What do you guys think the Federal Judge will rule with regard to the 4-game suspension for Tom Brady's alleged role in the Deflategate saga?
I have read some opinions on both sides but if I had to guess, I believe the suspension will be overturned due to lack of firm evidence, but moreso because of the horrible way in which the NFL handled the investigation. Claiming that Ted Wells was an "Independent Investigator" was silly, and then using the fact that Brady didn't turn over his cell phone as reason to suspend was out of line.
If the standard for this ordeal were the same as is used in criminal law, this case would have been dismissed for lack of evidence and a botched investigation.
I am not a Pats fan and they likely play on the edges/gray areas with regard to the rules, but I believe the suspension should be overturned and that Brady should be out there playing in Week One.
What say you, HROT?
I have read some opinions on both sides but if I had to guess, I believe the suspension will be overturned due to lack of firm evidence, but moreso because of the horrible way in which the NFL handled the investigation. Claiming that Ted Wells was an "Independent Investigator" was silly, and then using the fact that Brady didn't turn over his cell phone as reason to suspend was out of line.
If the standard for this ordeal were the same as is used in criminal law, this case would have been dismissed for lack of evidence and a botched investigation.
I am not a Pats fan and they likely play on the edges/gray areas with regard to the rules, but I believe the suspension should be overturned and that Brady should be out there playing in Week One.
What say you, HROT?