ADVERTISEMENT

TPP. What could POSSIBLY go wrong?

IMCC965

HB Legend
May 12, 2009
21,614
3,918
113
62
North Liberty
Sessions-desk1-640x480.jpg


http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...d-jeff-sessions-desk-looms-several-feet-high/
 
Wait. Are you sure you're against this? Republicans are overwhelmingly for it. I'd love to get you on record, seeing as you obviously have not read any of that stack of papers...
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
You guys are funny.

So will you go on record or no?

You've clearly not read a page, yet feel comfortable repeating what Breibart said and taking it to the bank.

Are you going against the Republicans and saying this is a bad deal, or are you on board with it?

(or, like I suspect, are you just using this thread to bitch and moan, per usual, about anything Obama does?)
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
So will you go on record or no?

You've clearly not read a page, yet feel comfortable repeating what Breibart said and taking it to the bank.

Are you going against the Republicans and saying this is a bad deal, or are you on board with it?

(or, like I suspect, are you just using this thread to bitch and moan, per usual, about anything Obama does?)

What is your opinion on it?

I wonder if there is an intellectual property in it to limit the firing of a gun every 10 seconds or so? (Only slieb knows)
 
What is your opinion on it?

I wonder if there is an intellectual property in it to limit the firing of a gun every 10 seconds or so? (Only slieb knows)

I'm not in a position to opine on it, due to the fact that I haven't read a page of it. I like the general idea of it, but I haven't read shit on it.

Hence why I didn't start the thread...

Yet here we are, 10 hours later, and no response from Mr. IMCC. He's so ready to kill Obama over the deal, but he can't articulate a single intelligent thought on it. BAU.

Also blow me. You want to rehash that argument? I don't mind. If you really think we have technology to person to person video call each other from continents away on a device that is 4", while also browsing the internet, tracking the steps we've taken, and hailing us a cab, yet we couldn't come up with some sort of contraption to delay the shooting of a gun, you're dumber than I thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
If you really think we have technology to person to person video call each other from continents away on a device that is 4", while also browsing the internet, tracking the steps we've taken, and hailing us a cab, yet we couldn't come up with some sort of contraption to delay the shooting of a gun, you're dumber than I thought.

What happens when someone hacks your gun?
 
Wait. Are you sure you're against this? Republicans are overwhelmingly for it. I'd love to get you on record, seeing as you obviously have not read any of that stack of papers...

Silly, don't you know that it's a knee jerk reaction from IMCC that anything that Obama's for, he has to be automatically against! If he took the time tor realize that many Democrats oppose the TPP it would surely leave him torn!
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
What happens when someone hacks your gun?

Hey, the idea isn't perfect. It was a spitballing idea I had in a conversation on potential compromises between gun owners and anti-gun groups, and he's held onto it for at least 6 weeks now.

As of now, someone doesn't even have to hack your gun. They can just be 3 years old and shoot the neighbor kid when you irresponsibly leave it out.
 
Silly, don't you know that it's a knee jerk reaction from IMCC that anything that Obama's for, he has to be automatically against! If he took the time tor realize that many Democrats oppose the TPP it would surely leave him torn!

Weird -- IMCC is still a no show here after being called out.
 
So will you go on record or no?

You've clearly not read a page, yet feel comfortable repeating what Breibart said and taking it to the bank.

Are you going against the Republicans and saying this is a bad deal, or are you on board with it?

(or, like I suspect, are you just using this thread to bitch and moan, per usual, about anything Obama does?)


Haven't read the 5,600 pages. Doubt I will. What I do know is any legislation (i.e. Obamacare) that is THOUSANDS of pages long, is bad because no one knows what's in it. And it's designed to be that way.

You can't possibly believe that hundreds of 20-something staffers working 22 hours a day in the back rooms of D.C. know what they're doing and can make it all work together?
 
Haven't read the 5,600 pages. Doubt I will. What I do know is any legislation (i.e. Obamacare) that is THOUSANDS of pages long, is bad because no one knows what's in it. And it's designed to be that way.

You can't possibly believe that hundreds of 20-something staffers working 22 hours a day in the back rooms of D.C. know what they're doing and can make it all work together?
Damn, those are some hard working government workers. They clearly need a union.
 
Haven't read the 5,600 pages. Doubt I will. What I do know is any legislation (i.e. Obamacare) that is THOUSANDS of pages long, is bad because no one knows what's in it. And it's designed to be that way.

You can't possibly believe that hundreds of 20-something staffers working 22 hours a day in the back rooms of D.C. know what they're doing and can make it all work together?

Lol. So you're against it because it's "long". Solid logic Chief.

I love that you can't even give me a summary of the bill. Just that Briebart is against it.

Got it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT