I am still pissed at the replay reversal on Moss's fumble TD return. I see so many reviews that are judged not what they seem.
You know what I mean. There were two review angles on that play. One angle seemed to be from behind the endzone and at first it seemed to show the forearm down with the ball in his hand. I thought it could be overturned if that was all they had to review by. But then the second review angle seemed to really show that ball was loose before the forearm hit the ground.
So now back to the first angle which was in a direct line from camera to the QBs hand to the ball and my thought now was "Maybe the ball just looks to be in his hand?" His hand was open and the ball seemed to be in it but it might have been out of his grip.
You know to me that was the bit of unknown optical evidence that led me to say you CAN'T overturn this call.
I mean why do we have reviews as Pottebaum's fumble now looks like one just like this one that should have and could have been overturned and the Hawks would probably 5-1.
You know what I mean. There were two review angles on that play. One angle seemed to be from behind the endzone and at first it seemed to show the forearm down with the ball in his hand. I thought it could be overturned if that was all they had to review by. But then the second review angle seemed to really show that ball was loose before the forearm hit the ground.
So now back to the first angle which was in a direct line from camera to the QBs hand to the ball and my thought now was "Maybe the ball just looks to be in his hand?" His hand was open and the ball seemed to be in it but it might have been out of his grip.
You know to me that was the bit of unknown optical evidence that led me to say you CAN'T overturn this call.
I mean why do we have reviews as Pottebaum's fumble now looks like one just like this one that should have and could have been overturned and the Hawks would probably 5-1.