ADVERTISEMENT

To understand why Trump won, look at Democratic hysteria

The Tradition

HR King
Apr 23, 2002
123,456
97,027
113
If you want to understand why Donald Trump is president (and why he could win a second term), look to the Democrats’ hysterical response to two of Trump’s major foreign policy achievements over the past week.

Last Thursday, the president traveled to Joint Base Andrews to greet three American hostages whose release he had secured from North Korea. Unlike his predecessor, Trump did it without sending the offending regime an unmarked plane loaded with hundreds of millions in hard currency. The return of these American captives should have been a moment of celebration and bipartisan unity.

So how did Democrats respond? By blasting Trump for the way he welcomed the U.S. hostages home.


The pretext for their outrage was Trump’s comment thanking Kim Jong Un, who he said “really was excellent to these three incredible people” — by which Trump obviously meant releasing them. No matter. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., took the Senate floor to attack Trump for his “troubling” remarks. “Kim Jong Un is a dictator” who “capriciously detained American citizens,” Schumer declared, channeling Captain Obvious, and warned that, by praising Kim, Trump “weakens American foreign policy and puts American citizens at risk around the world.”

Seriously? How do Democrats take a positive event such as the release of American hostages and turn it into an excuse to attack Trump?

Apparently, Trump Derangement Syndrome is so debilitating that Democrats can’t bring themselves to say “Good job, Mr. President,” even when he brings our hostages home.

Before, Democrats complained that Trump was too belligerent toward Kim; now, they’re upset that he is too effusive.

This is absurd. Trump is laying the groundwork for a high-stakes nuclear summit with Kim; of course the president is not going to publicly criticize him.

People in Middle America listen to the Democrats’ reactions and think: Can Trump do nothing right in these people’s eyes?

Then, a few days later, Trump racked up another major achievement when he fulfilled his promise to move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. Four American presidents pledged to do it, but only Trump actually did.

How did Democrats respond? Not a single congressional Democrat traveled to Israel to attend the historic opening of the embassy.

Sen. Lindsey O. Graham, R-S.C., said that he personally invited Democrats to join the congressional delegation, but no one took him up on the offer.


“I am disappointed that not one Democrat came,” Graham said. “What does that say?” It says not a single Democrat could bring themselves to join in a celebration of what Trump had done.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, blasted Trump’s decision when he announced it in December, declaring that “moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem now may needlessly spark mass protests, fuel tensions, and make it more difficult to reach a durable peace.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, another D-Calif., did the same, declaring, “The future of Jerusalem is an issue that should be decided by Israel and the Palestinians, not unilaterally by the United States.” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., called Trump’s embassy move a setback while former Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., declared that Trump’s action would “severely, perhaps irreparably damage” peace efforts.

Keep in mind, the past four Democratic Party platforms had called for the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. And last June, the Senate voted 90-0 (with the support of Feinstein, Murphy, and Sanders) for a resolution that “reaffirms the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995,” which mandated the embassy move (a bill that passed two decades ago with Pelosi’s vote).

Americans see Trump being criticized for doing exactly what Congress demanded, and his Democratic and Republican predecessors promised, and they rightly see hypocrisy.

No matter what Trump does, the Democratic reaction is the same: Outrage. When Democrats can’t even praise Trump unreservedly for bringing American hostages home or show up when he fulfills a plank of the Democratic Party platform by moving our embassy to Jerusalem, it further convinces millions of Americans who abandoned the Democratic Party in 2016 that they made the right decision.

http://www.richmond.com/opinion/the...cle_3ff8709a-c47f-596b-a785-a94eb7d7fb58.html
 
There is growing evidence that the hateful tactics
of the Democrat party against President Trump will
cost them in the mid-term elections in November.
The American people are seeing that the Democrat
party is still sulking and whining about the election
of 2016. Hatred for Trump is not a winning campaign
issue.
 
Special elections called. They said pointing out all of Trump's bullshit is causing Dems to slaughter the GOP.
 
58 people died in protests over the moving of the embassy. Im glad the Dems weren’t there to high five Trump.
As far as North Korea, do they still have nukes?
I always laugh at the comment about money. We gave Iran back their own money. We didn’t pay them anything. In return we got stability, and verified compliance. Now we have furious allies, the prospect of US airmen and soldiers dying in Iran, and the prospect of Iran moving closer to Russia and China, with no US net gain. I will also bypass the high fives for now.
 
Last edited:
Obviously neither are major foreign policy achievements. Now if NoKo truly lays down its arms, that will be something to applaud.


On a related note, I have no sympathy whatever for people who get arrested in Axis of Evil countries. Just don't go there and jeopardize our foreign policy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
Lol. Cons never once said good job mr. President to Obama.
There is growing evidence that the hateful tactics
of the Democrat party against President Trump will
cost them in the mid-term elections in November.
The American people are seeing that the Democrat
party is still sulking and whining about the election
of 2016. Hatred for Trump is not a winning campaign
issue.
There are many liberals out there who basically are telling other liberals to shut the hell up. The smart ones know that being the typical a$$hole democrat is not helping their cause.

Why don't liberals just be honest and give us their liberal plan for 2018? Ah, that's right, they can't tell us the truth.
 
Like every other explanation, policy isn't mentioned, just emotion.

Voting because you like his style, out of spite of democrats or that you like he makes the liberals angry is where we're at.

Deplorable.
Aren't how many Democratic leaders act toward Trump just as easily based on their hate of the man. You know an emotional response.
 
Aren't how many Democratic leaders act toward Trump just as easily based on their hate of the man. You know an emotional response.
Saying something when someone like Trump berated women and veterans is what we should be doing.

Do you agree with that? Or should we ignore bullying?
 
When it comes to being unlikable, untrustworthy, lying, and deceiving, men can never compete on that social stage. Women are experts in being backstabbing bitches. There are very few women that can be trusted, and certainly no liberal woman can be trusted. Most people want alpha males in charge, except for liberal pussies.

There are many liberals out there who basically are telling other liberals to shut the hell up. The smart ones know that being the typical a$$hole democrat is not helping their cause.

Why don't liberals just be honest and give us their liberal plan for 2018? Ah, that's right, they can't tell us the truth.

Classy cemar
 
Aren't how many Democratic leaders act toward Trump just as easily based on their hate of the man. You know an emotional response.

I think their hate is based on the content of his words and the actions that he makes.

1. Democrats rip Trump for lying.
2. Republicans embrace Trump because he angers Democrats and they don't like the way they're treating him.

I don't think those reactions are the same.
 
I told several friends in November of 2016 that the
Democrats and GOP must really dislike our nation
to give us such bad choices as Hillary and Trump.
There is apathy in both political parties as far as
providing dynamic leadership in the White House.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
Huh, I always thought it was because the people that voted for him were easily suckered by a two bit con man.

It's too bad the Democrats couldn't pick a better candidate like an FDR, John F. Kennedy or Barack Obama.

He would have easily destroyed Trump.
 
I think their hate is based on the content of his words and the actions that he makes.

1. Democrats rip Trump for lying.
2. Republicans embrace Trump because he angers Democrats and they don't like the way they're treating him.

I don't think those reactions are the same.
Hatred is based partly on what he does and says, but primarily I think it's based on the fact that he's such a douchebag, has been forever, and they are really pissed that he's president.

1. Makes sense
2. I don't see a lot of Republicans embracing Trump. I DO see a lot of Republicans enjoying the discomfiture he causes among Democrats, and criticizing the way he's been treated. Maybe I just am fazed by the word "embrace."
 
Keep in mind that Trump's big foreign policy week also included close to $1 billion dollars getting funneled into Trump/Kushner projects from foreign sources. That should concern people a lot more than it is.
 
So...if the GOP were to nominate an avowed White Supremacist, and the deplorables came out in large enough numbers to win the Presidency, it would be the fault of liberals for making a predictable fuss about the nomination of an avowed White Supremacist. Basically, however horrible the President might be, it's the fault of liberals. Because so long as the President angers them they should expect their anger to accomplish nothing more than to spur conservatives to turn out in larger and larger numbers and nominate more and more despicable candidates.

Makes sense.
 
