Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is nothing wrong with club teams. Just because club teams exist doesn't mean that rec leagues, programs, and activities can't also exist as a place for kids to participate who don't want to spend a bunch of money. It's the "club team or bust" mentality that is the issue.always hated the demise of the kid league ball leagues and the rise of club teams
So we should throw them to the curb?Thoughts: Many of those living in "poverty" are doing so because they come from broken homes, have parent(s) that didn't care enough about their own future, and aren't invested in their kids future/well-being.
Many of those living outside of "poverty" and are in the >$100K income have education, have drive, are dual income, were raised in non-broken homes so they extend that onto their kids and are invested in their kids future/well-being.
It's no surprise that low income schools/school districts perform worse than those of high income schools. It has nothing to do with money/pupil, teachers, or infrastructure and has everything to do with their upbringing at home.
Thoughts: Many of those living in "poverty" are doing so because they come from broken homes, have parent(s) that didn't care enough about their own future, and aren't invested in their kids future/well-being.
Many of those living outside of "poverty" and are in the >$100K income have education, have drive, are dual income, were raised in non-broken homes so they extend that onto their kids and are invested in their kids future/well-being.
It's no surprise that low income schools/school districts perform worse than those of high income schools. It has nothing to do with money/pupil, teachers, or infrastructure and has everything to do with their upbringing at home.
Never said that. Just saying that I think that is a big contributor to the 23% vs 44% figure. I don't think it's strictly comes down to only 23% of those in "poverty" play because they can't afford it vs 44% because they can.So we should throw them to the curb?
That's not "dumbass useless conservative hindsight" it's factual data. It's science. Keep denying science though.Those aren't thoughts. You're regurgitating decades of dumbass useless conservative hindsight. Maybe orphans shouldn't have been born to parents who were enemies of the mob.
Useless is precisely what your "thoughts" amount to.That's not "dumbass useless conservative hindsight" it's factual data. It's science.
Fine, ignore data science if it makes you feel better.Useless is precisely what your "thoughts" amount to.
You are employing hindsight and shrugging. Congrats on using data to do it.Fine, ignore data science if it makes you feel better.
What "illness"?You're describing the illness. That is useless. You are employing hindsight and shrugging. Congrats on using data to do it.
What "illness"?
Dad's Club will not create better players than Travel Ball will. Like so many things in this country, families with money will have easier access to the good travel ball programs. So because of no fault of their own, kids in poverty will have less access to the better coaching, better competition, and recruiting tools that travel ball provides.
The entire premise of this thread/article is "only 23 percent of kids growing up in poverty played sports versus 44 percent from homes of $100,000 or more" but is eschewing other variables outside of income such as those I mentioned above. There are reasons outside of income that drive the variance. I have not taken a stance on right or wrong, just bringing to light that there are more variables at play than money. I am sorry if you can't understand that.Kids with shitty parents.
"Maybe if their parents weren't awful. Not my problem."
You know what? You're right. I'm gonna sit a few plays out.The entire premise of this thread/article is "only 23 percent of kids growing up in poverty played sports versus 44 percent from homes of $100,000 or more" but is eschewing other variables outside of income such as those I mentioned above. There are reasons outside of income that drive the variance. I have not taken a stance on right or wrong, just bringing to light that there are more variables at play than money. I am sorry if you can't understand that.
Agreed, soccer is the worst. Sorry you had to sit through those. I get having to show support for your kid, but that must have been awful.Soccer actually is the worst in my opinion. Club season is basically 8-9 months of the year even in high school. The minute the season is over it's a few weeks and they club season starts. It's fu$$ing ridiculous.
Most likely not pluralKids with shitty parents.
"Maybe if their parents weren't awful. Not my problem."
I’m sure it’s a little different depending on what part of the country you’re from but in North Dakota nothing can top hockey. Fall 5 on 5 starts early September and rolls into regular club play. There’s no in-house competition so even the worst kids are traveling from mid -November thru the end of March. And then spring 5 on 5 begins immediately and goes until the end of May. And then of course there’s skill sessions all summer.Lot's going on here. Had 3 boys play multiple sports on different club teams. None were good enough to ever make the "elite" teams in any or the sports. Always wanted my kids to play (or try to play) multiple sports. My oldest son was on 2 pretty good soccer and basketball teams in 8th grade and I remember both club teams telling us we needed to start making a choice. It was also getting harder on my son trying to balance both sports. He ended up eventually just not being good enough in basketball in high school and starting 2 years of soccer. Also played tennis but you also faced the dilemma of kids spending thousands a month on tennis as well. Of course those were the kids trying to play in college and literally spending 1500-2000K a month at the racquet club. We were not going there either. Soccer actually is the worst in my opinion. Club season is basically 8-9 months of the year even in high school. The minute the season is over it's a few weeks and they club season starts. It's fu$$ing ridiculous.
I really think people underrate the logistical aspects of this. For those of us with kids in sports, you are CONSTANTLY driving them around. They practice in early evenings. It requires:
a. Transportation, frequently two cars/drivers if you have more than one kid
b. A job you can get out of at 5 or maybe 6pm
c. A job you don't work on Saturdays when the games are
When I was a kid we practiced and played at the neighborhood park. We practiced after school and walked to and from. The fields were incredibly shitty, but we managed. In high school there was a "late bus" that took everyone home about 5pm that stayed after for practices of various sports. Now you have to fight rush hour traffic to pick your kids up from practice.
There is NO WAY that a single mother who is a nurse, or a couple parents balancing retail jobs, could participate in any of leagues that my kids did...and these were strictly town and church leagues, nothing elite.
Remember the old cliche that you'd hear "my parents never came to any of my games?" That's virtually impossible today, because a kid can't participate at all any more if their parents can't/won't commit several hours a week just shuffling them around everywhere.
If they want poor kids back in sports, you have to get them back in neighborhood parks they can walk or ride their bikes to, even if they're not pristine manicured landscape masterpieces. Have practices at 3 or 4 o'clock. Have an 8 game season instead of 20 games.
Stop having a barrier to entry of two parents with cars and nice white collar jobs they can dip out of at 4:30 twice a week or a full time homemaker at the beck and call of driving.
Everything in youth activities is just too...much. A lot of parents, especially working class parents, just can't, or aren't up to it.
There is a lot to this. I was talking with a guy last week that lives in Morningside (Sioux City) and he commented how great it will be when his kids get older because he lives over by Pulaski Park and his kids can just ride their bikes a couple of blocks. I grew up in another area of Morningside over by Washington school and at 10-11-12 would ride my bike to Pulaski Park during the day for practice. I grew up in the era of latch key kids. Our rules growing up were to STAY IN MORNINGSIDE and be home by the time the streetlights come on. Do you understand how insane that sounds now? If you did that today somebody would call child services.I really think people underrate the logistical aspects of this. For those of us with kids in sports, you are CONSTANTLY driving them around. They practice in early evenings. It requires:
a. Transportation, frequently two cars/drivers if you have more than one kid
b. A job you can get out of at 5 or maybe 6pm
c. A job you don't work on Saturdays when the games are
When I was a kid we practiced and played at the neighborhood park. We practiced after school and walked to and from. The fields were incredibly shitty, but we managed. In high school there was a "late bus" that took everyone home about 5pm that stayed after for practices of various sports. Now you have to fight rush hour traffic to pick your kids up from practice.
There is NO WAY that a single mother who is a nurse, or a couple parents balancing retail jobs, could participate in any of leagues that my kids did...and these were strictly town and church leagues, nothing elite.
Remember the old cliche that you'd hear "my parents never came to any of my games?" That's virtually impossible today, because a kid can't participate at all any more if their parents can't/won't commit several hours a week just shuffling them around everywhere.
If they want poor kids back in sports, you have to get them back in neighborhood parks they can walk or ride their bikes to, even if they're not pristine manicured landscape masterpieces. Have practices at 3 or 4 o'clock. Have an 8 game season instead of 20 games.
Stop having a barrier to entry of two parents with cars and nice white collar jobs they can dip out of at 4:30 twice a week or a full time homemaker at the beck and call of driving.
Everything in youth activities is just too...much. A lot of parents, especially working class parents, just can't, or aren't up to it.
