ADVERTISEMENT

This ought to be interesting.

Aardvark86

HB Heisman
Jan 23, 2018
9,906
10,153
113

So the guy - a convicted offender - apparently now claimed to identify as a woman, so the county:school pool people just said “sure go ahead in”. His defense, presumably, will be “how exactly am I supposed to change?” Evil genius, gullible public.

Peak Arlington.

Will be interesting to see if this will become a repeat of youngkin’s 2021 electoral playbook for the va governor. Paging winsome sears. Or perhaps a dep of Ed investigation.
 

So the guy - a convicted offender - apparently now claimed to identify as a woman, so the county:school pool people just said “sure go ahead in”. His defense, presumably, will be “how exactly am I supposed to change?” Evil genius, gullible public.

Peak Arlington.

Will be interesting to see if this will become a repeat of youngkin’s 2021 electoral playbook for the va governor. Paging winsome sears. Or perhaps a dep of Ed investigation.
As a sex offender it's already illegal for the individual to be on school grounds. Pretty simple for the manager to check the registered sexual offenders list. This isn't a trans incident, it's a management failure.
 
As a sex offender it's already illegal for the individual to be on school grounds. Pretty simple for the manager to check the registered sexual offenders list. This isn't a trans incident, it's a management failure.
It’s both - not in the sense that the guys actually trans, but in the sense that the policy creates presumptions of legitimacy based on a simple declaration.

Btw, if I go to a county pool, or say, go to a school basketball game, I’m not really sure I’d expect them to be checking everybody against the registry. So maybe not as big a management fail either
 
It’s both - not in the sense that the guys actually trans, but in the sense that the policy creates presumptions of legitimacy based on a simple declaration.

Btw, if I go to a county pool, or say, go to a school basketball game, I’m not really sure I’d expect them to be checking everybody against the registry. So maybe not as big a management fail either
Lol
 
It’s both - not in the sense that the guys actually trans, but in the sense that the policy creates presumptions of legitimacy based on a simple declaration.

Btw, if I go to a county pool, or say, go to a school basketball game, I’m not really sure I’d expect them to be checking everybody against the registry. So maybe not as big a management fail either
Probably not at a ball game, but at a school located community pool I would think it would be responsible to check the registry.

Please note the following Regulations pertaining the use of the Arlington Aquatics Centers and fees:

  • All persons entering the pool must check in and pay the appropriate fees or present memberships or swim cards.
  • Arlington Residents receive a discounted rate when presenting proof of residency and some form of identification with a photograph.
  • Persons enrolled in Community Classes, private lessons, the Arlington Aquatic Club, or any other team renting the swimming pool will not be charged admission during the class or practice.
  • Fees may be paid by VISA/MasterCard, cash, or check to Arlington Public Schools.
  • Persons purchasing a membership or swim pass must complete and sign a “Hold Harmless” form.
  • Swim Passes are non-refundable and are valid for six months from the day of purchase.
  • Memberships are non-refundable and non-transferable.
  • Persons paying general admission are required to sign in.
The bolded rules would allow for a quick check of the registry.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT