ADVERTISEMENT

The Real Goal of the Trump Economy

Colonoscopy

HB Legend
Feb 20, 2022
15,947
18,748
113
52
Saint Louis, Mo

A quarter century ago, Vladimir Putin gathered 21 of Russia’s top oligarchs in the Kremlin to let them know that he, not they, held power in Russia. The young Russian president (not yet for life) informed them that they could keep the wealth they’d amassed if they complied with his political goals. Partnership with Putin held out the prospect of safety, and even greater riches. “We received confirmation,” an attendee named Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky said, “that the development of Russian business is one of the state’s top priorities.”

Most of the oligarchs submitted, but those who didn’t went to prison or into exile, lest they fall prey to the country’s epidemic of window-plunging deaths. (Khodorkovsky was imprisoned, putatively for fraud and tax evasion, but really for supporting independent media and opposition parties.) Since then, affinity for Putin has been a sine qua non of high-level economic success in Russia.

An eerily reminiscent scene played out late last year at Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump’s Winter Palace, where Stephen Miller, one of Trump’s loyalty enforcers, met with Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg. The weather was more pleasant, and presumably neither party contemplated defenestration as a settlement alternative, but many other details seemed to echo. “Mr. Miller told Mr. Zuckerberg that he had an opportunity to help reform America, but it would be on President-elect Donald J. Trump’s terms,” The New York Times reported. Because Trump had recently warned, “We are watching [Zuckerberg] closely, and if he does anything illegal” during Trump’s second term, “he will spend the rest of his life in prison,” this opportunity must have sounded enticing. Zuckerberg indicated that he would not in any way obstruct Trump’s agenda, according to the Times, and foisted blame for any prior offenses onto subordinates.

By the time Trump assumed power, Zuckerberg was lavishing him with praise. “We now have a U.S. administration that is proud of our leading companies,” he gushed of the man who had once threatened him with prison, “that prioritizes American technology winning. And that will defend our values and interests abroad.” His rehabilitation complete, Zuckerberg assumed a place of pride at Trump’s inauguration, alongside Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and other titans of industry. His eyes were now on the future, and the promised Trumpian Golden Age.

read rest:

 

A quarter century ago, Vladimir Putin gathered 21 of Russia’s top oligarchs in the Kremlin to let them know that he, not they, held power in Russia. The young Russian president (not yet for life) informed them that they could keep the wealth they’d amassed if they complied with his political goals. Partnership with Putin held out the prospect of safety, and even greater riches. “We received confirmation,” an attendee named Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky said, “that the development of Russian business is one of the state’s top priorities.”

Most of the oligarchs submitted, but those who didn’t went to prison or into exile, lest they fall prey to the country’s epidemic of window-plunging deaths. (Khodorkovsky was imprisoned, putatively for fraud and tax evasion, but really for supporting independent media and opposition parties.) Since then, affinity for Putin has been a sine qua non of high-level economic success in Russia.

An eerily reminiscent scene played out late last year at Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump’s Winter Palace, where Stephen Miller, one of Trump’s loyalty enforcers, met with Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg. The weather was more pleasant, and presumably neither party contemplated defenestration as a settlement alternative, but many other details seemed to echo. “Mr. Miller told Mr. Zuckerberg that he had an opportunity to help reform America, but it would be on President-elect Donald J. Trump’s terms,” The New York Times reported. Because Trump had recently warned, “We are watching [Zuckerberg] closely, and if he does anything illegal” during Trump’s second term, “he will spend the rest of his life in prison,” this opportunity must have sounded enticing. Zuckerberg indicated that he would not in any way obstruct Trump’s agenda, according to the Times, and foisted blame for any prior offenses onto subordinates.

By the time Trump assumed power, Zuckerberg was lavishing him with praise. “We now have a U.S. administration that is proud of our leading companies,” he gushed of the man who had once threatened him with prison, “that prioritizes American technology winning. And that will defend our values and interests abroad.” His rehabilitation complete, Zuckerberg assumed a place of pride at Trump’s inauguration, alongside Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and other titans of industry. His eyes were now on the future, and the promised Trumpian Golden Age.

read rest:


I'm convinced the New York Times writes many of these articles to trigger the lefties.
 
Last edited:
I'm convinced the New York Times writes many of these articles to get the lefties such as the OP worked up.
There's definitely a market for speculation. I don't think all of it hits the mark. (and it can't since there are a lot of competing opinions)

However, what do you expect? The Trump admin is behaving in ways vastly different than previous admins.

I do think there is value in sampling lots of different opinions and analysis in effort to produce a theory of Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFsdisciple
Obama tried and did stuff of a same but vein (be tranfomative and all powerful as president, control and handcuff alot of the pillars of the economy, Corporations, healthcare,... and doing so in a way that was bordering on not constitutionsal.

Don't be too stubborn, or naive to deny or ignore it
 
This is not complicated. he is a good guy and he wants to make America great. Don't need college level classes on trying to figure it out.
wtf.gif
 
Obama tried and did stuff of a same but vein (be tranfomative and all powerful as president, control and handcuff alot of the pillars of the economy, Corporations, healthcare,... and doing so in a way that was bordering on not constitutionsal.

Don't be too stubborn, or naive to deny or ignore it
Chris-Rock-HUH-WTF.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
Obama tried and did stuff of a same but vein (be tranfomative and all powerful as president, control and handcuff alot of the pillars of the economy, Corporations, healthcare,... and doing so in a way that was bordering on not constitutionsal.

Don't be too stubborn, or naive to deny or ignore it
Obama brought Soros in and put him in charge of a private group staffed by twenty-somethings with zero govt experience and gave them unfettered access to govt computers, allowing them to make unconstitutional cuts to congressionally approved govt spending? Do tell.

If you're going to try to compare any previous president to what's going on now, you're a fvcking idiot. There's no discussing this level of dumbfvckery.
 
There's definitely a market for speculation. I don't think all of it hits the mark. (and it can't since there are a lot of competing opinions)

However, what do you expect? The Trump admin is behaving in ways vastly different than previous admins.

I do think there is value in sampling lots of different opinions and analysis in effort to produce a theory of Trump.
Trump needs to behave in a way that's different than previous administrations, including his own. That said, he's still a bull in a china shop, and unpresidential, and unprofessional. We do need transparency, and we do need to make major spending cuts, and do need to root out the waste and graft and gaming of the system. Unfortunately Trump is doing it the only way he knows how.

There are two ways the BS spending can happen - specific earmarks in bills, or ceding power to an executive agency to give out money via a vague purpose. The latter still requires someone make a decision before a check is cut. We need to start naming names of the people behind the spending so the entire country knows. Who authorized the insane grants for studies? Who authorized condoms for an African country? Get the names out.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT