep, the governor of Iowa used her biggest moment and highest-profile stage to complain about a news article she didn’t like in 2020. She repeatedly said her critics were peddling “hysteria.” The condition of the state is vindictive.

Opinion Newsletter Signup​


Newsletter Signup
checkmark-yellow.png
Delivered to your inbox daily






But hey, let’s cut out all this us vs. them stuff. You first, governor.


Under Reynolds’ latest private school scholarship plan, qualifying families would get the full $7,598 in state per-pupil funding, more than she proposed last year. Although the first two years would be limited based on a family’s income level, by year three, every student in Iowa would be eligible.


How many tens or hundreds of millions of dollars that will cost is anyone’s guess. In year one, it will cost $107 million.


So for parents who need help affording private schools, including schools that better fit their “faith and moral convictions,” it’s all about money. For public schools, the governor insisted it “isn’t about money.”


She proved that in her budget, which socks away a $2 billion surplus and provides a 2.5 percent increase in state school funding. She tossed public schools assorted bones, including help for struggling school districts, but didn’t attach a dollar value. She once again argued Florida is the guiding light of education Iowa must follow.


Public schools are facing a squeeze. Private school scholarships will siphon off state funding. The bill for Republican tax cuts has yet to fully come due. Now Republicans are talking about property tax cuts.


Her critics no doubt will be dubbed hysterical. But, sure, it’s not us versus them.


(319) 398-8262; todd.dorman@thegazette.com

 
Todd Dorman is correct. Most everything she talked about was “us versus them”.

She did not speak of the CO2 pipelines and her advocating the use of eminent domain for private companies gain. This has to be stopped. The ethanol companies are the beneficiaries as they will receive large tax credits.
 
As Gov. Kim Reynolds pitched her vastly expanded plan for offering private school students publicly funded scholarships, she delivered this remarkable line.

“If we’re really going to make sure that every child has a quality education, then we have to set aside this us versus them mentality,” the governor said during her Condition of the State speech Tuesday evening.

This was exceedingly rich coming from a governor who spent a year on the campaign trail describing Iowa’s public schools as liberal indoctrination factories with “pornographic” books in their libraries, drag shows and pronoun lessons. Flee, parents, flee while you can.

Advertisement

She met behind closed doors with Linn-Mar parents and politicians who oppose policies supporting transgender students. Locking out anyone with a dissenting opinion would seem to scream “us versus them.” I’ve heard from many educators who feel under siege given the Republican attacks on public education. It’s tough for them to not see this as us versus them.

It was also an astounding sentiment given that the governor spent a considerable portion of her address seeking to settle scores with her critics, “including the media and even so-called experts.”

She derided Iowans who opposed gutting a 40-year-old collective bargaining law for public employees in 2017.

“And we’ve seen employee relations improve,” Reynolds claimed, straight-faced.

Reynolds lashed out at critics of Republican tax cuts. She singled out the Associated Press for a story during the pandemic that said her “aggressive push” to reopen schools created a “tension between science and politics.”

Yep, the governor of Iowa used her biggest moment and highest-profile stage to complain about a news article she didn’t like in 2020. She repeatedly said her critics were peddling “hysteria.” The condition of the state is vindictive.

Opinion Newsletter Signup​


Newsletter Signup
checkmark-yellow.png
Delivered to your inbox daily






But hey, let’s cut out all this us vs. them stuff. You first, governor.


Under Reynolds’ latest private school scholarship plan, qualifying families would get the full $7,598 in state per-pupil funding, more than she proposed last year. Although the first two years would be limited based on a family’s income level, by year three, every student in Iowa would be eligible.


How many tens or hundreds of millions of dollars that will cost is anyone’s guess. In year one, it will cost $107 million.


So for parents who need help affording private schools, including schools that better fit their “faith and moral convictions,” it’s all about money. For public schools, the governor insisted it “isn’t about money.”


She proved that in her budget, which socks away a $2 billion surplus and provides a 2.5 percent increase in state school funding. She tossed public schools assorted bones, including help for struggling school districts, but didn’t attach a dollar value. She once again argued Florida is the guiding light of education Iowa must follow.


Public schools are facing a squeeze. Private school scholarships will siphon off state funding. The bill for Republican tax cuts has yet to fully come due. Now Republicans are talking about property tax cuts.


Her critics no doubt will be dubbed hysterical. But, sure, it’s not us versus them.


(319) 398-8262; todd.dorman@thegazette.com

If I wanted to raise test scores I think investing more in private school spending vs the teachers unions might be a smart option.
Just sayin.
 
If I wanted to raise test scores I think investing more in private school spending vs the teachers unions might be a smart option.
Just sayin.
You wouldn’t know a smart option if it punched you in the dick.
 
If I wanted to raise test scores I think investing more in private school spending vs the teachers unions might be a smart option.
Just sayin.
Maybe research educational outcomes in states with strong teachers' unions vs. those without. Let us know what you learn. (Spoiler: States with better working conditions for teachers, which are thus able to attract better teachers, generally do better.)

Instead, the plan is to funnel taxpayer money to private (mostly religious) institutions. Unlike public schools,
*They are not required to accept all students.
*They are not required to adhere to state learning standards.
*They are not required to report on their learning outcomes.
*If they don't want to deal with a student, they can just expel them and let public schools deal with whatever the issues are.
For a governor who likes to talk about accountability, there is none here.

This plan uses tax money to make the rich richer and promote religious ideology, which seems to me to be the opposite of what we should be striving to do.
 
She cut the annual increase in school funds in half. Just saying.

Iowa has fallen far behind the national leaders in spending per student.

30 years ago, Iowa was Top 5 in school/student performance (when they spent more); today they are pretty much middle of the pack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Increase is the important part…
Increases that are significantly less than inflation aren't really increases...

During the recession, teachers' pay was frozen because there wasn't tax revenue available. Then, over the past few years, when tax revenues and inflation were up, the state legislature couldn't find their checkbook and decided to cut taxes instead of allowing tax salaries to at least increase at the rate of inflation.

With the current climate, why would any high school or college graduate choose to teach in Iowa, and what does that portend for the future of education in our state?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Iowa has fallen far behind the national leaders in spending per student.

30 years ago, Iowa was Top 5 in school/student performance (when they spent more); today they are pretty much middle of the pack.
We're middle of the pack in everything these days. People claim Kimmy is a great leader. Hard to say your coach is great when you have a .500 team and losing more games with each passing season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
You want to cut teacher's pay?

Technically you could cut the annual budgetary increase by 75%, not cut existing teacher pay, accommodate normal inflationary trends and still expand spending slightly,... A smaller annual increase is still an increase.
 
No. No. It doesn’t keep up with the constant rising costs so districts are forced to cut adults who work with children. We need more adults in our buildings desperately.

I might be slightly over stating this - but 100% of our HORT MAGAs wouldn’t last a single day working in education at the actual school level.
 
Last edited:
Not cut existing pay? So teachers never get pay increases?

I didn't say never,.. I'm just saying that cutting the annual budgetary increase for a given year doesn't automatically result in teacher pay cuts.
 
Conservative Iowans on this board incessantly bitch about public school quality. Kim’s proposal is to cut their funding and funnel it instead to private schools.

What a genius plan to improve Iowa’s public schools. Kimmy is getting paid for this ridiculous proposal but only if it becomes a reality. I have some faith that most republicans in the statehouse know exactly what she’s up to. Unlikely to go anywhere and she knows it too.
 
I didn't say never,.. I'm just saying that cutting the annual budgetary increase for a given year doesn't automatically result in teacher pay cuts.
What a lousy idea especially when the state is sitting on a record surplus.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT