Welp, chalk another win in the conspiracy theorist column. No wonder Wray the rat is running away.
The J6 Conspiracy Theorists Were Right..
- Thread starter Scruddy
- Start date
Welp, chalk another win in the conspiracy theorist column. No wonder Wray the rat is running away.
It's funny watching the libs try to defend this.
yOu SaId tHeY wErE pArT Of tHe FBI!!!
They were paid government actors. If they can prove a single one of them said "go inside" there should be some version of entrapment or something they get off on. A cop should not be able to convince you to commit a crime.
yOu SaId tHeY wErE pArT Of tHe FBI!!!
They were paid government actors. If they can prove a single one of them said "go inside" there should be some version of entrapment or something they get off on. A cop should not be able to convince you to commit a crime.
Last edited:
They’re not cops. You’re literally conflating the two in your post.
And yet, not one of these "embeds" was listed at anyone's trial as a reason for all the crimin'....
Almost like it's another nothingburger.
Almost like it's another nothingburger.
So three CHS who were tasked with being there, and those were to monitor suspected terrorists. Only one entered the Capitol.
- The OIG determined that three of those CHSs had been tasked by FBI field offices to report on specific domestic terrorism case subjects who were possibly attending the events of January 6. One of these three CHSs entered the Capitol during the riot. The other two entered the restricted area around the Capitol.
- Twenty-three additional FBI CHSs were in Washington, D.C., and attended January 6 events, but we determined that these CHSs did so on their own initiative and were not tasked by FBI field offices to attend the events. Of these 23 CHSs, three CHSs entered the Capitol during the riot and an additional 11 entered the restricted area around the Capitol.
- No Undercover FBI Employees at Protests or at the Capitol on January 6. We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6.
We can mostly all agree that ray epps was clearly a fed at this stage, right?
Do you have any children? If so, how is your relationship with them?
Why are you sick, leftist ****s always consumed by children?
I can't believe that some are still trying to downplay what happened on J6. Could there have been undercover FBI agents there... maybe if these loonies were being infiltrated. Doesn't mean that these MAGA loonies didn't do bad things. Doesn't mean non-loonies need to act like it didn't happen or blame anyone but the loonies. How about some personal responsibility for Christs sake.
Almost...... but you know... nothing like that.
You think a civilian knew who the informants were prior to this?
To say "that's one of the guys who told me to go in"
Dipshit.
You are defending the government propelling chaos due to team politics.
And they got caught.
Be better.
Just ****ing give it up! lol Your party's over reaction, whining, crying and bawling about a non-event is in part what restored MAGA to its rightful place! In that case, I guess continue whining about it!🥳
You are correct there, but like a broken clock, he's usually right twice a day!
If you think they only had 26 people in the crowd, you don't know much about the US intelligence community. To this point, they've either refused to answer or lied and said there weren't any, so why should anyone believe they only had 26? They only admit to things that they can no longer deny, nothing more. Their job is to lie and they are very good at it.
So three CHS who were tasked with being there, and those were to monitor suspected terrorists. Only one entered the Capitol.
- The OIG determined that three of those CHSs had been tasked by FBI field offices to report on specific domestic terrorism case subjects who were possibly attending the events of January 6. One of these three CHSs entered the Capitol during the riot. The other two entered the restricted area around the Capitol.
- Twenty-three additional FBI CHSs were in Washington, D.C., and attended January 6 events, but we determined that these CHSs did so on their own initiative and were not tasked by FBI field offices to attend the events. Of these 23 CHSs, three CHSs entered the Capitol during the riot and an additional 11 entered the restricted area around the Capitol.
- No Undercover FBI Employees at Protests or at the Capitol on January 6. We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6.
Ergo: Another OP NothingBurger Here.
so now we dont want the fbi putting informants into bad acting groups? strange
The report said there were 0 undercover fbi agents there. Considering how crazy these groups like the proud boys are its not surprising that there were 26 confidential informants in the area.
Where's Cheney in all this? Or the rest of the J6 committee? I thought they did a thural investigation.
So paid informants were there starting crap. Bought and paid for by the FBI. The story is that the FBI did it. Doesn't matter how many Agents were there.
Yes; that's what we wrote.
The criminals charged committed criminal acts of their own volition.
If "paid informants" were starting crap, they'd have been identified and charged, too.
there's thousands of people in jail for drug crimes thrilled to hear that the use of criminal informants invalidates crimes that were committed
Doubtful,.. Far more likely that they would have been identified as CI's and released...
We don't want fbi assets like ray epps telling people to commit crimes on video. This isn't complicated stuff..
The leftists in this board are scary. The FBI lied about this to Congress and the American people. Their role in this needs to thoroughly investigated.
Having informants in the crowd would be expected. Having actual agents undercover would also be expected if we are truly dealing with domestic terrorist organizations. Why lie though? One could easily disclose without revealing too much. The American people would understand the nuance between saying yes we had people in place and this was their role without saying more than that in an open forum. Handled correctly it would actually build confidence in the FBI. This behavior by the FBI and lying about it does the opposite.
Everything about January 6th needs to be looked at again. Everything including the congressional committee thay destroyed evidence.
Having informants in the crowd would be expected. Having actual agents undercover would also be expected if we are truly dealing with domestic terrorist organizations. Why lie though? One could easily disclose without revealing too much. The American people would understand the nuance between saying yes we had people in place and this was their role without saying more than that in an open forum. Handled correctly it would actually build confidence in the FBI. This behavior by the FBI and lying about it does the opposite.
Everything about January 6th needs to be looked at again. Everything including the congressional committee thay destroyed evidence.
Ray Epps, Target of Jan. 6 Conspiracy Theory, Is Sentenced to Probation
The onetime Trump supporter was driven into hiding after Fox News and prominent Republicans spread a false narrative that he was a government agent who helped instigate the attack on the Capitol.i expect our resident conservative social media maniacs to just read a headline and regurgitate what other people are saying/tweeting...its all they do
but it is concerning that both the VP and the world's richest man (who has incredible influence on this administration) do the same thing. their thoughts and actions actually matter, and now it's clear that instead of reading the actual report, they'd rather just go along with the social media narratives
I guess when the most important thing is "owning" for your political opponents, this is what you get
but it is concerning that both the VP and the world's richest man (who has incredible influence on this administration) do the same thing. their thoughts and actions actually matter, and now it's clear that instead of reading the actual report, they'd rather just go along with the social media narratives
I guess when the most important thing is "owning" for your political opponents, this is what you get
Anybody can make up a story. I've not seen good evidence for that claim.
And it's a big claim.
(And even then, it's pretty weird... FBI planting people to encourage them to invade the capital so they could... Accomplish what?)