Like every other explanation, policy isn't mentioned, just emotion.

Voting because you like his style, out of spite of democrats or that you like he makes the liberals angry is where we're at.

Deplorable.

You just described our entire nations political psyche over the past 12 years...each year building more and more on this stupid foundation.
 
Lol. Cons never once said good job mr. President to Obama.
I am sorry. Let me do it now. Thanks Obama for f-ing up Healthcare and lying about premiums going down and you can keep your Dr. Also for making this country so divided that we got a President Trump. And for helping get the worst candidate to run to replace you you could have found. Well done!
 
I am sorry. Let me do it now. Thanks Obama for f-ing up Healthcare and lying about premiums going down and you can keep your Dr. Also for making this country so divided that we got a President Trump. And for helping get the worst candidate to run to replace you you could have found. Well done!
It's Obama's fault that republicans picked Trump over 13 other candidates?

I remember when republicans used to be accountable for their actions.
 
I remember when any exploration into the layers of factors that brought us Trump was presented, cons would be like, look at dems they just can’t get over the election. Now it seems cons are the ones sharing thoughts as to why we have Trump. Almost like a buyer’s remorse thing mixed with scapegoating. Because, you know, accountability is so 2010 or whatever.

This thread already has plenty of the inescapable projection and false equivalency, too.
 
So...if the GOP were to nominate an avowed White Supremacist, and the deplorables came out in large enough numbers to win the Presidency, it would be the fault of liberals for making a predictable fuss about the nomination of an avowed White Supremacist. Basically, however horrible the President might be, it's the fault of liberals. Because so long as the President angers them they should expect their anger to accomplish nothing more than to spur conservatives to turn out in larger and larger numbers and nominate more and more despicable candidates.

Makes sense.
It wouldn’t be the liberals’ fault for not criticizing. It would be their fault for not offering a better choice.
 
If you want to understand why Donald Trump is president (and why he could win a second term), look to the Democrats’ hysterical response to two of Trump’s major foreign policy achievements over the past week.

Last Thursday, the president traveled to Joint Base Andrews to greet three American hostages whose release he had secured from North Korea. Unlike his predecessor, Trump did it without sending the offending regime an unmarked plane loaded with hundreds of millions in hard currency. The return of these American captives should have been a moment of celebration and bipartisan unity.

So how did Democrats respond? By blasting Trump for the way he welcomed the U.S. hostages home.


The pretext for their outrage was Trump’s comment thanking Kim Jong Un, who he said “really was excellent to these three incredible people” — by which Trump obviously meant releasing them. No matter. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., took the Senate floor to attack Trump for his “troubling” remarks. “Kim Jong Un is a dictator” who “capriciously detained American citizens,” Schumer declared, channeling Captain Obvious, and warned that, by praising Kim, Trump “weakens American foreign policy and puts American citizens at risk around the world.”

Seriously? How do Democrats take a positive event such as the release of American hostages and turn it into an excuse to attack Trump?

Apparently, Trump Derangement Syndrome is so debilitating that Democrats can’t bring themselves to say “Good job, Mr. President,” even when he brings our hostages home.

Before, Democrats complained that Trump was too belligerent toward Kim; now, they’re upset that he is too effusive.

This is absurd. Trump is laying the groundwork for a high-stakes nuclear summit with Kim; of course the president is not going to publicly criticize him.

People in Middle America listen to the Democrats’ reactions and think: Can Trump do nothing right in these people’s eyes?

Then, a few days later, Trump racked up another major achievement when he fulfilled his promise to move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. Four American presidents pledged to do it, but only Trump actually did.

How did Democrats respond? Not a single congressional Democrat traveled to Israel to attend the historic opening of the embassy.

Sen. Lindsey O. Graham, R-S.C., said that he personally invited Democrats to join the congressional delegation, but no one took him up on the offer.


“I am disappointed that not one Democrat came,” Graham said. “What does that say?” It says not a single Democrat could bring themselves to join in a celebration of what Trump had done.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, blasted Trump’s decision when he announced it in December, declaring that “moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem now may needlessly spark mass protests, fuel tensions, and make it more difficult to reach a durable peace.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, another D-Calif., did the same, declaring, “The future of Jerusalem is an issue that should be decided by Israel and the Palestinians, not unilaterally by the United States.” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., called Trump’s embassy move a setback while former Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., declared that Trump’s action would “severely, perhaps irreparably damage” peace efforts.