Agreed, soccer is the worst. Sorry you had to sit through those. I get having to show support for your kid, but that must have been awful.
I really think people underrate the logistical aspects of this. For those of us with kids in sports, you are CONSTANTLY driving them around. They practice in early evenings. It requires:
a. Transportation, frequently two cars/drivers if you have more than one kid
b. A job you can get out of at 5 or maybe 6pm
c. A job you don't work on Saturdays when the games are
When I was a kid we practiced and played at the neighborhood park. We practiced after school and walked to and from. The fields were incredibly shitty, but we managed. In high school there was a "late bus" that took everyone home about 5pm that stayed after for practices of various sports. Now you have to fight rush hour traffic to pick your kids up from practice.
There is NO WAY that a single mother who is a nurse, or a couple parents balancing retail jobs, could participate in any of leagues that my kids did...and these were strictly town and church leagues, nothing elite.
Remember the old cliche that you'd hear "my parents never came to any of my games?" That's virtually impossible today, because a kid can't participate at all any more if their parents can't/won't commit several hours a week just shuffling them around everywhere.
If they want poor kids back in sports, you have to get them back in neighborhood parks they can walk or ride their bikes to, even if they're not pristine manicured landscape masterpieces. Have practices at 3 or 4 o'clock. Have an 8 game season instead of 20 games.
Stop having a barrier to entry of two parents with cars and nice white collar jobs they can dip out of at 4:30 twice a week or a full time homemaker at the beck and call of driving.
Everything in youth activities is just too...much. A lot of parents, especially working class parents, just can't, or aren't up to it.
Exactly. We saw this was coming and as a result my wife walked away from a wonderful 6 figure position to get into teaching. Granted she wanted to "give back" and teaching was always her first love but the bigger draw was the ability to be available to "drive the bus" to give our kids the opportunities we wanted them to have.Stop having a barrier to entry of two parents with cars and nice white collar jobs they can dip out of at 4:30 twice a week or a full time homemaker at the beck and call of driving.
Maybe they enjoy it?Again agree about the never ending pursuit of college scholarships, which a lot of that falls on the parents as well as the club teams. As you said most of the kids that do get scholarships in any sports, besides the most truly gifted, are D2 at best and most are D3 or NAIA. As you stated, besides basketball and FB, the other sports divide their scholarships. If you get good grades along w/being good in that sport you can probably go to a school like Simpson or Central for half the amount and continue to play a sport you like. We made a visit to one of those schools and it was just to small for my son. He hated the visit and I think he realized he wanted to go to a big state school and join a fraternity and have fun. Which totally turned out to be the right choice. When you figure the 125-150 dollars a month I paid out for 3 kids I realize what a sucker I was. I didn't really do it for a scholarship but once you are in the cult around 13-14 years old you feel the need to do it just to keep them competitive enough to be on the high school team.
I think you are missing the point here. As a family we have had almost all great memories. Over the years you maybe had an a-hole coach or 2 but met a ton of great people and my kids met so many other great kids. Growing up in Suburbia, my kids were not exposed to a lot. Both kids that played basketball got some diversity in the kids they met and I think that was a great learning experience for them. But back to the point, as you said it's great if you have the money. Well sure, everything is great if you have the money, which is kind of where the OP was going. If you are from a single family home or don't have a lot of money to pay the monthly fees you're probably not playing. Go to a baseball tournament or a soccer tournament. 98% of the kids are rich, white suburban kids. They have the money to travel and pay for 2-3 tournaments a month that these teams are doing.Everyone acting like kids being on travel teams is terrible.
But, we had a great time with it. Didn't really have any expectations other than giving my kid the opportunity to be the best he could be at the sport he loved.
Met a bunch of great kids and families across a bunch of different schools. Had a lot of fun trips to tournaments that would have otherwise been just another weekend I'd have forgotten about.
If you have the money, the right attitude, and it makes sense for your family, it can be great.
Broken homes are caused by the mob. Got it.Those aren't thoughts. You're regurgitating decades of dumbass useless conservative hindsight. Maybe orphans shouldn't have been born to parents who were enemies of the mob.