ADVERTISEMENT

This might be a little tougher than Putin thought...

  • Like
Reactions: HawkMD and h-hawk
"The U.S. giving financial aid to Ukraine is an "incredible" investment for the country, as Washington is spending "peanuts" for what, economist Timothy Ash told Newsweek, would eventually produce wins "at almost every level" if Russia is defeated.

Since the beginning of Russia's invasion of Ukraine on February 24, Congress passed a spending bill worth $13.6 billion in aid to Ukrainians and, in May, the Senate approved nearly $40 billion in additional support—a major package including military, economic and humanitarian assistance.

Ash told Newsweek that the U.S. defense budget exists to counter whatever threats the U.S. faces, and at this very moment, Russia would be among the biggest threats to American security, together with China, North Korea and Iran.

"If you take the total U.S. defense budget and kind of allocate to likely threats, compared to what I estimate with the spend-per-threat [of Russia], which is between $100 billion and $150 billion, spending $40 billion for Ukraine this year is just an incredible spend-per-threat," Ash said.

"Spend-per-threat" is a term that he had coined to indicate the amount of money spent to deter a certain danger coming from another country.

"The ability to erode Russia's conventional force with no threat or no loss to U.S. life is just incredible. The ability to destroy your enemy without putting your own forces at risk with relatively modest investment just strikes me as a gift for the U.S.," Ash said, adding that America's spending on Ukraine is, over the long term, "a no-brainer."

https://www.newsweek.com/how-sending-aid-ukraine-saving-us-billions-dollars-1761058
Reminder Putin was giving aid to the Taliban for the same purpose.
 
FiNOQLqWIAAwGzB
 
In my non-expert opinion, I think that Ukraine will make big strides over the winter. I liken it to how the homeless population in DSM functions in the summer versus the winter. In the summer, people are everywhere, living everywhere, because they can. Once the cold sets in, many migrate elsewhere, or concentrate/congregate indoors. Similarly, poorly equipped Russians will largely be concentrated/congregated for protection from the cold. Meanwhile, many Ukrainian forces are well-equipped, kept relatively warm/protected, and able to operate in harsh conditions to hunt the Russians hunkered down. At least, that is my hope.
The problem is that Ukraine is big, and Russia occupied large tracts of it even before the war started. The Ukrainians simply do not have the manpower to reclaim this turf. Not yet.
 
This is nice, but it's another example of a piece of equipment that the Ukrainians don't already have, and will need a new supply chain to keep up and running, once the pilots are trained. I'd prefer to see more trading of equipment. The Brits should have scoured the planet for some old Soviet equipment already in the Ukrainian arsenal, and then forwarded those along in a swap with the 3rd party country.
But, still, it's nice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lindemann
I love seeing the Cav on the move!

As an artilleryman, that column of tanks is a prize target. Hopefully, the Russians didn't have any forward observers watching them.
I had that thought, but the Russians are so disorganized and lacking precision munitions I imagine that was a fairly safe move for that column.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steelrain
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT