Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I very well remember one in January 2014 that did.That fake could change the entire game
That fake could change the entire game
Clemson up 28 and throwing bombs
KF is not pleased
To convince the idiots on the playoff committee?Why does Clemson still have their starters out there?
I’m the black sheep in a family full of Ohio State fans. How do you think I feel?I hate Ohio State.
The final play of the Big 10 Championship ends with a vicious example of targeting and there's no call as time has run out.
They are dead already Clemson
Gheesh
#41 from OSU lowered his helmet and went directly into his facemask. Targeting is a personal foul regardless of being a runner or not.He was out of the pocket and a runner. Don't want to get smoked, don't pretend to be a running back.
#41 from OSU lowered his helmet and went directly into his facemask. Targeting is a personal foul regardless of being a runner or not.
No it isn't, running backs get jacked all the time. It's only a targeting foul if he's being held up by someone else and launched into, which was not the case here. The fact that he's a 6'3 220 lb bean pole running straight up with poor technique isn't the defender's fault. Dude was running towards the pylon trying to score and if you don't lower your pad level as a runner you get slammed. The current rule set has really manipulated the viewer into thinking any hard hit is targeting. Dude even planted his right foot and cut back into the defender. You can frame by frame it by pausing and using the < and > keys.
There are two types of targeting: Forcible contract with the crown of the helmet; and Any contact with the head or neck of a defenseless player.
The kid crouched and looked to make forcible contact with the crown of his helmet. That would be targeting.
If there was contact like that, in the video, it should be called.Great, it's not enforced that way. If targeting was really enforced as any forcible contact with the crown of the helmet then there would be at least a dozen targeting penalties a game. No one gives a **** about running backs in these safety rules, so if you're a QB who wants to run, welcome to equality.
Not enforced? In my best Clay Davis voice shhhiiiitttt! Down in the ACC we get these calls almost every game.Great, it's not enforced that way. If targeting was really enforced as any forcible contact with the crown of the helmet then there would be at least a dozen targeting penalties a game. No one gives a **** about running backs in these safety rules, so if you're a QB who wants to run, welcome to equality.
Not enforced? In my best Clay Davis voice shhhiiiitttt! Down in the ACC we get these calls almost every game.