Keep in mind, the past four Democratic Party platforms had called for the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. And last June, the Senate voted 90-0 (with the support of Feinstein, Murphy, and Sanders) for a resolution that “reaffirms the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995,” which mandated the embassy move (a bill that passed two decades ago with Pelosi’s vote).

Americans see Trump being criticized for doing exactly what Congress demanded, and his Democratic and Republican predecessors promised, and they rightly see hypocrisy.

No matter what Trump does, the Democratic reaction is the same: Outrage. When Democrats can’t even praise Trump unreservedly for bringing American hostages home or show up when he fulfills a plank of the Democratic Party platform by moving our embassy to Jerusalem, it further convinces millions of Americans who abandoned the Democratic Party in 2016 that they made the right decision.

http://www.richmond.com/opinion/the...cle_3ff8709a-c47f-596b-a785-a94eb7d7fb58.html

I remember the day when Republicans accused Obama of spiking the football when he went on national television to gloat over the death of Bin Laden. They are curiously silent when Trump preens at the top of the steps of the plane when North Korean prisoners are released. I don’t believe Obama ever did that.
 
So...if the GOP were to nominate an avowed White Supremacist, and the deplorables came out in large enough numbers to win the Presidency, it would be the fault of liberals for making a predictable fuss about the nomination of an avowed White Supremacist. Basically, however horrible the President might be, it's the fault of liberals. Because so long as the President angers them they should expect their anger to accomplish nothing more than to spur conservatives to turn out in larger and larger numbers and nominate more and more despicable candidates.

Makes sense.

What the hell are you even talking about?
 
There is growing evidence that the hateful tactics
of the Democrat party against President Trump will
cost them in the mid-term elections in November.
The American people are seeing that the Democrat
party is still sulking and whining about the election
of 2016. Hatred for Trump is not a winning campaign
issue.

This sounds like a prayer and not anything that is born out of any factual basis. Unless the Russians hack our election again. I mean, Trump has done nothing to prevent it and I wouldn't be surprised if he provided information that would all the Russians to directly take over vote counts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artradley
It's Obama's fault that republicans picked Trump over 13 other candidates?

I remember when republicans used to be accountable for their actions.

I don’t think you have a very good grasp of what happened, which is ok because most people have trouble comprehending the incomprehensible. The GOP leadership was very anti-Trump along with much of the small core base. The Democrats had a problem of their own and colluded in order for Hillary to defeat a known socialist to to win the Dem nomination. Biden likely would have won the election in a landslide. The GOP establishment, to their credit acquiesced to the will of the voters and nominated Trump but they also probably knew that he stood a decent chance of winning a matchup with Hillary compared to the other candidates. The others wouldn’t have brought out the voters that he did.

The very fact that Bernie presented such a challenge to Hillary in the primaries was a very clear indicator that she’d struggle against a populist candidate like Trump. He parlayed name recognition and familiarity with a wide, diverse and broad range of voters to win the GOP nomination. Many of these voters were independents but aligned with the GOP in order to vote for Trump. Name recognition carries a large amount of political capital, and the timing was right too. The GOP’s major flaw was trotting our several uninspiring, uncharismatic candidates (including another Bush) during a time when people wanted a big change.

There were a lot of parallels between this election and the 1998 Minnesota gubernatorial election. You had a very unlikable favorite (Norm Coleman) facing a milquetoast DFL opponent in Skip Humphrey. 2016 was the mainstream voter’s way of expressing their dissatisfaction with the political demogogreury and progress in this country. He may get re-elected again in 2020 for the very same reasons.
 
It wouldn’t be the liberals’ fault for not criticizing. It would be their fault for not offering a better choice.

So, it's liberal's fault for Trump. Are you f*****g serious? You bought this shit show, you filled in the dot next to Trump, the least you could do is own up to it. Christ, you won't take responsibility for anything.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT