I rather enjoy smacking Kyle around with facts but that's just me .
So you roam the message boards of other teams looking for confrontation? So you're #2 on this list? The Persistent Debate Troll.
I see one post where you refer to a poster as a "smug Iowa fan". I see you posted the exact same post in a thread numerous times. You are a troll.
Sounds about right. Only this is a public forum and I generally only respond to questions and threads started about neb or other B1G schools. I find typical Iowa fan to be undeservedly smug and pretentious and enjoy calling them out. The threads and posts have improved ten fold since I started policing this board.
Ok, never claimed anything different. Look up the definition of smug if needed, it's an adjective and accurately describes those I call out. Those on here who are not "smug Iowa fan" don't respond as they know I'm not talking about them.
No need, I know what I typed. If you don't know the difference between using an adjective (smug) and calling names, a few I've read include, black skirts, Debbie, snowflake, spade, and on and on, then I can't help you.
IH17 this is absolutely hilarious, but you may have forgotten how on another thread you tried to convince everyone that you had ignored me and could only "assume" I was continuing a thread, when all along you were reading every post I typed. You should check yourself before calling out others.
So in other words you are an undeservedly smug, massive troll.
No. Only post the facts. I would be happy to repeat the facts if needed, just let me know.
No you dont. You spew BS.
Here we go again dean, 3-1 versus Fry, 5-3 versus KF and 29-15 overall. I know your type of hawk fan, you are the close losses matter fan. Keep your close losses and 12-2 give me a ring season. Iowa will always be less relevant until Iowa either wins a B1G title or a NC. I hold the hawks to the same standard you hold the rest of the B1G. It bothers you that neb took iowas spot as the 5 or 6th best team in the B1G.
No, you're here because it bothers you that Nebraska currently is not any better than Iowa and doesn't seem to be going in the right direction for Nebraska so you try to tear down fans of other teams to make yourself feel better. You rely on history because that's all Nebraska can hang over Iowa right now. Until you can admit that then you're nothing but a bitter troll.
That's a better post then most on here, albeit not true. Let's keep this thread going as well.
I get it dean and have acknowledged that I understand you and your type of hawk fan, you are "top 10 finishes and close loses matter" fan. Iowas best run is statistically the same as nebs worst, I've acknowledged all of those statistical facts. I also did it in three sentences, you need to figure out how to get your point across more concisely. I suggest just typingYou're correct on what would make us more relevant. It would be nice but, unlike a Husker fan, most of us can be content with not having that and knowing what it usually takes to get that...andlikely won't happen at Iowa. I believe we can one day Iowa does it without the asterisk! What I don't understand is your team hasn't been very good for many years but here you are, trolling. Reaching back as many years as you can to prove something nearly no one cares about, to prove some point you have? I'm more proud of the fact my team came from 23yrs of losing seasons to become competitive with the best most years and to actually have 5 top ten rankings this century compared to your Huskers zero? Recruits have to be spoon fed how relevant Nebraska should be due to NO evidence of it in their life time, lol. I think I might be feeling a little smug now
I recognize you. Polish up those top ten rings. Iowa fan is literally the only fan base that would bring that up. Keep this thread trolling, I mean rolling.
From the fanbase who has to bring up results from earlier than 2001. Get over it. Reality is Nebraska and Iowa are similar now with Iowa beating Nebraska. That's not a "run", it's reality.
This has been covered, but hawk fan brought up the past and I responded. I know the rules of this board, no pre 2002 banter. Yes, they are similar in record since 2002 and that has been acknowledged as well. I guess we agree on a lot. There is much more respect for Iowa from neb fan then vice versa. I will say the quality of this board has not improved since I started policing it. Here's an idea, police it yourselves.
My vocabulary is fine. Your choice in hobbies is what we should be evaluating here.
So is "typical". You claimed to only call Iowa fans three different things. I corrected you. That was with only looking at your last few posts.
